1 / 34

Executive Session Director’s CD-1 Review of the APUL Project

Executive Session Director’s CD-1 Review of the APUL Project. July 16-17, 2009 Dean A. Hoffer. Agenda for Exec Session. Charge to Reviewers Review Agenda DOE O 413.3 Critical Decision Table Document Requirements Technical Design Review Guidance Cost/Schedule Review Guidance

byron
Download Presentation

Executive Session Director’s CD-1 Review of the APUL Project

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Executive Session Director’s CD-1 Review of theAPUL Project July 16-17, 2009 Dean A. Hoffer

  2. Agenda for Exec Session • Charge to Reviewers • Review Agenda • DOE O 413.3 Critical Decision Table • Document Requirements • Technical Design Review Guidance • Cost/Schedule Review Guidance • Reporting Structure • Reviewer Assignments • Cost / Contingency Table • Discussion Director's CD-1 Review of the APUL Project

  3. Charge Director's CD-1 Review of the APUL Project

  4. Charge (continued) Director's CD-1 Review of the APUL Project

  5. Charge Attachment #1 Director's CD-1 Review of the APUL Project

  6. Charge Attachment #1 (continued) Director's CD-1 Review of the APUL Project

  7. Agenda Director's CD-1 Review of the APUL Project

  8. Agenda (continued) Director's CD-1 Review of the APUL Project

  9. Agenda (continued) Director's CD-1 Review of the APUL Project

  10. DOE O 413.3Critical Decision Table Director's CD-1 Review of the APUL Project

  11. CD-1 Documentation • Acquisition Strategy • Preliminary Project Execution Plan (PEP) • Preliminary Project Management Plan (PMP) • Assumptions Document • Conceptual Design Report (CDR) • Baseline Range and Resource Loaded Schedule • Configuration Management Plan • Preliminary Hazard Analysis Report • Risk Management Plan and Risk Assessment • Value Management Documentation • Quality Assurance Program Documentation Director's CD-1 Review of the APUL Project

  12. Fermilab Project Management Documents • OPMO Procedures: http://www.fnal.gov/directorate/OPMO/PolProc/home.htm • FRA Earned Value Management System Description • 12.PM-001 Project WBS, OBS, RAM • 12.PM-002 Control Accounts, Work Packages, Planning Packages • 12.PM-003 Work Authorization • 12.PM-004 Project Scheduling • 12.PM-005 Cost Estimating • 12.PM-006 Monthly Status and Reporting • 12.PM-007 Change Control • 12.PM-008 EVMS Surveillance & Maintenance Director's CD-1 Review of the APUL Project

  13. Two Parts to the Review • Technical - Independent Conceptual Design Review • Cost, Schedule and Project Management Review Director's CD-1 Review of the APUL Project

  14. Technical – Conceptual Design Review • Design Reviews are performed to determine if a product (drawings, analyses, or specifications) is correct and will perform its intended functions and meet requirements. • The Conceptual Design process requires a mission need as an input. Concepts for meeting the need are explored and alternatives considered to arrive at a set of alternatives that are technically viable, affordable and sustainable. Director's CD-1 Review of the APUL Project

  15. Cost/Schedule Review Guidance Director's CD-1 Review of the APUL Project

  16. Cost/Schedule Review Guidance (Continued) Director's CD-1 Review of the APUL Project

  17. Cost/Schedule Review Guidance (Continued) Director's CD-1 Review of the APUL Project

  18. Cost/Schedule Review Guidance (Continued) Director's CD-1 Review of the APUL Project

  19. Cost/Schedule Review Guidance (Continued) Director's CD-1 Review of the APUL Project

  20. Cost/Schedule Review Guidance (Continued) Director's CD-1 Review of the APUL Project

  21. Subcommittee Assignments • SC1 – D1 Magnets • Jim Strait • Bob Kephart • Mike Harrison • SC2 – Cold Powering System • Claus Rode • ArkadiyKlebaner • Phil Martin • SC3 – Cost, Schedule and Project Management • Mike Lindgren • Fran Clark • Jeff Sims Note: Underlined names are subcommittee lead. Director's CD-1 Review of the APUL Project

  22. Reviewer Assignments Director's CD-1 Review of the APUL Project

  23. Reviewer Assignments (continued) Director's CD-1 Review of the APUL Project

  24. Reviewer Assignments (continued) Director's CD-1 Review of the APUL Project

  25. Reviewer Assignments (continued) Director's CD-1 Review of the APUL Project

  26. Reviewer Assignments (continued) Director's CD-1 Review of the APUL Project

  27. Reviewer Assignments (continued) Director's CD-1 Review of the APUL Project

  28. Reviewer Assignments for Breakouts Director's CD-1 Review of the APUL Project

  29. Reporting Structure • Review findings, comments, and recommendations should be presented in writing at a closeout with the APUL’s and Fermilab’smanagement. • Section for each “Level 2” WBS plus Cost, Schedule, Management sections. Director's CD-1 Review of the APUL Project

  30. Findings Comments Recommendations Findings are statements of fact that summarize noteworthy information presented during the review. Comments are judgment statements about the facts presented during the review. The reviewers' comments are based on their experiences and expertise. The comments are to be evaluated by the project team and actions taken as deemed appropriate. Recommendations are statements of actions that should be addressed by the project team. A response to the recommendation is expected and that the actions taken would be reported on during future reviews. Findings, Comments, and Recommendations Director's CD-1 Review of the APUL Project

  31. Examples of Findings, Comments, and Recommendations Finding • A plan for the MI upgrades was presented. The major elements of this plan consist of an upgrade of a MI quad power supply, which is nearly complete, and the addition of two more RF stations. The cavities to be installed currently exist as spares so there is no design and prototyping required. Comment • The project has decided to build the DCCT in-house. The committee supports this effort since the technology and design of this device is well developed and well known. Recommendation • Work with Fermilab management to acquire resources needed to complete the accelerator and beamline modifications. Director's CD-1 Review of the APUL Project

  32. Project’s Cost & Contingency Estimate Director's CD-1 Review of the APUL Project

  33. Reviewer Write-ups • Write-up template is posted on Director’s Review Webpage. http://www.fnal.gov/directorate/OPMO/Projects/APUL/DirRev/2009/07_16/CloseoutPresentationsDRAPUL07-17-09.docx • Write-ups are to be sent to Terry Erickson at terickson@fnal.gov prior to 12:30 PM on Friday, July 17 for the Closeout Dry Run • A final report will be issued within 2 weeks after the closeout. Director's CD-1 Review of the APUL Project

  34. Discussion • Questions and Answers Director's CD-1 Review of the APUL Project

More Related