230 likes | 357 Views
Evaluating the Effect of Safety Interventions on Taxicab Driver Violence. Cammie Chaumont Menéndez September 22, 2010. Study Purpose. Evaluate effects of: Cameras Partitions Provide usable data from a national perspective Guide policy. Study Logistics. Involves strong collaboration with
E N D
Evaluating the Effect of Safety Interventions on Taxicab Driver Violence Cammie Chaumont Menéndez September 22, 2010
Study Purpose • Evaluate effects of: • Cameras • Partitions • Provide usable data from a national perspective • Guide policy
Study Logistics • Involves strong collaboration with • City taxi regulators • Statistical units in police departments • Funding! • Travel
Study Logistics • Ethics review and approval • Data requests • Level of commitment (LOA, etc) • Data retrieval • Data availability
. Study Cities with Cameras
. Study Cities with Partitions
. Study Cities to Serve as Comparisons
Next Steps • Lay groundwork for data transfer • Conduct data extraction • Recruit more cities
Evaluating Risk Factors Associated with Violent Events Among Taxi Cab Drivers September 22, 2010 – Chicago, Illinois National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
Objectives of Taxicab Driver Survey • Determine whether taxicab cameras are associated with a reduced risk of robberies and injuries from assaults • Determine whether individual risk factors, safety training characteristics and taxicab driver behavior are associated with robberies and injuries from assaults
Study Design • Survey • Study population – licensed taxicab drivers in 3 cities (Houston, TX ; San Antonio, TX and Minneapolis, MN) • Administer questionnaire at time of license renewal • Incentive – gas card
Partners • Taxicab Regulators • Police Departments • IATR
Taxicab Driver Survey Protocol Timeline • Spring 2011 - Human Subject Review Board (HSRB) approval • Fall 2011 - Office of Management and Budget (OMB) approval • January 2012 - Start of study
Taxicab Security Camera System Evaluation StudyNational Institute for Occupational Safety and HealthDivision of Safety Research
Objectives of Camera Evaluation Study • Determine minimum requirements for taxicab camera system evaluation • Evaluate technological advantages and limitations of sample taxicab cameras in use • Determine research needed to improve taxicab cameras to maximize effect • Develop technical guidance for taxicab security camera selection and use
Status of Evaluation Study (1) • Completed study protocol • Protocol has been reviewed by stakeholders (IATR, TLPA, manufacturers and individual taxi-diver safety activist) • Protocol has been modified to address comments from stakeholders and NIOSH human subject review board (HSRB) • Protocol has been approved by NIOSH HSRB
Status of Evaluation Study (2) • Measured taxicab light intensities under 7 light conditions (daylight, overcast, very-dark cloudy, full dark, full dark with back-lit and sunrise/sunset with front-lit) • Collected sample taxicab cameras for test: FareView, DriveCam, AngelTrax, 3rdeyecam (JanusV2), VerifEye (G4 Single cam, G4 Dual Cam) and 247Security (in near future) • Purchased lighting and test equipment.
Protocol Procedures • Determine minimum requirements for Cab-Camera and Recorder • Evaluate taxicab camera systems using minimum requirements • Determine necessary future research for technical improvements and feasibility • Develop taxicab camera system selection guidelines
Some Procedure Details (1) • Determine minimum requirements for Cab-Camera • Reference camera takes photos of human subjects in 5 cab seats and 7 cab light conditions • Software manipulates photos to different photo resolution, dynamic range, motion blur and distortion conditions • Photo evaluators evaluate and vote for minimum requirements of photo resolution, dynamic range, motion blur and distortion based on facial image quality
Some Procedure Details (2) • Evaluate sample taxicab camera systems • Individual sample Camera takes photos of human subjects in 5 cab seats and 7 cab light conditions • Software determines photo resolution, dynamic range, motion blur and distortion parameters • Compare photo parameters with minimum requirements • Determine if the camera passes evaluation
Some Procedure Details (3) • Minimum requirements for reorder recording • Event triggers: door open/close, engine start/stop, meter start/stop, sudden acceleration/deceleration, panic button pushing, and voice (optional) • Record event images: 10 sec before event to 30 sec after event @ rate of >= 1 image/sec • Non-event recording: >= 1 image/minute • Retain >= 72 hrs of event and non-event images
Some Procedure Details (4) • Requirements for recorded data security and privacy • Software password or hardware key protected • Limited number of password /hardware key distributed by vendor • Software should be able to control the number of personnel who can access recorded data • Data log should be created whenever recorded data are accessed
Some Procedure Details (5) • Minimum requirements for recorded data storage durability • Enclosure resistant to damaging, removing or opening by small common tools • Fireproof: 300-320 degree C for >= 5 minutes • Waterproof: in water, under 5 meters for >= 72 hrs