400 likes | 569 Views
THE CERN Experiment NA62 for Rare Kaon Decays. Massimo Lenti INFN Sezione di Firenze. Outline of the presentation. Physics motivations for K + → p + nn The beam The main background channels The apparatus The signal acceptance and S/B Time schedule and Conclusions. Kaon Physics.
E N D
THE CERN Experiment NA62for Rare Kaon Decays Massimo Lenti INFN Sezione di Firenze
Outline of the presentation • Physics motivations for K+→p+nn • The beam • The main background channels • The apparatus • The signal acceptance and S/B • Time schedule and Conclusions M. Lenti
Kaon Physics CP M. Lenti
K→pnn Use Isospin Symmetry and normalize to K→pen M. Lenti
Theoretical uncertainties: KL→p0nn Matrix Element from Kl3 Only Top contributes M. Lenti
Theoretical Uncertainties: K+→p+nn Charm and Top contribute CKM M. Lenti
Physics motivations • Theoretically very clean • Sensitive to Vtd • Very sensitive to New Physics • Present (E787/949):BR(K+p+nn) = 1.73 ×10-10 • with 7 events +1.15 -1.05 Need a 10% measurement (100 events): NA62 M. Lenti
How many K+ decays? ] ~1013 K+ decays • BR(K+→p+nn) ~ 8×10-11 • Look for ~100 signal events • Signal acceptance ~ 10% NA48/NA62 Use the existing CERN accelerators Use the existing NA48 experimental hall M. Lenti
The Beam • Primary Beam: • 400 GeV/c protons • 3×1012 protons/pulse (3×NA48/2) • 4.8/16.8 s duty cycle • Secondary Beam: • 75 GeV/c momentum (Dp/p~1%) • Beam acc.: 12.7 mstr(32×NA48/2) • Total rate: 800 MHz • K+ ~ 6% • 4.5×1012 K+decays/y (45×NA48/2) M. Lenti
The Beam purity • Only 6% K+ but: • protons and positrons don’t decay... • pions and muons decays cannot mimic K+ decays • but beam-gas interactions !! Keep vacuum at 10-6 mbar: use existing NA48 decay tank (already directly measured) Tag the K+ in the beam: use a CEDAR M. Lenti
The CEDAR The CEDAR is a Cherenkov counter Used at CERN since long time Vary gas pressure and diaphragm aperture to select K+ November 2006: test beam with a CEDAR 100 GeV/c beam Filled with Nitrogen Adapt to NA62 needs: Fill with Hydrogen Change PMT and FE Pions Protons Kaons M. Lenti
Background: K+ decays M. Lenti
Kinematics p qKp K+ n n m2miss=(PK-Pp)2 92% K+ decays 8% K+ decays PK : beam spectrometer Pp: straw chambers spectrometer M. Lenti
Beam Spectrometer (I) • 3 Silicon Pixels stations across the 2nd Achromat: • 60(X) × 27(Y) mm per station (18000 pixel/station) • Beam rate: 800 MHz (“Gigatracker”), 50 MHz/cm2 M. Lenti
Beam Spectrometer (II) s(PK)/PK ~ 0.2% s(qK) ~ 14 mrad • 300×300 mm pixels p-in-n • (18000 pixel per station) • 200 mm Si sensor + 100 mm chip • 0.13 mm CMOS technology <0.5% X0 /station s(t) ~ 200 ps/station Mech. support Si sensor Pixel matrix M. Lenti R-O chip
Beam Spectrometer (III) Readout VESSEL’S SIDE CLAMPED DETECTOR’S EDGE CLAMPED The cooling System DETECTOR’S EDGE SLIDING M. Lenti VESSEL’S SIDE SLIDING
Straw Chambers • 4 chambers with 4 layers/view • Ø 9.6 mm straw tubes in vacuum • 2.1 m long straws • 0.1% X0 per view (4 views) • 130 mm hit resolution per view • NA48 magnet (256 MeV/c pt kick) • holes follow beam path M. Lenti
Straws Prototype In vacuum 2007 prototype M. Lenti
Kinematics Reco. Missing mass measurement: dominated by angle between Kaon and pion M. Lenti
Background 1: K+→m+n • Km2 :largest BR: 63.4% • Need ~10-12 rejection factor • Kinematics: 10-5 • Muon Veto: 10-5 • Particle ID: 10-2 MUV RICH M. Lenti
Muon Veto: MUV • Re-use of Front Module of • NA48 Hadron Calorimeter • Build a new module • Build a Fast Plane for trigger • 10-5m detection inefficiency New module: sandwich of iron plates and scintillator strips M. Lenti
RICH • p-m 3s separation 15-35 GeV/c • Neon at 1 atm (p thr.: 12 GeV/c) • 2000 PMT • 18 mm pixel • 100 ps Mirrors 18 m Beam Pipe PMT: Hamamatsu R7400 U03 M. Lenti
15 GeV/c e RICH prototype: 2009 test beam m p p×mp/mm Ring Radius (mm) 35 GeV/c p e p×mp/mm Muon suppression (15.35 GeV/c): 0.7% (preliminary) Ring Radius (mm) M. Lenti
Background 2: K+→p+p0 (Kp2) 2nd Largest BR:20.9% • Need ~10-12rejection factor • Kinematics: 5×10-3 • Photon Veto: 10-5per photon (10-8per p0) • Large angle:12ANTIs (10 < acceptance < 50 mrad) • Medium angle:NA48 LKr (1 < acceptance < 10 mrad) • Small angle: IRC, SAC (acceptance < 1 mrad) M. Lenti
Large Angle Veto • 12 ring em calorimeters in vacuum • 5 staggered planes per ring • inefficiencies: • 10-4.05<Eg<1 GeV • 10-5Eg>1 GeV OPAL Lead Blocks reused M. Lenti
Large Angle Veto: 1° ring First ring built in Frascati and installed at CERN. Test beam in mid-october 2009 M. Lenti
Small Angle Veto • shaslyk calorimeter on the beam axis • 10-5ineff. High energy g Tested in October 2006 In the NA48 tagged photon beam (see later) M. Lenti
Liquid Kripton Calorimeter • Use the existing NA48 LKr calorimeter • 10-5 ineff. Eg>5 GeV • 10-4 ineff. 1<Eg<5 GeV Ineff. for Eg>10 GeV tested on data collected by NA48/2 (K+→p+p0) p g g M. Lenti
Liquid Kripton Calorimeter (II) Kevlar window Magnet Calorimeter October 2006 test: Tagged photon beam Using the existing NA48 setup vacuum e- g Electron beam (25 GeV/c) Bremsstrahlung Drift chambers Energy deposition in LKr electron • 2×108 electrons collected • 10-5 ineff.sensitivity below 10 GeV g Energy GeV M. Lenti X LKr cm
Multibody Background Ex. K+→p+p-e+n Stagger Straws to be hermetic for p- up to 60 GeV/c M. Lenti
The NA62 Layout 10 MHz 800 MHz 50 MHz M. Lenti
NA62 Event Display M. Lenti
Signal Acceptance Region I: 0<mmiss2<0.01 GeV2/c4 Region II: 0.026<mmiss2<0.068 GeV2/c4 Remind: Km2mmiss2 < 0 Kp2mmiss2 = 0.0182 GeV2/c4 15 <pp< 35 GeV/c Fiducial decay region: 60 m Acceptance: 3.5% (Region I), 10.9% (Region II): 14.4% (I+II) M. Lenti
Signal/Background M. Lenti
Trigger Levels • 10 MHzL0 trigger input • 1track × m! × g! → 1 MHzL1 trigger input → PC farm • Software trigger reduction ~ 40 M. Lenti
Conclusions • 2006-2009: R&D, test beam • 2009-2011: Construction • 2012: start data-taking • NA62 approved by CERN Research Board: 5.12.2008 • NA62 approved by INFN: 24.7.2009 • Clear Physics case • many other physics channels The NA62 Collaboration: ITP Bern, Birmingham, Bristol, CERN, Dubna, INFN (Ferrara, Firenze, Frascati, Napoli, Perugia, Pisa, Rome I, Rome II, Torino), Fairfax, Glasgow, IHEP, INR, Liverpool, Louvain, Mainz, Merced, San Louis Potosi, SLAC, Sofia, TRIUMF M. Lenti
SPARES M. Lenti
RK: theory Few % effect possible M. Lenti
RK: NA62(2007-2008) 40% of data analyzed, 51000 Ke2 candidates, 8% background M. Lenti
RK: prelim.results M. Lenti