340 likes | 352 Views
Explore ancient Guangala culture through textile imprint analysis on pottery sherds from Southwest Coastal Ecuador. Discover weaving techniques, fiber types, and trade networks of the pre-Colombian era.
E N D
Reconstructing Ancient Technology: The analysis of Pre-Columbian Ecuadorian Textiles
Project Objective • To uncover aspects of the Guangala culture through analysis of textile impressions on pottery sherds.
Introduction • The people of the Guangala region lived between 500 BC and AD 800 • Southwest Coastal Ecuador • No recorded history • Left artifacts with textile imprints
Background Information:Culture • Textiles played central role in pre-colonial South American cultures. • Textiles often showed status, identity, and had ceremonial implications. Mummy from Paracas, Peru
The Guangala (500 BC – AD 800) • No evidence of any social stratification. • Communities simply organized. • Evidence that they were long-distance traders. • Not definitively tied to any modern culture.
Textiles and Ceramics in the Guangala • The Guangala also used textiles in ceramics. • Textiles were usually recycled textiles, not textiles made specifically for ceramic production.
Background Information: Textiles • Important component of Textiles: Warp and Weft
Types of Plain Simple Weaves Balanced Warp-faced Weft-faced
Textile Characteristics to Find • Number of threads in the warp and the weft • Type of weave • The fiber type • Thread diameter • Number of threads per centimeter • Regularity
Method • Artifacts vs. experimental molds • Negative to positive images
Observation Techniques • Photography • Light microscope • SEM
Experimental • These are modern textiles of known material and technological processes. • Compared to artifacts.
The Artifacts • Artifacts range from Early Guangala (Artifact 5) to Late Guangala (Artifacts 1 and 3). • From El Azúcar Valley – varied sites.
Artifact 1 - Cast Excavated Floor
Artifact 4 - Cast Above: Artifact cast Below: Alpaca poncho Above: Weft dominant Below: Warp dominant
Artifact 5- Artifact, Casts
Conclusion • Hypothesis: Balanced Plain Weaves, irregularities, worn-down textiles • Actual: complex weaves with evidence of designs and color schemes • Conclusion: Sophisticated and Skilled • Alpaca fibers found although evidence suggests that there were no llamas on the coast • Trading System and Economic System
Acknowledgments • Thank you Dr. Masucci for your guidance and support as our project leader. Thanks especially for the food!!! • Thank you Danielle for your long hours of patience and dedication and for just being cool. Cabooyah! • Thank you Dr. Miyamoto for everything.
Works Consulted • [1] Masucci, Maria. Introductory Speech. New Jersey Governor’s School in the Sciences. Hall of Sciences, Drew University, New Jersey. July 2006 • [2] Boytner, Ran. 2004. Clothing the Social World. In Andean Archaeology, edited by Helene Silverman, pp. 130-145. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing • [3] Bruhns, Karen Olsen. The Story of a Sherd: The Second Oldest Textile in Ecuador. 12 July 2006 <http://username.sfsu.edu/~kbruhns/textile.html> • [4] Stothert, Karen E., Kathleen A Epstein, Thomas R. Cummins and Maritza Freire. “Reconstructing Prehistoric Textile and Ceramic Technology From Impressions of Cloth in Figurines From Ecuador.” Materials, Research Society, Symposium Proceedings., Vol. 185 (1991) pp. 767-776. • [5] Emery, Irene. The Primary Structures of Fabrics. The Textile Museum, Washington D.C.: 1966. p.10. • [6] Doyon-Bernard, Suzette J. La Florida’s Mortuary Textiles: The Oldest Extant Textiles From Ecuador. The Textile Museum, Washington D.C.: 1993-1994. pp. 82-102. • [7] Parker, JH and KE Stothert. Weaving a Cotton Saddlebag on the Santa Elena Peninsula of Ecuador. The Textile Museum Journal 1983; Vol. 22: pp.19-32. • [8] Rowe, Sarah Marie. Symbolic Function and Social Design: Analysis of Guangala Polychrome Ceramics from Coastal Ecuador. A Thesis in Anthropology, Drew University, New Jersey. May 2003. • [9] Bruhns, Karen Olsen. Ecuador’s Second Oldest Textile. The Textile Museum Journal 2001-2002. pp. 119-125.