520 likes | 681 Views
e -Preference: A Tool for Incorporating Patient Preferences into Health Decision Aids. Amar K. Das, MD, PhD Assistant Professor Departments of Medicine (Medical Informatics) and Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences Stanford University. Outline. Health decision aids Clinical example
E N D
e-Preference: A Tool for Incorporating Patient Preferences into Health Decision Aids Amar K. Das, MD, PhD Assistant Professor Departments of Medicine (Medical Informatics) and Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences Stanford University
Outline • Health decision aids • Clinical example • e-Preference approach • Prototype system and evaluation
Health Decisions in Aging • Older individuals often face complex health decisions involving significant risk of morbidity and/or mortality • Patient participation is desirable in such decisions • Clinicians’ ability to facilitate shared decision making varies
Health Decision Aids • Focus typically on • Improvements in patient knowledge • Explanation of treatment alternatives • Communication of risk
HDA Presentation • Non-interactive formats • Brochure (paper booklet or Web based) • Audiotape • Video • Interactive formats • Decision board • Computer • Multimedia
Outline • Health decision aids • Clinical example • e-Preference approach • Prototype system and evaluation
Atrial Fibrillation • Atrial fibrillation leads to a significant risk of stroke, ranging from 1% to 15% per year, based on patient factors • Anticoagulation therapy (warfarin) can reduce the risk of stroke by approximately two thirds, but incurs a risk of major bleeding complications of 1% to 3% per year
Measuring Preferences • Eight studies that modeled treatment preferences of patients with atrial fibrillation • Studies used three methods • Probability tradeoff technique • Decision aid • Decision analysis (Man-Son-Hing et al., 2005)
Audiobooklet (Man-Son-Hing et al., 2000)
Audiobooklet (Man-Son-Hing et al., 2000)
Audiobooklet (Man-Son-Hing et al., 2000)
Decision Analysis (Protheroe et al., 2000)
Decision Analysis (Protheroe et al., 2000) 17 on treatment 28 on treatment
Decision-Support Tool (Thomson et al., 2002)
Decision-Support Tool (Thomson et al., 2002)
HDA Limitations • Typically designed for one type of health decision • May not provide patient-specific information on alternatives and risks • May be only accessible in particular settings • Does not have readily modifiable design
Design Desiderata for HDAs • We need a design that can • Be tailored to specific health problems • Incorporate patient-specific data • Be accessible via the Internet • Be easily modified
Outline • Health decision aids • Clinical example • e-Preference approach • Prototype system and evaluation
Motivation for e-Preference • Create an environment for clinical experts and software developers to design and implement HDAs • Based on our research group’s long standing interest in developing customizable and reusable software architectures for decision support
EON Architecture End-User Application Problem-Solving Method Query Engine Patient Database Protocol KB Protégé
Design of e-Preference • A set of software methods for • Knowledge representation • Decision-analytic computation • Data access from existing database • Web-based multimedia presentation
e-Preference Architecture HDA Query Engine FLAIR Netica Patient Database KBDM Protégé
Knowledge-Based Decision Model • Encode concepts related to • Influence diagrams • Health decisions and outcomes • Risk factors • Patient preferences • Relationships between these factors
Aristotle’s Categories Supreme genus:SUBSTANCE Differentiae: material immaterial Subordinate genera:BODYSPIRIT Differentiae: animate inanimate Subordinate genera:LIVINGMINERAL Differentiae: sensitive insensitive Proximate genera:ANIMALPLANT Differentiae: rational irrational Species:HUMANBEAST Individuals:Socrates Plato Aristotle …
Web Ontology Language • A Semantic Web standard to use ontologies to represent knowledge on the Internet • OWL can be used to build ontologies of high-level descriptions, based on three concepts: • Classes (e.g., Influence Diagram, Nodes, Patient) • Properties (e.g., has_node, has_disease) • Individuals (e.g., “atrial fibrilaton”)
OWL Example Patient Influence Diagrams has_chance_node AF E. MyChart Nodes has_model has_diagnosis Diagnoses Decision Chance Outcome AF DM
Semantic Web Rule Language • A language for expressing logical rules in terms of OWL concepts • Rules in SWRL can be used to deduce new knowledge about an existing OWL ontology Patient(?pt) ^ has_dx(?pt, ?dx) ^ has_model(dx, ?hda) activate_HDA(?pt, ?hda)
Remaining Challenges • Modeling and editing probabilities in Protégé OWL • Generating interface based on modified influence diagram
KBDM Approach • Advantages • Ability to modify knowledgebase and create tailored decision model for HDA • Disadvantages • Efforts needed for acquiring and maintaining knowledge
Outline • Health decision aids • Clinical example • e-Preference approach • Prototype system and evaluation