130 likes | 402 Views
Qualitative Research. KNES 510 Research Methods in Kinesiology. Quantitative vs. Qualitative Research. Qualitative research originated in the disciplines of anthropology and sociology
E N D
Qualitative Research KNES 510 Research Methods in Kinesiology
Quantitative vs. Qualitative Research • Qualitative research originated in the disciplines of anthropology and sociology • Other terms include: ethnographic, cultural studies, interpretive, grounded, subjective, constructivist paradigm, naturalistic inquiry, phenomenological inquiry, postmodernism, postpositivism approach, post structuralism • There are many types of qualitative research!
Quantitative vs. Qualitative Research, cont’d • Quantitative research – design and variables are defined before data are collected • Qualitative research – design and variables are flexible
Some Characteristics of Qualitativeand Quantitative Research
Procedures in Qualitative Research • Define the problem • Formulate questions and theoretical framework • Collect data: • Training and pilot work • Selection of participants • Entering the setting
Major Methods of Collecting Data • Interviews • Individual/group • Formal/informal • Formal interviews generally use a pilot tested protocol • Focus groups • Observation • Use of field notes
Data Analysis • Data analysis is done during AND after data collection • This allows the study to change shape as data collection proceeds • Interpretation of the data may include an analytical narrative and narrative vignette • It may also include some elements of a quantitative analysis
Trustworthiness in Qualitative Research • Overall quality of results • Can be further broken down to two questions • Is it ethically conducted? • Is the study competently conducted?
Four Issues—Is the Research Competently Conducted? • Credibility—accurate description of the subjects and setting • Transferability—would the results be useful to those in other settings or conducting research in similar settings? • Dependability—how well the researcher dealt with change • Confirmability—could another individual confirm the results
Ways Researchers ProvideEvidence of Trustworthiness • Prolonged engagement with the participants and setting • Audit trail of changes during the study • Providing a thick description of setting and context
Ways ResearchersProvide Evidence ofTrustworthiness, cont’d • Clarification of researcher bias • is important since the researcher is the instrument • often is discussed in method section of thesis or research report • can’t control everything, but understanding bias and working to control it can help readers place faith in the results and conclusions
Ways ResearchersProvide Evidence ofTrustworthiness, cont’d • Triangulation of sources to support conclusions • Negative case checking to see if phenomenon is as pervasive as thought • Member checking to see if participants have information to add and agree with conclusions • Peer debriefing to have colleague challenge results and researcher provide support