1 / 37

Quasar Absorption Lines at High Redshift: Through a Glass Darkly

Quasar Absorption Lines at High Redshift: Through a Glass Darkly. Steve Furlanetto Caltech March 18, 2005. Collaborators: L. Hernquist, A. Loeb, S.P. Oh, M. Zaldarriaga. The Ly a Forest at High Redshifts. Ly a forest saturates at z~6!

Download Presentation

Quasar Absorption Lines at High Redshift: Through a Glass Darkly

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Quasar Absorption Lines at High Redshift: Through a Glass Darkly Steve Furlanetto Caltech March 18, 2005 Collaborators: L. Hernquist, A. Loeb, S.P. Oh, M. Zaldarriaga

  2. The Lya Forest at High Redshifts • Lya forest saturates at z~6! • What have QSO spectra taught us about reionization? • What can we pull out of QSO spectra at z>6? • Transmission spikes in Lyman-series • Metal absorption lines Becker et al. (2001)

  3. SDSS Quasars • SDSS J1030 (z=6.28) • No flux for z=6.2-5.98 in Ly or Ly • >9.9 (2mean effective value) White et al. (2003)

  4. J1030: Mean Properties • Measured  +IGM model  estimate of ionization rate (assuming uniform) • Appears to change more rapidly at z=6 • Difficult to constrain xHI because only probes deep voids • End of reionization? • Caveat: poor statistics! (Paschos & Norman 2004) Fan et al. (2001)

  5. Lyman-series Optical Depths Quasar • When integrating over large path length, must include cosmic web • Transmission samples unusually underdense voids • Requires model for density distribution! • Extremely difficult to measure xHI! • Different lines sample different densities Filament Visible in Ly Visible in Ly Observer

  6. Lyman-series Optical Depths • When integrating over large path length, must include cosmic web • Transmission samples unusually underdense voids • Requires model for density distribution! • Extremely difficult to measure xHI! • Different lines sample different densities Oh & Furlanetto (2005)

  7. SDSS Quasars • SDSS J1148 (z=6.42) • Transmission spikes in Ly, Ly troughs • Residual flux elsewhere • CIV absorber at z=5 • Ly emission lines (w/in 1000 km/s)? • Faint continuum? White et al. (2003)

  8. The Case Against AnInterloper: Residual Flux Ly at z=5 Residual flux (5) Flux White et al. (2003) • Transmission spikes abruptly stop at z=6.33 for Ly (Oh & Furlanetto 2005) • No continuum break past Ly for z=5 galaxy (Oh & Furlanetto 2005)

  9. The IGM Toward J1148+5251 Ly at z=6.33 Ly at z=5 Residual flux (5) Flux White et al. (2003) • Residual flux originates at quasar (Oh & Furlanetto 2005) • Allows measurement of  < 15.4 (2), likely ~7-11, at z=6.18-6.32 (uncertainty is in IGM density model) • IGM is still highly ionized! • SDSS J1030+0524 requires >9.9 (2) • Difference stronger where transmission spikes appear • Large cosmic variance in reionization!

  10. The Topology of Reionization 13 comoving Mpc z=8.74 • Simple semi-analytic models treat HII regions around individual galaxies • Simulations show clustering drives evolution! z=7.24 Sokasian et al. (2003)

  11. Bubble Sizes xH=0.96 xH=0.70 xH=0.25 SF, MZ, LH (2004a)

  12. Bubble Sizes: How Big? • For bubble to grow, ionizing photons must reach bubble wall • Mean free path depends on density structure of IGM (xH ~ 2) • Limit kicks in when R>10-30 Mpc (Furlanetto & Oh, in prep)

  13. QSO Spectra Flux White et al. (2003) • What are these transmission spikes? • Post-reionization features? • Voids? • Bubbles?

  14. For transmission: Must eliminate resonant absorption: pass close to ionizing source Must eliminate damping wing absorption: pass through large HII region For isolated galaxies, NO features before reionization (Barkana 2002) Transmission Spikes QSO QSO IGM HI

  15. QSO Absorption Spectra • Include clustering of sources: eliminate damping wing absorption • Curves have xH=(0.1,0.15,0.2,0.25) at z=6.1 • Simple model: • Includes inhomogeneous IGM • Naïve distribution of sources within bubbles • No recombinations • Can we probe mid/late stages of reionization with QSO/GRB spectra? Observed Feature SF, LH, MZ (2004)

  16. Studying the IGM Structure • Mean free path ultimately constrained by dense neutral blobs (?) • Left to right: max mfp=(10, 20, 30, 60, 600) comoving Mpc (all at xi=0.96) • Are we interpreting the tail end of reionization properly? SF, SPO (in prep)

  17. Complex Reionization Wyithe & Loeb (2003) • WMAP: ~0.17; reionization begins early • SDSS: reionization ends at z=6 • Reconcile through complicated source physics: Feedback!, e.g. • Photoionization • Minihalos • Metal Enrichment

  18. Complex Reionization:Metal Enrichment Reionization • Ejection by supernova winds is most likely mechanism • Regulates transition from Pop III (massive?) star formation to Pop II • Complex and extended • Highly inhomogeneous • New galaxies form Pop III stars, even late (?) • Extended  no sharp features in reionization • Extremely uncertain timing and extent Increasing Wind Efficiency SF, AL (2005)

  19. Metal Absorption Lines SDSS collaboration (1+zs)lLya (1+zs)lmetal  Can probe lLya/lmetal< (1+z)/(1+zs) < 1

  20. Metal Absorption Lines • Important lines: • Most abundant elements produced by Type II SNe: C (YCSN=0.1 Msun), O (0.5 Msun), Si (0.06 Msun), Fe (0.07 Msun) • Most abundant elements produced by VMS SNe: C (YCSN=4.1 Msun), O (44 Msun), Si (16 Msun), Fe (6.4 Msun) • Ionization states determined by radiation background and nearby galaxy  CII, OI, SiII, FeII for neutral medium  CIV, SiIV for ionized medium

  21. Methodology • One wind bubble per halo • Star formation history from extended Press-Schechter • Mechanical Luminosity provided by SN rate (and hence SFR) • Use thin-shell approximation (Tegmark et al. 1993) • All mass confined to spherical thin shell (no fragmentation) • Sweeps up all IGM mass • Driving force is hot bubble interior • Consider low-ionization states in spherical shells • Free parameters: f*, ESN, IMF, fw (and others)

  22. Wind Characteristics: Shell Radius • Points: Monte Carlo model • Solid line: Halo virial radius • R ~ E1/3 (at constant mass) • R ~ M1/5 (at constant f*) SF, AL (2003)

  23. Wind Characteristics: OI Equivalent Width • Crosses: z=20 • Dashes: z=16 • Triangles: z=12 • Points: z=8 • W ~ M/R2 ~ M3/5 • Strongest absorbers surround largest galaxies SF, AL (2003)

  24. Absorption Statistics • Scalo IMF, f*=0.1 • OI l1302 is shown • One absorption line per wind (no fragmentation) • Wtot depends on f*, shape depends on fw • Q~(10-4,10-3,0.01,0.1) z=8 z=12 z=16 z=20 SF, AL (2003)

  25. What Can We Learn? • z=8,f*=0.1 • Net absorption similar for low, high-ionization states • Reveals enrichment patterns, ionizing background (+clumping) • Hot gas will remain invisible: OVI < Ly • Identifying lines may be a challenge • Doublets straightforward • Others require several lines together? • And distinguish from noise! SF, AL (2003)

  26. What Can We Learn? • Some models require “prompt enrichment” by VMS stars in minihalos: Q~0.1-1 at high redshifts • Expect significant absorption, e.g. CII: ~0.16 (Z/10-2.5 Zsun) (1+z/7)3/2 • Actually expect forest of features from density structure • Do background sources exist?

  27. Metal Lines and Reionization • OI/HI in tight charge-exchange equilibrium • ~0.14 (Z/10-2.5 Zsun) for equivalent GP trough • Dense regions enriched first but ionized last  “forest” of (unsaturated) OI lines near reionization • Stretch into near-IR: sky lines difficult! Oh (2002)

  28. Summary • SDSS quasars indicate something dramatic happens at z~6, but its nature unclear • Huge cosmic variance between two lines of sight! • Models of reionization suggest variations in  on large scales • Allows transmission in QSO spectra when xHI<0.25: study transition from “bubble-dominated” to “web-dominated” universe • Other probes of topology: 21 cm emission, kSZ effect, Ly galaxies • Metal lines with >Ly must appear beyond reionization! • Trace course of enrichment (crucial piece of extended reionization) • “OI forest” at tail end of reionization • Expectations far from clear: hugely simplified models so far!

  29. The Case Against anInterloper: Transmission Spikes • If emission lines from intervening galaxy, should be extended source (>1 arcsec) • White et al. (2005) observed with narrowband ACS filter: point source! • z=5 galaxy does help clear Ly forest

  30. SDSS Quasars: “Proximity Zones” • Ly/Ly flux ratios • J1030 has region with Ly transmission but no Ly • Requires smooth damping wing component  xHI>0.1? (Mesinger & Haiman 2004) • Does not appear in J1148 • QSO redshift + edge of transmission  measure size of HII region? • Luminosity + lifetime  xHI>0.1 (Wyithe & Loeb 2004) • But see Yu & Lu (2004) White et al. (2003)

  31. The Topology of Reionization • Simple ansatz: mion = z mgal z = f* fesc Ng/b / (1+nrec) • Then condition for a region to be fully ionized is fcoll > z-1 Ionized IGM Galaxy Neutral IGM

  32. The Topology of Reionization • Simple ansatz: mion = z mgal z = f* fesc Ng/b / (1+nrec) • Then condition for a region to be fully ionized is fcoll > z-1 Ionized IGM Galaxy Neutral IGM

  33. The Topology of Reionization • Simple ansatz: mion = z mgal z = f* fesc Ng/b / (1+nrec) • Then condition for a region to be fully ionized is fcoll > z-1 Ionized IGM? Galaxy Neutral IGM

  34. The Topology of Reionization • Simple ansatz: mion = z mgal z = f* fesc Ng/b / (1+nrec) • Then condition for a region to be fully ionized is fcoll > z-1 • Can construct an analog of Press-Schechter mass function = mass function of ionized regions Ionized IGM Galaxy Neutral IGM

  35. Bubble Sizes: Why? • Mostly independent of redshift at fixed xH • Depends primarily on the bias of ionizing sources • Solid lines: f*=const • Dashed lines: f*~m2/3 xH=0.25 xH=0.8 SF, MZ, LH (in prep)

  36. Metal Pollution: Filling Factor • Different curves show f*=0.01, 0.1, 0.5, from bottom to top • Solid: H2 cooling • Dotted: Atomic cooling • Ignores galaxy clustering! FL03

  37. What Can We Learn? • z=8 • Solid: f*=0.5, f*=0.1, f*=0.01 • Dashed: vary fraction of SN energy in wind FL03

More Related