160 likes | 290 Views
Introduction. Two types of data for catastrophe analysis Exposures treated as inputs Market Share Location Specific Losses are simulated from the models Experience is sparse Models are black boxes Common Problems. Exposures. Allows for management of exposures By geographic region
E N D
Introduction • Two types of data for catastrophe analysis • Exposures treated as inputs • Market Share • Location Specific • Losses are simulated from the models • Experience is sparse • Models are black boxes • Common Problems
Exposures • Allows for management of exposures • By geographic region • By LOB • By Peril
Market Share Models • Advantages • Limited amount of data needed • Premium • State • County • Sum of Insured by county • Limits • Value • Ease of use
Market Share Models • Disadvantages • Limited modeling of reinsurance • Excess • Per Risk • Facultative • Deductible not taken into account
Location Specific Catastrophe Runs • Advantages • Specific policy information • Reinsurance information • Disadvantages • Time consuming • More data required
Data Requirements for Location Specific Catastrophe Runs • Physical Characteristics of risk • Primary • Construction type • Occupancy • Secondary • Height • Age • Etc.
Data Requirements for Location Specific Catastrophe Runs • Financial Characteristics • Location Information • Value • Limit • Deductible • Site Information • Limit • Deductible
Data Requirements for Location Specific Catastrophe Runs • Policy Information • Blanket limit • Blanket deductible
Data Requirements for Location Specific Catastrophe Runs • Reinsurance Structure • Excess Information • Attachment points • Limits • Treaty Information • Inuring order • Terms
Data Requirements for Location Specific Catastrophe Runs • Definitions of a risk • One building, one location • Multiple buildings at one location
Loss Data • The output from a catastrophe model is simulated loss data. • Annual frequency • Annual severity • Simulating reinsurance structures by integrating a insurers property book with the catastrophe losses.
Uses of Losses • Losses by event, by peril • Exceeding probability curves • Expected losses by layer • Manageable file sizes • Losses by event, by region, by peril • Expected loss by region • Probability of losses exceeding a fix amount in a region • Larger files sizes
Uses of Losses • Losses by event, by region, by policy, by peril • Marginal PMLs • Output files can be large.
Common Problems • Only billing address available • No information on number or amount of liability of structures being insured • Only policy information not the underlying structure information. Damage curves based on value not limit.
Common Problems • No deductible information • There is an intrinsic tradeoff between how much specific detail to capture for the modeling and the gains from the extra information.
Common Problems • There is the problem with geocoding companies’ exposures. The is always differences between the Postal Code database used by the capturing company and the database used by the model.