1 / 23

TUTORIAL-07: GLUE Analysis

TUTORIAL-07: GLUE Analysis. Laura Dobor, Péter Ittzés, Dóra Ittzés, Ferenc Horváth & Zoltán Barcza Training WS for Ecosystem Modelling studies Budapest, 29-30 of May, 2014. Box wrote that „ E ssentially, all models are wrong, but some are useful".

butlerelaine
Download Presentation

TUTORIAL-07: GLUE Analysis

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. TUTORIAL-07:GLUE Analysis Laura Dobor, Péter Ittzés, Dóra Ittzés, Ferenc Horváth & Zoltán Barcza Training WS for Ecosystem Modelling studiesBudapest, 29-30 of May, 2014

  2. Box wrote that „Essentially, all models are wrong, but some are useful"

  3. MODULE X:Understanding basics of GLUE Analysis1) Purpose and main features of GLUE = Generalized Likelihood Uncertainty EstimationAIM: to estimate parameter valuesNEEDS: based on observation data & Monte Carlo ExperimentMETHOD: compare the obs to different model results (based on different parameter sets) Find out which parameter set gives the best results to our observations?How to measure the goodness of the outputs? misfit calculation (root mean square error)  likelihood calculationGreater LH value refers to better parameter set

  4. 2) Randomized parameters, output settings (MCE) + + Observational dataset >>> GLUE optionsGLUE needs careful preparation!A) Monte Carlo Experiment:-- randomize the parameters which you want to calibrate -- ask for the outputs wherefor you have observationb) Observation data:-- match your observation to one of the MuSo outputs (look up for the variable short name and code at the output variables)-- prepare your file in csv format and upload it to the database Run GLUE workflow at the portal!

  5. MODULE X:Guess a riddle!-- We defined 3 different epc files with differences in a few parameters  giveinvented names to them (HARMONY, LEAFAREA, NITROGEN)-- We run carbon simulations and get the outputs-- We defined these unreal-data as observation datasets in the project database  give invented names to them (HUMUS, AIR, NINE)The question is: Which observation comes from which ecophysiological parametrization?KEY: Use the GLUE analysis!Group work:Creat 3 groups, each select one obs dataset

  6. HARMONY NITROGEN LEAFAREA Differencies in the defined epc-s Canopy average specific leaf area 49 49 32 Leaf N in Rubisco 0.21 0.12 0.21

  7. Already exist Monte Carlo Experiments based on the 3 different epc…

  8. The question is: Which observation comes from which ecophysiological parametrization?Exercise:1) Choose one TEST DEMO Daily Observation dataset (i.e. NINE)2) Run a GLUE workflow at the portal compare your obs data to the different MCEresults (i.e. NINE X LEAFAREA; NINE X HARMONY …)3) Download (from database) and check the results in Excel!4) Draw GLUE plots and try to answer the question!

  9. How to run GLUE?GO TO PORTAL: http://workshop.at.biovel.euLOG IN! GO TO ECOSYSTEM MODELING!

  10. SELECT GLUE WORKFLOW TO RUN…

  11. GIVE A NAME…START RUN……WAIT FOR THE INTERACTION PAGE…

  12. SET YOUR RUN ON THE INTERACTION PAGE… GIVE A NAME TO THE RUN… Biome-BGC MuSo 2.2 TEST DEMO HHS (HU) [855]

  13. HARMONY, NITROGEN OR LEAFAREA SET YOUR RUN… AIR, NINE OR HUMUS TEST DEMO HHS MCE FIVEPARAMS 10.000 ….HARMONY [1145] TEST DEMO Daily observation data 2001-2002 – AIR [1164]

  14. CHECK THE STATUS OF YOUR RUN AT PROJECT DATABASE…GET THE RESULTS

  15. GLUE RESULTS:2 FILESLOOK THE randinputs_likelihoods.csvEvery line refers to one parameter set. Last column is the likelihood value. plot likelihood vs parameters one-by-one

  16. EPC files HARMONY NITROGEN LEAFAREA Match the pairs! Observations AIR HUMUS NINE  ? HARMONY NITROGEN LEAFAREA Differencies in the defined epc-s Canopy average specific leaf area 49 49 32 Leaf N in Rubisco 0.21 0.12 0.21

  17. Answers…

  18. HUMUS observation compared to MCE Leaf N in Rubisco Canopy average specific leaf area Likelihood Likelihood HARMONY Find max Likelihood… Canopy average specific leaf area 49 49 32 Leaf N in Rubisco 0.21 0.12 0.21

  19. AIR observation compared to MCE Leaf N in Rubisco Canopy average specific leaf area Likelihood Likelihood LEAFAREA Find max Likelihood… Canopy average specific leaf area 49 49 32 Leaf N in Rubisco 0.21 0.12 0.21

  20. NINE observation compared to MCE Leaf N in Rubisco Canopy average specific leaf area Likelihood Likelihood NITROGEN Find max Likelihood… Canopy average specific leaf area 49 49 32 Leaf N in Rubisco 0.21 0.12 0.21

  21. EPC files HARMONY NITROGEN LEAFAREA Match the pairs! Observations AIR HUMUS NINE HARMONY NITROGEN LEAFAREA Differencies in the defined epc-s Canopy average specific leaf area 49 49 32 Leaf N in Rubisco 0.21 0.12 0.21

  22. Thank you for your attention!

More Related