150 likes | 331 Views
FOREST ECOSYSTEM SERVICES Dr. Mohit Gera, IFS Faculty, IGNFA E mail: mohitgera87@gmail.com. OUTLINE …. Goods and services from forests Relevance to NLBI Payment for ecosystem services Case study results from India. GOODS AND SERVICES PROVIDED BY THE FORESTS. Goods Timber, fuelwood
E N D
FOREST ECOSYSTEM SERVICES Dr. Mohit Gera, IFS Faculty, IGNFA E mail: mohitgera87@gmail.com
OUTLINE … • Goods and services from forests • Relevance to NLBI • Payment for ecosystem services • Case study results from India
GOODS AND SERVICES PROVIDED BY THE FORESTS • Goods • Timber, fuelwood • Pulpwood • Food (tubers, flowers, seeds and gums) • Non-edible oils • Medicines • Fibers and flosses • Resins • Lac • Tendu and other leaves • Bamboos and canes • Fodder • Water • Services • Soil stabilization & erosion control • Ground water recharge • Regulation of climate by trapping moisture • Trees trap PM & improve air quality (human health) • Biological diversity • Habitat for wildlife • Nutrients re-cycling • Recreation & tourism • Maintenance of visual quality of environment. • Carbon sink & sequestration
Relevance to NLBI • The national policies and measures of NLBI essentially cover the following: • Encourage recognition of the values, particularly the intangible values from forests as well as from Trees outside Forests. • Explore ways to reflect such values in market place in line with the national policies and the legislation. • (Domestic markets may be more rewarding than the international market; Explore vigorously the domestic markets) • 3. Developing effective financing strategies for SFM. • 4. Enhanced access to local population to forest resources and relevant markets.
Water services Supply of services: Upstream land uses affect the Quantity, Quality, and Timing of water flows Introduction to payments for environmental services Adopted from Stefano Pagiola & Gunars Platais, 2005
Water services • Demand for services: • Possible downstream beneficiaries: • Domestic water use • Irrigated agriculture • Fisheries • Recreation Introduction to payments for environmental services
The problem Deforestation and use for pasture Costs to downstream populations Conservation Benefits to land users Introduction to payments for environmental services
The logic of payments for environmental services Deforestation and use for pasture Conservation with payment for service Payment Costs to downstream populations Conservation Benefits to land users Introduction to payments for environmental services Important! This logic is repeated every year » Need annual payments » Need sustained financing
What is Payment for Ecosystem Service ? PES is a voluntary transaction where There is a well-defined Ecosystem Service is being 'bought' by a (minimum one) ES buyer from a (minimum one) ES provider if and only if the ES provider secures ES provision (conditionality). The core idea of PES is that external ES beneficiaries make direct, contractual and conditional payments to local landholders for adopting practices that secure ecosystem conservation and ensure uninterrupted flow of ES in question.
BENEFICIARY PAYS PRINCIPLE Examples of ecosystem services in demand • Recreational value • Air quality improvement (urban demand) • Watershed protection (Water, soil conservation) • Biodiversity conservation • Carbon sinks Need for creation of a system of localized payments for these ecosystem services from forests. This may prove to be a long term & sustainable solution to financing SFM in India.
AVAILABLE LITERATURE ON TCM STUDIES FROM INDIA • Valuation of biodiversity in KNP : Rs 427.04/- (average consumer surplus, Chopra et al.) • Rs. 194.68 was calculated to be average recreational benefit per visit for VOF National Park (Gera et al., 2003)
CVM STUDIES CONDUCTED IN INDIA • WTP for annual Recreational benefits of Bhoj wetland – Rs 241/hh. • WTP for Maintenance and preservation of Borivili National Park – Rs 90 per hh. • Aggregate benefits to urban literate & employed people when the water quality of river Ganges improves from present to bathing quality – Rs. 500.02 per hh
CVM STUDIES CONDUCTED IN INDIA contd… • Valuation of Terai forests of Yamuna sub-basin, 40 districts (Hills, plains & foot hills) for the services of recreation, biodiversity conservation and nutrient cycling etc. Average WTP = Rs. 519.87 per hh/year
CONCLUSION • Why should a forest be assigned a value when it is slated to be lost? • “Beneficiary pays principle” • Payment for Environmental Services may be the key. • We should have a mechanism in place for localized payments to ES providers.