220 likes | 228 Views
This article explores the relationship between interpregnancy interval (the time period between two consecutive live births) and low birthweight. It discusses the prevalence of low birthweight and the potential risks associated with short and long interpregnancy intervals. The study includes preliminary analyses using North Carolina birth certificate data from 2000. The findings suggest that extreme interpregnancy intervals are associated with low birthweight outcomes, and an interval of 18-23 months may be the optimal time between pregnancies.
E N D
Interpregnancy Interval and Low Birthweight: The Long and Short of It K. Simeonsson UNC-Chapel Hill March 9, 2003
Purpose • Define the problem of low birthweight (LBW) • Discuss interpregnancy interval as a risk factor for LBW • Describe preliminary analyses of study • Discuss public health implications
Prevalence of Low Birthweight, 2000 National Vital Statistics Report, 2002
Low Birthweight • Risk factor for perinatal mortality • Multifactorial problem • Short and long interpregnancy intervals (IPIs) as a risk factor
Interpregnancy Interval • The interval between delivery and conception • Calculated as the time period between two consecutive live births minus the gestational age of the index birth
Interpregnancy Interval and Low Birthweight Outcomes • Theories • Maternal nutritional depletion • Loss of growth-supporting factors • Previous research • Optimal interval between pregnancies • Zhu et al. 1999 & 2001, Fuentes-Afflick & Hessol 2000 • Extreme intervals • Associated with LBW • Zhu et al. 1999 & 2001, Knoshnood et al. 1998, Rawlings et al. 1995 • Associated with other perinatal outcomes • Shults et al. 1999, Klerman et al. 1998, Rawlings et al. 1995
Research Question • Does the length of time between pregnancies have an adverse effect on birthweight? • Hypothesis • Extreme IPIs will increase the odds of low birthweight outcomes
Methods • Source of data • North Carolina birth certificate data1 from 2000 • Total sample 122,550 • Exclusion criteria • Births to primagravid women (N=41793) • Births of multiple gestation (N=3219) • Births with missing data for date of last birth and gestation (N=10155) • Interpregnancy intervals < 0 (N=39) • Sample size 67,344 births for analysis 1 State Center for Health Statistics and the Odum Institute
Methods • Dependent variables • LBW (<2500 grams) • VLBW (<1500 grams) • Independent variables • Interpregnancy interval • Six groups of intervals, reported in months • Race • Maternal age • Maternal education • Tobacco use • Statistical analysis (SPSS)
Descriptive Statistics • Mean birthweight 3367 grams • Median IPI 29.4 months • Mean maternal age 28.0 years • Mean maternal education 12.65 years • Race • White 70% • Black 26% • Other 4%
Odds of Low Birthweight by Interval **p< 0.001
Odds of Very Low Birthweight by Interval *P< 0.05 **P< 0.001
Odds of Low Birthweight by Interval Interpregnancy Interval (months)
Adjusted1 Odds of Low Birthweight by Interval 1 Adjusted for race, maternal age, education and smoking * p<0.05 ** p<0.001
Adjusted Odds of Very Low Birthweight by Interval *p< 0.05 **p< 0.001
Adjusted Odds for Low Birthweight by Interval Interpregnancy Interval (months)
Conclusions • Extreme interpregnancy intervals are associated with low birthweight outcomes • Long interpregnancy intervals have the highest odds of low and very low birthweight outcomes • An interval of 18-23 months may be the optimal time between pregnancies
Limitations • Interpregnancy interval calculated from clinical estimate of gestation • Other potential confounders • Reproductive history of the mother • Adequacy of prenatal care • Births excluded for missing data
Implications • Interpregnancy intervals may be an independent risk factor for low birthweight • Further research • Determine independent effect • Analyze data for several years • Counseling of post-partum women • Optimal interval • Plans for contraception • Multidisciplinary approach