1 / 51

Integrating Acceptance-based Behavior Therapy into Exposure-based therapy for PTSD

Integrating Acceptance-based Behavior Therapy into Exposure-based therapy for PTSD. Acknowledgments. Susan Orsillo, PhD Suffolk University Lizabeth Roemer, PhD University of Massachusetts, Boston. The third wave. Behavior Therapy Cognitive Therapy Acceptance-based models

Download Presentation

Integrating Acceptance-based Behavior Therapy into Exposure-based therapy for PTSD

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Integrating Acceptance-based Behavior Therapy into Exposure-based therapyfor PTSD

  2. Acknowledgments Susan Orsillo, PhD Suffolk University Lizabeth Roemer, PhD University of Massachusetts, Boston

  3. The third wave • Behavior Therapy • Cognitive Therapy • Acceptance-based models • Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) • Mindfulness-based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT) • Acceptance-based Behavior Therapy for GAD • Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT) • Integrative Behavioral Couple Therapy (IBCT) • Behavioral Activation (BA) • Functional Analytic Psychotherapy (FAP) • Mindfulness-based Relapse Prevention (MBRP)

  4. An etiological model of PTSD • Generalized psychological vulnerability • Generalized biological vulnerability • Experience of trauma • Developed by classical conditioning • Maintained by operant conditioning • Anxious apprehension • Avoidance or numbing of emotional response • Moderated by social support and ability to cope (Keane & Barlow, 2002; Keane, Marshall & Taft, 2006)

  5. Evidence-based psychological treatments for PTSD • General aims • Extinction of conditioned fear and anxiety responses through repeated, non-reinforced exposure to CS • Development of alternative, competing responses to anxiety and fear • Emphasis on symptom reduction through mastery experiences and internal control strategies

  6. Evidence-based treatments • Exposure Therapy • Anxiety Management Training (AMT) • Combination treatments (Foa, Keane & Friedman, 2000; Keane et al, 2006; Roth & Fonagy, 2005)

  7. Exposure Therapy • Patient is guided through a vivid remembering of the trauma until extinction occurs • Goal is to reduce avoidance of anxiety and promote control/mastery over trauma-related cues (Foa and Rothbaum, 1998)

  8. Anxiety Management Training • Package of behavioral and cognitive strategies to reduce and control anxiety • Progressive muscle relaxation • Diaphragmatic breathing • Cognitive restructuring • Communication skills training • Time management • Anger management/assertion training (Meichenbaum, 1994)

  9. Combination treatments • Package of CT, exposure and emotion regulation skills • Essential components of CT • Self-monitoring • Identification and labeling of thoughts and associated emotions • Cognitive restructuring • Changing the content of a ‘dysfunctional’ cognition through logical analysis • Hypothesis testing • Conducting behavioral experiments to evaluate the validity of dysfunctional thoughts

  10. Combination treatments • Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT) • Written exposure trials • cognitive restructuring of trauma related erroneous cognitions and schemas, particularly regarding safety, trust, power, control, self-esteem and intimacy • STAIRS • Emotion regulation and distress tolerance skills • Prolonged exposure • CSA related PTSD (Resick et al. 2002; Cloitre et al., 2002)

  11. The good news about EBTs for PTSD • Treatments are efficacious when compared to TAU, wait list control and active placebo treatments • 67% of completers no longer meet criteria for PTSD • 56% of intent-to-treat patients no longer meet criteria for PTSD • Exposure and CBT are generally equally efficacious (Bradley, 2005)

  12. Limitations of current treatments • 44% of intent-to-treat patients continue to meet criteria for PTSD (Bradley, 2005) • Using DSM criteria as treatment outcome may not be relevant to clinically significant change • Generalization of findings limited by study exclusion rates averaging 30% • Co-morbid Axis I disorder • Current substance abuse • Suicidal ideation or behavior

  13. More limitations • Relative lack of effectiveness research • RCTs generally compare monotherapies and not multimodal therapies • lack of evidence regarding long-term maintenance of gains • Vast majority of community sample patients do not receive EBTs • Due to lack of dissemination • Due to lack of treatment acceptance by patients

  14. And still more • Lowest effect sizes for patients with combat-related PTSD compared to other traumas • Focus on symptom reduction and not functional improvement • Interpersonal relationships • Vocational functioning • General quality of life

  15. Limitations specific to CBT • Relatively difficult to train therapists to adherence (Kohlenberg, 2004; Dimidjian et al, 2006) • Emphasis on control and mastery strategies can have paradoxical effect in anxiety disorders (Roemer & Borkovec, 1994)

  16. Limitations specific to exposure • Requires memory of a specific trauma event • May have low acceptability to patients and providers • PTSD patients have more negative attitudes toward emotional expression • Exposure less effective for patients: • High levels of anger at pre-treatment • High levels of avoidance at pre-treatment • Perpetrators of harm who experience guilt/shame as primary symptoms

  17. Potential limitations of standard therapies for OIF/OEF veterans • Stigma associated with mental health care • Reluctance to participate in exposure • Presence of co-morbid conditions • Lack of a single traumatic event • Associated feelings of guilt, loss, anger, sadness, grief • Potential for iatrogenic effects of exposure

  18. The challenge in treating OIF/OEF veterans • How do we provide secondary prevention? • Proper treatment may help prevent the development or progression of symptoms, or the underlying mechanisms leading to pathology(Zatzick et al. 2004) • what are these mechanisms? • What is the natural course of resilience, remission and recovery? (Bonanno 2004) • How can we use current treatments in secondary prevention? • How can we adapt or elaborate on these treatments for use with recently returned veterans?

  19. Spectrum of Post-Deployment Mental Disorders (N = 46,571) Disorder N % PTSD 20,638 44% Drug Abuse 17,768 38% Depression 14,317 31% Neurotic Disorders 11,481 25% Affective Psychosis 7,460 16% Alcohol Dependence 3,116 7% Acute Stress Reaction 1,327 3% VHA Office of Public Health and Environmental Hazards, February 14, 2006

  20. The cautionary tale of Critical Incident Stress Debriefing (CISD) • Intervention intended as secondary prevention for occupational trauma exposure (Mitchell 1983;1993) • Proprietary; dramatic claims of effectiveness • Basic assumptions • Exposure to traumatic stressor is sufficient to cause symptoms that can escalate to a pathological condition • Early and proximal intervention involving emotional catharsis (exposure) is prophylactic

  21. CISD procedures • Format • Group administration • Delivered by a mental health provider assisted by non-professional peers • Conducted in one 2-3 hour session within 24-72 hours of traumatic event • Mandatory attendance customary • Non-attendees or drop-outs typically retrieved by peer facilitator

  22. CISD treatment protocol • Introduction of the debriefing • Statement of facts regarding the traumatic event • Disclosure of thoughts regarding the event • Disclosure of emotional reactions, with focus on strong negative affects • Specification of possible symptoms • Education regarding consequences of trauma exposure • Planned re-entry to social environment (Mitchell & Everly, 1993)

  23. CISD outcome research • No clinically significant improvement for participants at long-term follow-up • Slight but statistically significant worsening on outcome measures for those accepting debriefing • Preference for informal sources of support and assistance correlated strongly with improved outcome • Those with highest levels of both avoidance and intrusive recollection deteriorated most after debriefing; recovery better among those not receiving treatment (Mayou et al. 2000) • “CISD is inert at best and iatrogenic at worst” (Lohr et al. 2003)

  24. An etiological model of PTSD • Generalized psychological vulnerability • Generalized biological vulnerability • Experience of trauma • Developed by classical conditioning • Maintained by operant conditioning • Anxious apprehension • Avoidance or numbing of emotional response • Moderated by social support and ability to cope (Keane & Barlow, 2002; Keane, Marshall & Taft, 2006)

  25. Approaches to providing secondary prevention • Watch and wait • Respect the natural course of recovery among the resilient • Support naturally occurring restorative factors in patient’s life • Provide supportive treatments that do not interfere with natural resilience and are not iatrogenic • Wellness • Provide treatments that enhance naturally occurring restorative factors • Example: Behavioral Activation (BA)

  26. Secondary prevention approaches • Rehabilitation • Support naturally occurring curative factors in patient’s life + • Provide treatments that prevent or inhibit pathological mechanisms implicated in the development and maintenance of psychological distress • Experiential avoidance • Co-morbid conditions that serve the function of experiential avoidance, especially SUDs and rumination

  27. Acceptance-based Behavior Therapy (ABT) • Standard therapies • Based on a conditioning model of PTSD • Aim is to reduce fear and anxiety through extinction • Coupled with strategies to change trauma-related thought content • An alternative model • PTSD can be understood as a disorder of experiential avoidance(Hayes et al. 1999) • Aim is to improve quality of life • Coupled with strategies to change the process of cognition rather than the content (Orsillo & Batten 2005; Batten et al. 2005; Follette et al. 2004)

  28. Experiential avoidance • Attempts to change the form or frequency of internal events (thoughts, feelings, memories, sensations) (Hayes et al. 1996) • EA contributes to the development and maintenance of various forms of psychopathology, particularly anxiety disorders • Anxiety disorders develop when individuals are unwilling to experience anxiety (and associated thoughts, images, distressing emotions)

  29. A variety of external and internal control strategies are utilized to alleviate distress via escape and avoidance Behavioral avoidance of situations and cues (CS) that elicit unwanted internal states (CR) Cognitive control strategies to avoid unwanted states Thought suppression Worried rumination Distraction Internal and external control strategies are negatively reinforced External control strategies generalize lead to disengagement with the naturally rewarding contingencies in the environment Internal control strategies generalize Become rigid and inflexible Lead to narrowing of attention Control strategies maintain distress / cause rebound

  30. Thought suppression • Effortful suppression of thoughts • Initially relieves distress • Has paradoxical long-term effect with rebound of avoided imagery • Leads to escalating efforts to control and master thoughts and imagery • Thought suppression associated with negative tx outcome (CSA, rape, MVA, Gulf War, urban violence) • Behavioral therapies have been adapted to specifically target experiential avoidance as a core feature of pathology • (Borkovec et al. 2004)

  31. Acceptance-based Behavior Therapies (ABT) • Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT)(Hayes et al. 1999, 2004; Eifert & Forsyth, 2005) • Mindfulness-based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT)(Segal et al. 2002) • Acceptance-based Behavior Therapy for GAD(Roemer& Orsillo, 2004, 2005) • Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT)(Linehan, 1993) • Integrative Behavioral Couple Therapy (IBCT)(Jacobson & Christensen, 1996) • Behavioral Activation (BA)(Jacobson et al. 1996; Dimidjian et al. 2006) • Functional Analytic Psychotherapy (FAP)(Kohlenberg & Tsai, 1991; Kohlenberg et al. 2004) • Mindfulness-based Relapse Prevention (MBRP)(Marlatt et al. 2005)

  32. Acceptance-based Behavior Therapy (ABT) • Basic assumptions • Treatment components • Treatment strategies and techniques

  33. ABT assumptions • Emotions are just emotions; thoughts are just thoughts; memories are just memories • Emotions are information; not good or bad • Control of internal events is not an option • Control is the problem, not the solution

  34. Similarities to Exposure/CBT • Both consider avoidance to be a core feature of pathology • Both advocate approach as an integral treatment strategy

  35. Differences from Exposure/CBT • Approach and avoidance • Approach behaviors are inherently valuable • Approach behaviors are pragmatically valuable in order to reengage with natural reinforcers and expand domains of functioning • Emphasis on clinically valued change rather than symptom reduction

  36. Differences • Attention • CBT emphasizes directing attention toward stimuli associated with disorder (or distract from) • ABT emphasizes directing attention broadly toward flow of experience

  37. Differences • Cognition – radically different understanding of the role of cognition in development and treatment of disorders • Cognitions are causal vs. cognitions are responses • Importance of content vs. importance of function • Goal to change content vs. goal to change relationship to one’s own thoughts and feelings

  38. Differences • Control within the CBT framework • Lack of perceived control and unpredictability strongly associated with distress (Mineka et al. 2006) • Control/predictability can be increased by • Attending to thoughts and associated emotions • Changing thoughts from irrational to rational • Through process of logical analysis and behavioral experimentation

  39. Differences • Control within the ABT framework • Efforts to exert internal control maintain distress • Thoughts and emotions are transitory experiences of the mind and body • Treatment provides experiential learning of acceptance rather than control • Distress naturally wanes as a consequence of not being escalated by control strategies (e.g., MBCT)

  40. ABT treatment components • Overarching goals • Target experiential avoidance and expand experiential acceptance • Target associated behavioral restrictions and expand engagement with valued life goals and activities • 1. Psychoeducation • 2. Assessment • 3. Experiential acceptance • 4. Valued action

  41. 1. Psychoeducation • Role of emotions as information (Linehan 1993) • Limits and costs of control strategies (Roemer & Orsilllo 2004) • Importance of approach and emotional engagement in therapy sessions (Jaycox et al. 1998)

  42. 2. Assessment • General assessment • Symptom review and diagnostic assessment • Self-report measures • PTSD • Anxiety • depression • Self-report functional measures • Life satisfaction • Valued life domains (Roemer & Orsillo, 2004; Orsillo & Batten, 2005)

  43. 2. Assessment • Avoidance and suppression • Self-report measures of experiential avoidance and thought suppression (Hayes et al. 2006; Eifert & Forsyth, 2005) • Acceptance and Action Questionnaire (AAQ) • White Bear Suppression Inventory • Thought Control Questionnaire • Values assessment • Self-report measures to identify idiographic treatment outcomes (Hayes et al. 1999, Eifert & Forsyth, 2005) • Generate values • Rate values to establish priorities • Identify intermediate steps, actions and barriers

  44. 3. Experiential acceptance • Mindfulness • Targets identification of thoughts/feelings as ‘reality’ • Willingness • Encourages approach behaviors • Distress tolerance skills • Targets avoidance due to inability to tolerate emotion • Emotion regulation skills • Targets avoidance due to inability to modulate emotion

  45. Key concepts in Mindfulness • Decentering • Experiencing thoughts and feelings as mental events and not reality • Early problem recognition • Intentional awareness allows “turning toward” difficulties • Anti-ruminative • Experience is of current awareness, not elaborate thinking about implications, meaning, etc. • Generic skill • Daily practice competes with development of avoidance, escape and control strategies (Segal et al, 2002)

  46. Steps in Mindfulness training • Practice attention to a single sense • Practice attention to the flow of experience • Practice attention to thoughts, feelings, images as part of the flow of experience • Practice attention to the flow of experience during activities

  47. Mechanisms of Mindfulness • Exposure to previously avoided classes or categories of emotional experience, leading to decreased distress via extinction • Self-monitoring associated with improved appraisal of actual contingencies, leading to increased flexibility in responding • State of relaxation (response prevention) • Change in attitude toward internal experiences leads to decreased volatility (Baer, 2003; Teasdale et al. 2002; Segal et al. 2002)

  48. 4. Valued action • Assessment questions • What is important to the patient? • To what extent are they living life in accordance with their values? • How do their symptoms interfere with the pursuit of their values?

  49. 4. Valued action • Intervention techniques • Writing exercises to clarify values • Self-monitoring to assess degree to which life is spent in valued activities (and/or degree to which patient is emotionally engaged in valued activities) • Goal setting • Identify concrete steps intermediate to valued activities • Commit to plan • Identify potential barriers • Review previous goals (Roemer & Orsillo, 2004; Eifert & Forsyth, 2005; Orsillo & Batten, 2005)

  50. Integrating Exposure Therapy • Exposure sessions for specific events as well as classes of emotion • Goal is acceptance rather than extinction • Therapist must be practiced in approaching emotional experience, and mindful of not colluding with patient in experiential avoidance • Therapist must be capable of achieving the metacognitive state of ‘engaged observation’

More Related