490 likes | 510 Views
How Bad is “Good Enough”? Mass Digitization of Photographic Archives. James Eason The Bancroft Library University of California at Berkeley. My Context. Is mass digitization an answer?. Photographs: Considerations for Scanning Strategies. Perceived value(s) Preservation needs
E N D
How Bad is “Good Enough”?Mass Digitization of Photographic Archives James Eason The Bancroft Library University of California at Berkeley
Photographs: Considerations for Scanning Strategies • Perceived value(s) • Preservation needs • Reproduction is key to use • Description: more detail justified? • Concept of “archival evidence”
Low-Cost Approach • Scan everything (no selection) • Minimal keying of existing sleeve data • Batch processing • No image adjustment • No quality control review! • Batch validation (automated scripts)
Cost/Quality Compromise • 800 ppi resolution (for 4 x 5 in.) • 16 bit grayscale (not 8 bit)
Low-Cost ApproachResults 21,000 negatives scanned $1.50 to $3.00 per image
Case Study The San Francisco Examiner Newspaper Photograph Archive at The Bancroft Library, U.C. Berkeley
San Francisco Examiner News Archive • Over 3.5 million negatives • 70,000 of these are nitrate film (4x5 in.) • 1.5 million or more are acetate
Priorities • Preservation (triage & storage environment) • Access • Long term preservation plan (with support from NEH)
What is “Doing it Right”??? “Preservation reformatting” is ill-defined in the digital age
Mass Digitization as a Tool • Access • Curatorial assessment & appraisal • Preservation? • Assessment • Preserve context
Vendor List sleeves Ship off-site Raw scans + basic metadata returned Batch validation Batch derivatives Load to server Students List sleeves & items Scan in office Raw scans, key data while scanning Batch validation Batch derivatives Load to server Two Work-flows Tested
What did we get for our effort? (Or, “How bad is good enough?”)
Is that all? (No, actually): • Serviceable production masters • Curatorial review tool • Strategic preservation strategy • Context & archival evidence (all) • Selected images (very few)
Preservation Strategy What will we preserve? Full aesthetic value? Context and basic information? • Select for Preservation Reformatting 5 % ? 2 % ? • Recorded archival context of the whole • Consider film-from-digital for entirety of nitrate files
High res (1200 ppi +) High bit depth Huge file sizes Manually adjusted Quality control $12-$18 / image High-ish res (800 ppi) High bit depth (16 bit) Large-ish files (22 MB) Batch processed Batch validation $1.50-$3 / image ReiterateComparison of Scan Approaches
What’s Next? • User interface • Assess impact • More funding to continue • Further assessment of film output approaches
Appendix User interface examples