1 / 26

Blackjack: A Beatable Game

Blackjack: A Beatable Game. David Parker Advisor: Dr. Wyels California Lutheran University ‘05. Why is Blackjack Beatable?. Only game in a casino where the probabilities change from game to game.

calvin
Download Presentation

Blackjack: A Beatable Game

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Blackjack: A Beatable Game David Parker Advisor: Dr. Wyels California Lutheran University ‘05

  2. Why is Blackjack Beatable? • Only game in a casino where the probabilities change from game to game. • If a player can take full advantage of favorable probabilities, they might be able to win more money then the dealer over a period of time.

  3. Rules of Blackjack • Player(s) vs. Dealer • Object: Closest to 21 without going over • Card Values • Face Cards = 10 • Aces = 1 or 11 (Player’s choice) • 2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10 = Numerical value of card drawn.

  4. Rules of Blackjack Player Dealer

  5. Basic Strategy S = Stand H = Hit D = Double Down P = Split Pair Dealer Card Up Dealer Card Up Player Player

  6. How to Count Cards • Dr. Edward Thorp (1962) • High cards are good for the player. • Card Counting • Cards 2,3,4,5,6 are worth +1 • Cards 10,J,Q,K,A are worth -1 • Cards 7,8,9 are neutral and are worth 0 • Player keeps a running total of cards played in their head. Once the deck is reshuffled the count is reset to zero.

  7. The Truecount • Julian H. Braun (1964) • A high count becomes more beneficial to the player as the number of cards played increases. • A truecount of +8 after 8 cards have been played: • A truecount of +8 after 44 cards have been played:

  8. Truecount (Cont.) • Player still keeps track of count. • Player keeps track of total number of cards played. • Complete Count = Count divided by the number of decks have not been completely exhausted. • Truecount = Floor (Complete Count).

  9. Dealer Card Up Player Cards Final Player Cards Outcome Count Probability of winning at count Number of Cards Played Truecount Probability of Winning at Truecount Maple Simulation

  10. 6 Deck Shoe

  11. Betting Strategies • Thorp – Bet Count • Braun – Bet Truecount • Hi-Low • When the truecount is in the player’s favor (>2), bet 20 chips, otherwise bet 1 chip. • MIT Team • Pick a betting unit. • When there is a favorable truecount (>2), bet the [truecount x (betting unit)]. • Otherwise bet half the betting unit.

  12. Dealer Card Up Player Cards Final Player Cards Outcome Count Probability of winning at count Number of Cards Played Truecount Probability of Winning at Truecount Betting Consistently Thorp Braun Hi-Low MIT Blackjack Team Amount Bet Amount Won/Lost Total amount Won/Lost Maple Simulation

  13. Maple Simulation (Cont.) • Study was conducted with the same rules as if we were playing at a 5 dollar minimum Las Vegas blackjack table. • 6 deck shoe. • Single player vs. dealer. • Trials of 500 hands • 500 hands takes between 7.5 – 10 human hours to play.

  14. Normal Distributions10,000 trials of 500 hands -10.41 0.55 -5.87 -7.59 6.09

  15. Max Amount Won10,000 Trials of 500 Hands 95% Confidence Intervals

  16. Conclusions 6.09

  17. Conclusions • Hi-Low strategy wins the most money. • Chances of getting caught are high. • High Standard Deviation. • Need to buy 860 Chips.

  18. 0.55

  19. Conclusions • Hi-Low strategy wins the most money. • Chances of getting caught are high. • High Standard Deviation. • 860 Chips to Play. • MIT Strategy is the only other strategy in which the player wins money • Proven to work. • Good Standard Deviation. • 366 Chips to Play.

  20. Conclusions • Not many chips (0.55) earned for number of hours spent playing (7-10 hours). • Dealers are taught the betting strategies to spot card counters. • Casinos take measures to improve their odds. • Not allowing the player to double down with certain hands. • Dealer has to hit on 17. • Reshuffling with cards left in the shoe.

  21. However…. • Player has a 0.13% edge on the dealer! • 0.0013*500 = 0.65 • Better than all 6-deck strategies with the exception of the Hi-Low Method. • Recommendation: learn basic strategy and find a 1-deck game that reshuffles after every hand!

  22. Further Studies • Rules Variations • Player is allowed to re-split aces. • Blackjack pays 6-5 instead of 2-1. • Play at numerous tables. • Increase the number of players. • Various other card counting strategies. • Write an NSF grant to obtain funding to test findings in a Casino setting.

  23. References Baldwin, Roger, Wilbert Cantey, Herbert Maisel, and James McDermott. "The Optimum Strategy to Blackjack." Journal of the American Statistical Association 51.275 (1956): 429-439. Manson, A.R., A.J. Barr, and J.H. Goodnight. "Optimum Zero-Memory Strategy and Exact Probabilities for 4-deck Blackjack." The American Statistician May 1975: 84-88. Mezrich, Ben. Bringing Down the House. 1st ed. New York: Free Press, 2003. Millman, Martin. "A Statistical Analysis of Casino Blackjack." The American Mathematical Monthly Aug - Sep 1983: 431-436. Tamhane, Ajit, and Dorothy Dunlop. Statistics and Data Analysis. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall, 2000. Thorp, Edward. "A Favorable Strategy for twenty-one." Proc Natl Acad Sci Jan 1961: 110–112. Thorp, Edward. Beat the Dealer. 2nd ed. New York: Random House, 1966. Thorp, Edward. The Mathematics of Gambling. 1st ed. New York: Gambling Times, 1985. Larsen, Richard, and Morris Marx. An Introduction to Mathematical Statistics and its Applications. 2nd ed. Eaglewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, 2000.

  24. Special Thanks! • Dr. Cindy Wyels – California Lutheran University. • Dr. Karrolyne Fogel – California Lutheran University. • Dr. David Kim – Manhattan College. • Larry Coaly – California Lutheran University. • Bryan Parker – University of California Los Angeles.

More Related