400 likes | 564 Views
Federal Court System. District CourtsCourts of AppealsSupreme Court. Art. III, ? 2 ? Types of Cases. Cases ?arising under" Constitution, laws of the U.S. and treatiesCases affecting ambassadors
E N D
1. University of SzegedCivil Procedure Ken Kilbert
Associate Professor
University of Toledo College of Law
American Law Program
2. Federal Court System
District Courts
Courts of Appeals
Supreme Court
3. Art. III, § 2 – Types of Cases Cases “arising under” Constitution, laws of the U.S. and treaties
Cases affecting ambassadors & foreign officials
Admiralty & maritime cases
Cases involving U.S. as party
Cases between states (or state v. citizen)
Cases between citizens of different states
Cases between citizens of same state claiming lands under grants of different states
Cases between state/citizen & foreign nation/citizen
4. Federal Question Jurisdiction Art. III, § 2 – “The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties …”
28 USC § 1331 – “The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of all civil actions arising under the Constitution, laws or treaties of the United States.”
5. Well Pleaded Complaint Federal question must appear on face of complaint and be essential to P’s cause of action
Defense
Counterclaim
Removal
6. Diversity Jurisdiction Art. III, § 2 – Extends judicial power to cases … “between citizens of different states”
28 USC § 1332
Amount in controversy exceeds $75,000
Between citizens of different states
7. Corporate Citizenship For diversity purposes per 28 USC § 1332(c)(1), corporation is citizen of:
1) State in which incorporated, and
2) State where has “principal place of business”
8. Amount in Controversy Damages
Legal certainty test
Timing
Injunctive relief
Value to P or D?
9. Aggregation 1P v. 1D – All claims aggregated
Multiple Ps – Aggregate claims where Ps have single right or common undivided interest
Multiple Ds – Aggregate claims where Ds have common and undivided liability
10. Removal - 28 USC § 1441 “(a) Except as otherwise expressly provided by Act of Congress, any civil action brought in a state court of which the district courts of the U.S. have original jurisdiction, may be removed by the defendant or the defendants, to the district court of the U.S. for the district and division embracing the place where such action is pending.”
11. Supplemental Jurisdiction Court has jurisdiction over one claim, and extends jurisdiction to an otherwise jurisdictionally insufficient claim
By plaintiff = Pendent
By defendant = Ancillary
12. Supplemental Jurisdiction28 USC § 1367
Power to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over insufficient claim
Limits on power to exert supplemental jurisdiction where anchor claim is based on diversity
Discretion to decline supplemental jurisdiction
13. Venue – 28 USC § 1391 Diversity jurisdiction
If all Ds reside in same state, any district where one D resides
Where substantial part of events or omissions giving rise to claim occurred
Not diversity jurisdiction
Same as (a) above
c. D is corporation
d. D is alien
14. Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a) A pleading that states a claim for relief must contain:
Short & plain statement of grounds for court’s jurisdiction
Short & plain statement of the claim showing P is entitled to relief
Demand for relief sought
15. Ashcroft v. Iqbal Process for evaluating whether complaint satisfies Rule 8 standard:
Accept as true all factual allegations (not legal conclusions)
Factual allegations must state plausible claim for relief (not mere possibility of entitlement)
16. Defendant’s Response
Answer
Rule 8 (b) denials
Rule 8 (c) affirmative defenses
Preliminary Motion
Rule 12 (b)
Rule 12 (c), (e), (f)
17. Fed. R. Civ. P. 11 Subject to sanctions, attorney certifies pleading or motion:
Not for improper purpose
Legal contentions warranted by existing law or non-frivolous argument for change
Factual allegations likely to have evidentiary support
Denials of fact warranted
18. Fed R. Civ. P. 13 Counterclaim (D v. P)
Compulsory: Rule 13(a)
Permissive: Rule 13(b)
Crossclaim (D1 v. D2)
Rule 13(g)
19. Amendments – Rule 15 Certain early amendments are automatically allowed
Others “freely given” unless “undue prejudice”
Relation back
Statute of limitations
20. Joinder of Parties Rule 20 Permissive Joinder
Arise out of same transaction or occurrence
Rule 19 Compulsory Joinder
Necessary party – must be joined, if feasible
Indispensable party – case must be dismissed, if cannot be joined
21. Impleader or Interpleader? Impleader
Defendant joins Third-party defendant
Rule 14
Interpleader
Stakeholder joins multiple persons who have claim
Rule 22, 28 USC § 1335
22. Class Actions – Rule 23 Must meet all four (a) prerequisites
1. Class so numerous that joinder of all impracticable
2. Questions of law or fact common to class
3. Claims of reps typical of class
4. Reps will fairly/adequately protect class interests
Must meet one of (b) criteria
1. Separate actions would (a) risk inconsistent adjudications, or (b) impair interests of non-parties
2. Relief appropriate for entire class
3. Common questions of law or fact predominate
23. Discovery Methods Required Disclosures (Rule 26(a))
Depositions (Rule 30)
Interrogatories (Rule 33)
Requests for Production (Rule 34)
Physical & Mental Exams (Rule 35)
Requests for Admissions (Rule 36)
24. Scope of DiscoveryRule 26(b)(1) “[A]ny non-privileged matter that is relevant to any party’s claim or defense”
Need not be admissible at trial; just needs to be “reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence”
25. Work Product PrivilegeRule 26(b)(3) Qualified privilege for document prepared in anticipation of litigation: discoverable only if party has substantial need to prepare its case and is unable without undue hardship to obtain substantial equivalent
Virtually absolute privilege for mental impressions or opinions
26. Expert Witness TESTIFYING
Must provide report: Rule 26(a)(2)
May be deposed: Rule 26(b)(4)
NON-TESTIFYING
Discovery prohibited, absent “exceptional circumstances” : Rule 26(b)(4)
27. Enforcement of Discovery
Motion To Compel – Rule 37
Protective Order -- Rule 26(c)
Sanctions – Rule 37
28. Summary Judgment – Rule 56
Motion made after pleadings, before trial
Judgment granted where there is “no genuine issue as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law”
29. Seventh Amendment “In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved ….”
U.S. Const. amend VII
30. Types of Judgments/Relief Money Damages
Compensatory & Punitive
Equitable Relief
Preliminary Injunction, Rule 65
Declaratory Relief
28 USC § 2201, Rule 57
Costs & Attorney Fees
English & American Rules
31. Preclusive Effects of Judgments
Res Judicata – Claim preclusion
Collateral Estoppel – Issue preclusion
32. Alternative Dispute Resolution
Mini-trial
Mediation
Arbitration
33. Personal Jurisdiction:Traditional Bases
Citizen of forum state
Served while present in forum state
Consent
34. International Shoe Out-of-state corporation is subject to personal jurisdiction, consistent with due process, if has “minimum contacts” with forum state such that maintenance of suit does not offend traditional notions of fair play and justice
35. Specific & General Jurisdiction Specific – for suits arising from D’s contacts with forum state
Minimum contacts
General – for any suits, regardless whether arise from D’s contacts with forum state
Systematic & continuous contacts
36. Fair & Just Factors
Burden on D
Forum state’s interest
P’s interest
Judicial system’s interest
States’ shared interest
37. Evaluating Personal Jurisdiction Over Non-Resident
State long-arm statute
Due Process
Minimum contacts
Fair & just
38. Minimum Contacts
Stream of commerce
Intentional torts
Contracts
Internet
39. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(k)Territorial Limits of Effective Service
1(A) State long-arm statute
1(B) 100 mile “bulge” service
1(C) Federal long-arm statute
2 Federal question case, where foreign D is not subject to P.J. in any state court, but due process allows suit in U.S.
40. Full Faith & Credit
“Full Faith and Credit shall be given in each State to the public Acts, Records, and judicial Proceedings of every other State.”
U.S. Const. art. IV, § 1