140 likes | 258 Views
KeLa Energy LLC. KeLa Engineered Fuels. KeLa Energy Background. KeLa purpose Meet Customer needs Share potential of KeLa Technology Commercialize Energy Products KeLa core technology Solids binding process - coal & non-coal applications Water free/water resistant
E N D
KeLa Energy LLC KeLa Engineered Fuels
KeLa Energy Background • KeLa purpose • Meet Customer needs • Share potential of KeLa Technology • Commercialize Energy Products • KeLa core technology • Solids binding process - coal & non-coal applications • Water free/water resistant • Can blend biomass (wood, etc) into coal • Clean, safe, environmentally responsible
Goals: Emission Reduction? Renewable Energy? Lower Cost? • Why co-fire with Wood or Biomass? • Reduce SOx, NOx, CO2 • Include renewable energy in fuel mix • Delay or eliminate need for scrubbers • How much wood is desired? 10% or more? • Handling biomass on site is challenging • The lower BTU biomass can lower unit peak output
KeLa Technology Review • Patent Pending • Binding Methodology • General Benefits of Binder System • Benefits to You from KeLa Engineered Fuels
General Benefits • High renewable content (35% typical) • Higher BTU than coal/wood co-firing • Sulfur & moisture content reduced • Hydrogen content boosted • Improved ignition – lower unburned carbon • Handle & store like coal • May qualify for renewable energy credits
Benefits to Coal Consumers • Higher Emissions Reductions than Co-Fire • 35-40% SOx reduction • Higher BTU/Less fuel consumption – Lower Costs • Reduce or eliminate need for emissions credits • No loss of plant output with Biomass • No Capital Investment or Modifications • Keep older, smaller units in service • Cost of Steam & Generation more competitive
Benefits to KeLa Customers Lower Emissions • Properties • Cleaner • Greener • Cheaper VALUE Renewable Higher Btu
Fuel Analysis • Synthetic vs Coal • 11% higher BTU’s • 25% renewable-recycled • 28% lower Sulfur • 33% higher Hydrogen • Low Ash & NOx • 5% less moisture
Case Study #1 • Coal-1 Analysis • 12,227 BTU/Lb • 0.92% Sulfur • 10.32% Ash • 6.01% Moisture • KeLa Engineered Fuel-1 (083-SBB) • 13,351 BTU/Lb (9.2% increase) • 0.59 Sulfur (36% reduction) • 10.38% Ash (~same) • 2.98% Moisture (~half less)
Case Study #2 • Coal-2 Analysis • 11,113 BTU/Lb • 1.30% Sulfur • 19.26% Ash • 4.56% Moisture • KeLa Engineered Fuel-2 (017-NFM) • 11,827 BTU/Lb (6.4% increase) • 0.88 Sulfur (32% reduction) • 20.48% Ash (7.2% increase) • 0.81% Moisture (82% reduction)
Case Study #3 - SBB • Coal-3 Analysis • 11,113 BTU/Lb • 1.30% Sulfur • 19.26% Ash • 4.56% Moisture • KeLa Engineered Fuel-3 (014-NFM) • 12,322 BTU/Lb (10.9% increase) • 1.07 Sulfur (18% reduction) • 17.50% Ash (9.1% lower) • 1.41% Moisture (69% reduction)
KeLa Energy Status • Utility patent expected to be issued by end of 2007 • Stoker fuel tested on production equipment • Second stoker fuel test scheduled • Fuel analysis of stoker fuel available • Production Plant under development • Seeking additional Stoker customers
KeLa Contact Info • Larry Moot – VP Engineering • 407-399-1228 • larrympca@yahoo.com • Kent Flanery – President • 606-923-3162 • tkflanery@roadrunner.com