180 likes | 234 Views
GLOBE Claritas™. Seismic Imaging in GLOBE Claritas. VELSECT : Automatic Velocities. High Density Velocity Analysis Picks made at every CDP, approx every 60ms Optionally constrained by top and base horizons Automatic Analysis Picked on high fidelity semblance spectra
E N D
GLOBE Claritas™ Seismic Imaging in GLOBE Claritas
VELSECT : Automatic Velocities • High Density Velocity Analysis • Picks made at every CDP, approx every 60ms • Optionally constrained by top and base horizons • Automatic Analysis • Picked on high fidelity semblance spectra • Spectra optimised in pre-processing • Runs efficiently in parallel • Editing and Smoothing • Geological constraints used for edits • Statistically robust (300,000+ VT pairs)
VELSECT : Stacking Results Manual Velocities : 2km spacing VELSECT Velocities • Very similar results – but improved (eg under channels) • 3000km of data picked over a weekend, automatically • Fast, accurate, repeatable and reliable
VELSECT : Interval Velocity Results Manual Velocities, Dix Inverted VELSECT Velocities, Dix Inverted • VELSECT results show more detail, better resolution • High velocity limestones resolved to two bands • Tied into wells and show good match with sonic-derived functions • Resolve coals from carbonates through velocity profile • Identify possible overpressure zones • Excellent for curved-angle calculations : AVA and Imaging • VELSECT : Automatically create VELocity SECTions
Solution : Imaging Under Channel, original Original post stack migration The channel creates a low velocity zone with steeply dipping sides that defocuses seismic energy. Imaging is severely disrupted under the channels. Channels are all across the prospect area.
Solution : Imaging Under Channel, PreSTM Pre-stack Time Migration using VELSECT velocities Solution is improved, but not complete. Ray path bending is not fully accounted for by the preSTM alone, and additional imaging is needed
Solution : Imaging Under Channel, PreSDM Pre-stack Depth Migration Complete solution. Modelled channel and near surface velocities successfully correct for the ray-path bending at the sea-floor, as well as the bright limestone event (approx 1500ms) Channel shape is unchanged in all cases – but the velocity variation is correctly modelled.
Solution : Imaging Under Channel, Velocity Model • VELSECT technique employed after preSTM • VRMS values converted to interval velocities • test lateral smoothing and use to depth convert • use smoothing which produces simplest depth image • secondary smoothing in depth • Run PreSDM as second imaging phase • Interpretation free preSDM modelling methodology
3.2km Cable Length 27.2km Total Length West East Shooting Direction Overthrust Tikorangi Limestone TRV-434 : structure Approximate Depth in metres Schematic of TRV-434 taken from previous depth imaging study Note the location and depth of the overthrust relative to the cable length
TRV-434 : Original Time Processing Imaging using a conventional late-1980’s sequence, with DMO and post-stack time migration. Sub-thrust imaging is poor; shot-receiver ray paths are complex and the simple DMO-Stack-Migration approach cannot resolve the structure. Sub-thrust imaging is confused, with broken, crossing events (circle)
TRV-434 : Modern Time Processing Imaging using a modern sequence that addresses spatial aliasing and employs two passes of pre-stack time migration Overall image is much cleaner, and imaging has improved considerably. A layered structure starts to appear, but is still smeared (circle). Pre-stack time migration still assumes the shot-receiver ray-path is symmetrical about the trace midpoint, however.
VELSECT : Raw Velocity Results RAW VELSECT velocities • trends can be seen • data is still noisy • cannot be used for stacking
VELSECT : Edited Velocities Edited VELSECT velocities • around 60% edited out • still 100,000+ picks • interval velocity editing • iterative approach
VELSECT : Smoothed Velocities Final VELSECT velocities • spatial frequency filter • extract low pass component • 1-2km radius filter • 10% spatial nyquist limit
VELSECT : Interval Velocities VELSECT Interval velocities (left) and preSTM data (right). The velocity field shows structure that matches the seismic image, and geological expectations
TRV-434 : ADMIRE Depth Imaging GNS Science’s Automatic Depth Modelling Iteration via RMS velocity Estimation (ADMIRE) approach creates a grid-based depth model that is ray-traced to produce an image Imaging is considerably improved with asymmetric ray-paths being managed correctly. Layer structure beneath the overthrust is now imaged sufficiently to resolve faulting, enabling detailed interpretation and analysis.
TRV-434 : Layer Based Imaging Vs ADMIRE Layer based pre-stack depth migration approaches use a layered earth model ASSUMES : layered earth represents the velocity structure accurately REQUIRES : detailed structural interpretation of each layer with each iteration - Time consuming, expensive and can result in model-driven solutions ADMIRE pre-stack depth migration uses a grid based model, created from the data ALLOWS: velocities to be independent of structure, and extremely complex REQUIRES : no structural model or interpretation, just careful quality control - Computer intensive, automatic and data driven 1480m/s 3750m/s 6000m/s Layer-Based Model ADMIRE Model
TRV-434 : Layer Based Imaging Vs ADMIRE Conventional Layer-Based Imaging ADMIRE Grid-Based Imaging Even after a large (13+) number of layer-based model updates the conventional depth imaging approach lacks the clarity and resolution of the ADMIRE image (with 5 model updates) Where seismic velocities are independent of sub-surface structure the ADMIRE approach produces a more accurate image, with less iterations, and no interpretation