1 / 12

Master Teachers’ Guild

Master Teachers’ Guild . ATTENDANCE & LECTURE CAPTURE John H. Becker, Ph.D. 9/27/11. Types of Media. Audio recordings Video recordings With or without persons shown Computer capture E.g. Camtasia records Powerpoint slides and audio Projector capture Similar to above.

calida
Download Presentation

Master Teachers’ Guild

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Master Teachers’ Guild ATTENDANCE & LECTURE CAPTURE John H. Becker, Ph.D. 9/27/11

  2. Types of Media • Audio recordings • Video recordings • With or without persons shown • Computer capture • E.g. Camtasia records Powerpoint slides and audio • Projector capture • Similar to above

  3. Issues of Lecture Capturing (L-C) • Intellectual property rights • Yours • Anything you borrow and show and post • Pre-recording vs live recording +/- editing • Camera-shyness (for video) – onto You-tube? • Loss of interaction with students (Q&A may be gone) • But, near-universal student preference for L-C • Costs & technical problems • Commercial vs Freeware vs home-made • Attendance

  4. Literature on L-C and Attendance • Cardall 2008 paper –Harvard Medical School • Students • M1, D1, M2, & D2; N =353 • Surveys • 35 Likert-style questions • Special focus : • ability to accelerate video playback • Results • Attendance at live lectures • 48% regular, 34% variable, 18% rarely • Of all the lectures, how many did you view via: • 57% live, 29% video, 4% both, and 9% neither • Video viewing • 100% saw some lectures; 89% used the accelerator

  5. Cardall, 2008, continued • Most important reason for attending live lectures • 28% not motivated to view recordings • 18% show professionalism/respect to professor • 12% talk with classmates • 11% consumerism (value for tuition) • Other • Most important reason for NOT attending live lectures • 22% learning style that works for me • 20% can structure my own day • 20% can watch at my own pace • 14% can set my own learning priorities • other

  6. Cardall, 2008, cont. • Conclusions • Reasons don’t show a lack of commitment : choices are for their professional goals • Only 4% of lectures were viewed by both methods – so students are not using them much as supplements • Acceleration is a popular time-saver, and 65% said they used that saved time for school-related pursuits. • When given an option, students will vote with their feet.

  7. Paper #2 • Schreiber 2010 Imperial Medical College, London • Students • M3s, new Rheumatology didactic unit • Case/control randomized cross-over design • N=100, randomized 50:50, then go to other mode • Topics & Modes • Vasculitis and Arthritis, same professor, had printed notes • Live lecture and “video podcast” 15 minutes each, then Quiz of 17 MCQs • Immediately switch to the other unit, using the other mode • Survey • Rated content & retention, presentation, and pleasantness • Qualitative: free text comments • Results of Survey • All 4 presentations rated favorably or neutral • Live lectures slightly superior to podcast for content & presentation • 5-point scale, 1 is best: 1.2 for live; 1.5 for podcast

  8. Schreiber, 2010, continued • Results of Knowledge Assessment (Quizzes) • No significant differences • Qualitative comments on Podcasts • Pro = convenience (location & controls) • Con = less engaging, requires discipline to concentrate

  9. Schreiber, 2010, cont. • Conclusions • Students prefer live lecture to video podcast • Knowledge gains were similar • Students value Video for the convenience and ability to review • But Video is “less engaging”

  10. Literature • What other papers, seminars, blogs, etc have said: • Attendance suffers, but not too much • Other tools to insure attendance: • 10 day delay of post, active learning, in-class quizzes, points, stop recording if attendance falls below a benchmark • Other issues • Qatar Pharm: use video for teaching assessment & promotion • “Dress rehearsal” effect from faculty • Outcomes Assessment • Problems with surveys • Has anyone at RFUMS done attendance assessment? • See next talk

  11. New Technology and Attendance • What do you think? Home-schooled med students? • Audience debate

  12. Software that tracks viewings • 2011-09-04 2011-08-28 2011-08-21 2011-08-14 Total • User Actions • Browse 2802 3380 2080 2925 11187 • DownloadPreview 405 568 319 274 1566 • DownloadPreviewiOS 37 16 9 3 65 • DownloadTrack 2000 2502 1307 1013 6822 • DownloadTracks 1145 1278 363 232 3018 • DownloadiOS 93 60 19 14 186 • EditFiles 19 51 64 58 192 • EditPage 0 4 7 10 21 • Logout 5 15 16 32 68 • SearchResultsPage 8 17 19 18 62 • Subscription 0 0 0 0 0 • SubscriptionEnclosure 0 0 0 0 0 • SubscriptionFeed 0 0 0 0 0 • Upload 16 21 45 37 119 • Not Listed 0 0 0 0 0 • Total Track Downloads 3238 3840 1689 1259 10026 Dr C Brandon

More Related