210 likes | 254 Views
This presentation at the TRB Conference in Houston explores the safety of HOV lanes compared to general freeway lanes, analyzing crash data from METRO and DPS sources. It identifies hot-spot locations, contributing factors to crashes, and tentative conclusions regarding safety. Future research suggestions are also discussed.
E N D
SAFETY CONSIDERATIONSHOV FACILITIES AND MANAGED LANESIN HOUSTON Suhag Kansara Ned Levine, PhD Houston-Galveston Area Council TRB Conference on HOV and Managed Lanes Houston, TX April 18, 2005
Purpose • Document crashes on HOV lanes • Compare safety of HOV lanes with General Purpose freeway lanes • Identify characteristics of HOV crashes
Data sources • METRO HOV crash data 2001-2004 • DPS freeway crash data 1999-2001
Hot-spot locations HOV lanes merging to freeway lanes
Hot-spot locations Direct access ramps merging with HOV lanes from park and ride lots
Hot-spot locations Design compromises in geometrical structure of HOV lane – shoulder width
Contributing factors • Single vehicle crashes HOV facility 30% Freeway facility 24% • Speeding HOV facility 53% Freeway facility 56% • Following too close HOV facility 5% Freeway facility 3%
Tentative conclusions • HOV lanes are safe • Design compromises can increase crash risk • Trade-off safety between barrier facilities vs. diamond lanes
Future research • Compare barrier facilities with diamond lanes • Who is involved in the crashes • Disproportionate number of males • Disproportionate number of persons in their 30’s and 40’s • Do certain groups have more difficulty with barrier facility?