1 / 23

Making Data-Based Decisions Monthly Coaches’ Meeting Module CC

Making Data-Based Decisions Monthly Coaches’ Meeting Module CC . DC Name and Date Here. Evaluating Your Data . Data Evaluation: Process is in place for making informed decisions Process includes problem identification, problem analysis, intervention implementation and evaluation

carolos
Download Presentation

Making Data-Based Decisions Monthly Coaches’ Meeting Module CC

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Making Data-Based Decisions Monthly Coaches’ Meeting Module CC DC Name and Date Here

  2. Evaluating Your Data • Data Evaluation: • Process is in place for making informed decisions • Process includes problem identification, problem analysis, intervention implementation and evaluation • 4-step problem-solving process (RtI) • Informs your Action Plan steps • continue interventions/practices • adapt, revise, modify interventions/practices • discontinue interventions/practices

  3. Evaluating Your Data • Evaluation Process Includes: • System to efficiently and effectively collect, record and graph data • Resources and expertise to review and analyze data • Monthly review and analysis of discipline and outcome data • SWPBS Action Plan updates based on data review and analysis • Discussion: • Are these steps included in your school’s data evaluation process? • If not, in what areas would you like additional support?

  4. Discipline Data Sources • Five major data sources: • Average referrals/day/month • Referrals by: problem behavior, location, time of day, and individual student • Additional data sources • Referrals by motivation or function (get/obtain, escape/avoid) • Office-managed vs. classroom-managed referrals • ISS/OSS data • Discussion: • Does your PBS team review and analyze your school’s discipline data at each meeting? • Does your team use the data to evaluate the PBS development and implementation process and develop next steps?

  5. Other Data Sources • Staff, student and/or parent surveys • Staff and student attendance • Teacher requests for assistance or school-wide behavioral screening • ESE referrals • Grades and/or standardized test scores (FCAT) • Fidelity measures • Benchmarks of Quality, PBS Implementation Checklist, Walkthrough Evaluations • SWPBS Action Plan • Direct observations • Discussion: • What are other sources of outcome data? • Does your PBS team review other data sources at each meeting and use the data to evaluate progress?

  6. Data Evaluation • Questions to address at each monthly PBS meeting: • Are problem behaviors improving? • Are problem behaviors ‘holding steady’? • Are problem behaviors ‘getting worse’? • The following slides provide ‘next steps’ to help address each of these questions.

  7. Problem Behaviors Improving • Discipline data shows a decrease in problem behavior • At least 80% of students receive 0-1 ODRs • Significant decrease in ODRs from previous month/quarter • Decrease in OSS/ISS days • Review other data sources to confirm progress • At least 80% of students contact reward events • PBS Implementation Checklist/Benchmarks of Quality • Consistency exists across teachers, grade-levels/hallways, etc. • School-climate/faculty surveys more positive or supportive • ODRs are decreasing equally - disaggregate the data • ESE, ethnicity/race, free/reduced lunch, male/female • Classroom, grade-level, individual teachers

  8. Problem Behaviors ‘Holding Steady’ • Look for areas of improvement • Benchmarks of Quality, PIC, Action Plan implementation • Increasing the level of support at Tier 1 may increase intervention effectiveness • Are your interventions targeted appropriately? • Review referrals by location, time of day, teacher, grad-level, etc. • Review expectations and rules • Are the expectations well-defined and have they been taught? • Review discipline procedures and definitions • Are problem behaviors well-defined? • Are office-managed vs. teacher-managed behaviors well-defined? • Do your interventions target the appropriate function/motivation of the problem behaviors?

  9. Problem Behaviors ‘Getting Worse’Problem-Solving Process Step 1: Problem Identification What’s the problem? Step 4: Response to Intervention Step 2: Problem Analysis Why is it occurring? Is it working? Step 3: Intervention Design What are we going to do about it?

  10. Problem Behaviors ‘Getting Worse’ • Use the 4-step problem solving process: 1. Identify the Problem Be specific, problem behavior(s) should be well-defined 2. Analyze the Problem – Hypothesis development Teaching – Are the expectations being taught as planned? Fidelity – Are the interventions being implemented as designed? Admin decisions & function of behavior: Is problem behavior being reinforced? • 3. Design Interventions Do the interventions target the problem behavior(s)? Have the strategies been taught to all staff? • 4. Evaluation (RtI) – Is it working? Are the problem behaviors decreasing?

  11. 1. Problem Identification http://flpbs.fmhi.usf.edu/coachescorner.asp Intervention Planning and RtI

  12. Problem Identification - Example

  13. 2. Problem AnalysisAdapted: Advanced SWIS Facilitator Workshop, APBS Conference, March 2008 by Florida’s Positive Behavior Support Project, RtI for Behavior, University of South Florida, Tampa, Fl. http://flpbs.fmhi.usf.edu/coachescorner.asp Intervention Planning and RtI

  14. Problem Analysis - Example

  15. 2. Hypothesis Development • Variables to Consider: • School-Wide • Supervision, staff commitment and buy-in • Classroom • Organization, cleanliness, location • Curriculum • Expectations defined, adequate lesson plans, plan for teaching • Instruction • Frequency, fidelity to lesson plan, opportunities to practice • Family/Community • Commitment and support • Students • Characteristics shared by the majority of the students in the school

  16. 3. Intervention Design http://flpbs.fmhi.usf.edu/coachescorner.asp Intervention Planning and RtI

  17. 3. Intervention Design - Example

  18. Using Data to Guide Interventions • Match interventions to the function of behavior • http://flpbs/coachescorner.asp - ‘Intervention Planning & RtI’... ‘Intervention Ideas Based on Function of Behavior’ • Use your hypothesis statement to inform your interventions • Determine the smallest change your team can make that will have greatest impact. DO IT!

  19. 4. Response to Intervention http://flpbs.fmhi.usf.edu/coachescorner.asp Intervention Planning and RtI

  20. Response to Intervention - Example

  21. 4. Evaluation: Guiding Questions • Is PBS/RtI:B being implemented across campus? • Is it being implemented with fidelity? • Is there sustainability of implementation? • Are there benefits to students over time with PBS/RtI:B implementation? • Are there benefits for staff? • Do students with greater needs benefit from implementation?

  22. Use Your Data • Identify areas that are problematic • Improve Tier 1 supports • Expand and implement PBS/RtI:B strategies • Tier 2/Supplemental • Tier 3/Intensive • Support the acquisition of additional resources for further school improvement • Promote PBS/RtI:B within the community • Identify and celebrate successes

  23. Data Review • District Coordinators: Have the PBS Coaches bring their schools’ current discipline data to the meeting • Data Evaluation Questions: • Are problem behaviors improving at your school? • Are the problem behaviors holding steady? • Are the problem behaviors getting worse? • As a group: • Review, analyze and discuss the data • Note significant problem areas and areas of greatest improvement • Develop possible action plan steps to address the problem areas

More Related