1 / 10

Plant-Location Problem

Plant-Location Problem A new company has won contracts to supply a product to customers in Central America, United States, Europe, and South America. The company has determined three potential locations for plants. Relevant costs are:. Customer. Plant. Central America. 9. 30. 18.

cain-cardenas
Download Presentation

Plant-Location Problem

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Plant-Location Problem • A new company has won contracts to supply a product to customers in Central America, United States, Europe, and South America. The company has determined three potential locations for plants. • Relevant costs are:

  2. Customer Plant Central America 9 30 18 Brazil 9 7 5 United States 15 7 7 Philippines 25 4 6 Europe 20 3 4 Mexico 7 35 South America 12 9 Plant-Location Problem: Customer Demands and Shipping Costs Numbers on arcs represent shipping costs (in $100 per unit). Which plant location/shipping plan combination minimizes production and distribution costs?

  3. Plant-Location Model • Indices: Let B represent the Brazil plant, and similarly use P (Philippines), M (Mexico), C (Central America), U (United States), E (Europe), and S (South America) • Decision Variables: • Plant opening decisions: and define yPand yMsimilarly. • Production decisions: pB = # of units to produce in Brazil and similarly define pP and pM. • Distribution decisions: xBC = # of units to ship from Brazil to Central America, and define xBU , xBE , …, xMSsimilarly.

  4. Plant-Location Model • Objective Function: Total cost = fixed + variable + shipping costs Total fixed cost: FIX = 50,000 yB + 40,000 yP + 60,000 yM Total variable cost is: VAR = 1,000 pB + 1,200 pP + 1,600 pM . Total shipping cost is: SHIP = 900 xBC + 900 xBU+ 700 xBE+ 500 xBS • + 700 xPC+700 xPU + 400 xPE + 600 xPS • +300 xMC+ 400 xMU+ 700 xME+ 900 xMS .

  5. Plant-Location Model (continued) • Constraints: Plant-production definitions: There are constraints to define total production at each plant. For example, the total production at the Mexico plant is: pM = xMC+ xMU+ xME+ xMS This can be thought of as a “flow in = flow out” constraint for the Mexico node. • Demand constraints: There are constraints to ensure demand is met for each customer. For example, the constraint for Europe is: xBE+ xPE+ xME= 20. This is a “flow in = flow out” constraint for the Europe node. • Plant-Capacity Constraints: Production cannot exceed plant capacity, e.g., for Brazil pB 30

  6. Additional Constraints (continued) • If yB= 0 we want to rule out production at the Brazil plant • If yB= 1, the plant is open and its “available” capacity is 30 units per month • Let’s try this: pB 30 yB If yB= 0 then the constraint becomes pB 0. If yB= 1 then the constraint becomes pB 30. • Alternatively, if pB 0 (and yBcan only take on the values 0 or 1) then yB= 1

  7. Cost definitions: • (VAR Def.) VAR = 1,000 pB + 1,200 pP + 1,600 pM . • (SHIP Def.)SHIP = 900 xBC+ 900 xBU+ 700 xBE+500 xBS • + 700 xPC+700 xPU, + 400 xPE+ 600 xPS • + 300 xMC+ 400 xMU+ 700 xME+ 900 xMS • (FIX Def.) FIX = 50,000 yB + 40,000 yP + 60,000 yM • Plant production definitions: • (Brazil) pB = xBC+ xBU+ xBE+ xBS • (Philippines) pP = xPC+ xPU+ xPE+ xPS • (Mexico) pM = xMC+ xMU+ xME+ xMS • Demand constraints: • (Central America) xBC+ xPC+ xMC = 18 • (United States) xBU+ xPU+ xMU = 15 • (Europe) xBE+ xPE+ xME =20 • (South America) xBS+ xPS+ xMS = 12 • Modified plant capacity constraints: • (Brazil) pB 30 yB • (Philippines) pP 25 yP • (Mexico) pM 35 yM • Binary variables:yB , yP , yM= 0 or 1 • Nonnegativity: All variables  0 Plant Location Integer Programming Model min VAR + SHIP + FIX

  8. The Petromor Bidding Example • Petromor, the national oil company of a small African state, is selling unexploited land with good oil-extraction potential to private oil companies • For each piece of land (or zone, in the oil lingo), Petromor has projected the number of barrels that can potentially be extracted in this zone. • Petromor has organized a public bid in which private oil companies present sealed offers ($ per barrel) for the zones they are interested in buying

  9. The Petromor Bidding Problem • The companies present different bids for different zones. • If a company wins a certain zone, the final price it pays is determined by multiplying the offer in the bid by the zone's potential oil volume, as estimated by the government. • No oil company can be awarded more than one zone as a result of the public offering

  10. The Petromor Bidding Problem • Petromor would like to maximize the revenue resulting from these sales: Table 1. Bids (in $ per Barrel) A B C D E F Zone 1 $8.75 $8.70 $8.80 $8.65 $8.60 $8.50 Zone 2 $6.80 $7.15 $7.25 $7.00 $7.20 $6.85 Zone 3 $8.30 $8.20 $8.70 $7.90 $8.50 $8.40 Zone 4 $7.60 $8.00 $8.10 $8.00 $8.05 $7.85 Table 2. Zone potential (in # of Barrels) Potential Zone 1 205,000 Zone 2 240,000 Zone 3 215,000 Zone 4 225,000 What is the most profitable assignment of zones to the companies in this case?

More Related