340 likes | 443 Views
Competitiveness in SEE and Prospects in the Catching-Up Process: A Regional Overview. Peter Mooslechner Director Economic Analysis and Research Department Oesterreichische Nationalbank National Bank of the Republic of Macedonia Skopje – May 30, 2008. Overview The Starting Point:
E N D
Competitiveness in SEEand Prospects in the Catching-Up Process: A Regional Overview Peter MooslechnerDirectorEconomic Analysis and Research DepartmentOesterreichische Nationalbank National Bank of the Republic of MacedoniaSkopje – May 30, 2008
Overview • The Starting Point: • Initial income gap ….. but signs of catching-up • Underlying factors • Elements of price and cost competitiveness • The importance of the regulatory framework • Factors of SEE competitiveness within Europe: • Trade integration: Sectoral and geographical aspects • Current account balance: Structural issues • SEE: Attractiveness for foreign investors • Where does the region go to? • …plus some facts on Euroization in SEE
Income level still lower than in the EU-27, but income convergence under way…..
….. although it will take some time Source: Eurostat, OeNB.
Competitive Advantages of SEE Countries • Critical issue: „Hard factors“ point more towards a certain loss in price competitiveness • But „soft factors“ draw a more favourable picture: • Continuously improving infrastructure supports trade with the EU markets • Geographical location, closeness to the enlarged EU • EU accession process • Progress in regional cooperation and integration • Attractiveness for FDI
The Competitive Position of SEE within Europe: Elements of a Dynamic View
Technological Upgrading is Taking Place, but Structural Differences Remain
The Permanent Challenge of Trade and Current Account Balances
Where does the region go to? • SEE still with significant cost/price advantage compared to the European Union • EU is main trading partner - but low share in total EU imports points to considerable growth potential • Trade with the CEE-5 region as well as interregional trade is rising (and these regions show stronger growth than the rest of the EU) • Specialisation of production on low-tech and basic goods sector faces strong competition from Asian countries (in particular China) • Obvious need for technological upgrading to gain in long-term competitiveness
Why Euroization in SEE Countries? • Competitiveness is not only a question of wages, prices and productivity – it is also a question of the exchange rate • Under certain (specific) conditions: Expectations are stabilized by fixed exchange-rate policies • Historical experience: Austria’s “hard currency policy” – a particular example of pegging a country’s currency • Today: ERM II and Monetary Union • For most SEE countries the introduction of the Euro is still a long way to go • People and policy makers might chose different ways to go • Euroization is a peculiarity of this region
The Use of the Euro in Central, Eastern and Southeastern Europe – Survey Design (I) Survey conducted since 1997 Initially 5 Countries (Czech Republic, Hungary, Slovakia, Slovenia and Croatia) reduced to 4 Countries after Slovenia joining the Euro Area NEW Geographical scope from autumn 2007 on 6 EU Member States: Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Romania and Slovakia 5 Southeastern European Countries: Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (FYR Macedonia) and Serbia
The Use of the Euro in Central, Eastern and Southeastern Europe – Survey Design (II) • In each country about 1000 persons over the age of 14 are interviewed (in Poland only the population of the 10 largest cities); 2 waves per year (spring and autumn) • Overall 26 questions plus socio-demographics, including also nonregular questions on specific topics (for example on foreign currency loans) • Central questions: ■ amounts and composition of foreign currency cash holdings ■ foreign currency denominated deposits ■ as well as motives for holding them
Summary of First Survey Results • The euro plays a predominant role in foreign currency denominated assets held by residents throughout the region. • In general, euro cash holdings are more important in Southeastern European Countries than in EU Member States. • Key motives to hold euro cash: • Southeastern Europe, BU and RO as a store of value, • other EU Member States for holidays and shopping purposes abroad.
Where to find more information….. ■ Focus on European Economic Integration Main results will be provided in an article on a regularly basis (semi-annual); first one in FEEI 1/2008 (July) ■ Research and information platform on the internet (July 2008) Details on the Survey, sample, technical report, questionnaire Selected results and complete list of publications www.oenb.at, ceec.oenb.at ■ The International Role of the Euro Box prepared for the European Central Bank’s report ■ Occasional newsletter on special topics ■ Ongoing research activities ■ Stix, H. 2008. Euroization: What Factors Drive its Persistence? Household Data Evidence for Croatia, Slovenia and Slovakia. OeNB Working Paper No. 140. ■ Presentation of papers by Doris Ritzberger-Gruenwald and Helmut Stix at the Annual Meeting of the Austrian Economic Association 2008