390 likes | 678 Views
Chapter 5. Social Groups and Formal Organizations. Social Groups. A collection of two or more people who: Identify and interact with one another. Also: Share a sense of belonging. Have a feeling of interdependence. Categories and Aggregates. Categories share a similar characteristic:
E N D
Chapter 5 Social Groups and Formal Organizations
Social Groups A collection of two or more people who: • Identify and interact with one another. • Also: • Share a sense of belonging. • Have a feeling of interdependence.
Categories and Aggregates • Categories share a similar characteristic: • Students, elderly, Native Americans • Aggregates happen to be in the same place at the same time: • Airline passengers, shoppers, waiting at a traffic light
Reference Group • Influences a person’s behavior and attitudes, regardless of whether they are a member. • We may act more like members of a group we want to join than members of groups to which we already belong. • In this case, reference groups are a source of anticipatory socialization.
Anticipatory Socialization • The process by which knowledge and skills are learned for future roles
Group Leadership • Important element of group dynamics is leadership • Two leadership roles • Instrumental leadership • Expressive leadership
Instrumental Leadership • Group leadership that focuses on the completion of tasks • Make plans • Give orders • Get things done
Expressive Leadership • Group leadership that focuses on the group’s well-being • Less of an interest in achieving goals • Focus on promoting the well-being of members • Minimize tension and conflict among members
Three leadership styles • Authoritarian • Democratic • Laissez-faire Leadership
Authoritarian Leadership • Focuses on instrumental concerns • Takes personal charge of decision-making • Demands that group members obey orders • Wins little affection from the group • Is appreciated in a crisis
Democratic Leadership • More expressive • Includes everyone in the decision-making process • Less successful in a crisis situation • Draw on the ideas of all members to develop creative solutions to problems
Laissez-faire Leadership • Allows group to function on its own • “Laissez-faire” – French, meaning “leave it alone” • Least effective in promoting group goals
Group Conformity Conformity, Compliance, and Obedience
Sherif’s Conformity Research • Subjects in a darkened room were asked to look at a point of light projected on a black wall. • Although the point of light was stationary, observed believed the light began to move (the autokinetic effect).
Sherif’s Conformity Research • When individuals discussed their estimate of the movement of light with each other, they converged on a common standard or norm. • Although the data indicate that influence was present, subjects denied that they were influenced by others. • The more uncertain subjects were about reality, the more they were influenced by others, especially confident others. • Norms, once established by the group, were used by participants even when they were alone.
Asch’s Research • Asch’s research assistants tried to influence participants to pick Line 1 or 3 as the match for the line in the lower card. • Many (approximately 33%) went along rather than risk the opposition of the “group.”
Predicted Results • Experts/colleagues/students polled by Milgram predicted: • Less than 0.1% of subjects would give full dose of shock • Only 4% would give more than 300V • The majority would terminate the experiment before 150V
The Basic Experiment • The experimenter asked the teacher to begin teaching the learner a list of word pairs • At first, the learner did well, but then gradually made errors more frequently • The teacher found himself being asked to administer higher and higher shock levels • The learner increasingly objected to the shocks
Learner Response Voltage • 75 Grunt • 120 Loud Complaints • 150 “Get me out of here! I won’t be in this experiment anymore!” • 200 Screaming • 300 Agonized Screams • 400 Silence
Actual Results • 65% of teachers were fully obedient and administered shocks up to 450V. • By this point teachers were sweating, stuttering, or biting on their lip. • What caused this degree of obedience?
Milgram’s Obedience Experiment: Initial and Subsequent Results
Groupthink • The process by which members of a cohesive group arrive at a decision that many individual members privately believe is unwise.
Alternative Forms of Organization “Humanizing” the bureaucracy: • Greater sharing of power and responsibility. • Encouragement of participants to share their ideas and try new approaches. • Efforts to reduce the number of people in dead‑end jobs and to help people meet family responsibilities.
Informal Side of a Bureaucracy • Those aspects of participants’ day-to-day activities and interactions that ignore, bypass, or do not correspond with the official rules and procedures of the bureaucracy.