1 / 14

SALDO: Developing a Model for the Design of CSCL

SALDO: Developing a Model for the Design of CSCL. Hans Ogg and Judith Schoonenboom. A real maze. Another fine (virtual) maze you’ve got us into. Straightforward design. Introduction. SALDO = SA menwerkend L eren D igitaal O ndersteund = Collaborative Learning Digitally Supported

calix
Download Presentation

SALDO: Developing a Model for the Design of CSCL

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. SALDO: Developing a Model for the Design of CSCL Hans Ogg and Judith Schoonenboom

  2. A real maze

  3. Another fine (virtual) maze you’ve got us into

  4. Straightforward design

  5. Introduction • SALDO = SAmenwerkend Leren Digitaal Ondersteund = Collaborative Learning Digitally Supported • Funded by the Dutch Digital University • One year project • Participants from 6 Dutch universities

  6. SALDO: a design model • Aimed at CSCL settings in which: • Students work together on • One of more assignments • Design model • Focuses on: • Choices of teachers in • Creating conditions for learning and their • Mutual influence

  7. Teachers’ choices

  8. The complete model Learning Act. SPECIFIC FORM OF CSCL Learning outcomes ICT LE Design LE Guidance Conditions

  9. Overall view: phases within the model

  10. Themes of teachers’ choices Assessment Group processes Assignment / products Task and role division Guidance

  11. Matrix: combining themes and work phases Phases in working on group assignment Themes

  12. First example of teachers’ choices

  13. Second example of teachers’ choices

  14. Advantages of the model for our purpose • Organizing advice on design choices found in the literature • Model is ‘complete’ with regard to design choices that are relevant to teachers • Dimensions irrelevant to teachers’ design choices are not included • Captures the dynamic and complex character of creating conditions for learning • Recognizes the contribution of student activities to creating conditions for learning

More Related