210 likes | 281 Views
Lewis Structure. Localized Electron Bonding Model. A molecule is composed of atoms that are bound together by sharing electron pairs. A bonding pair is of which two electrons are localized between two adjacent nuclei. A lone pair is that the electron pair is
E N D
Lewis Structure Localized Electron Bonding Model • A molecule is composed of atoms that are • bound together by sharing electron pairs. • A bonding pair is of which two electrons • are localized between two adjacent nuclei. • A lone pair is that the electron pair is • localized in an atom.
Octet Rule • electron dot (bar) formula 2 valence eletrons & net charge 3 multiple bond 4 dative bond (arrow to the acceptor) • formal charge • What is the difference between f. c. & ox. no 6 generally good thru the 3rd period
What is the difference between f. c. & ox. no Formal charge is for the comparison of the elctron change between the bonded and the non-bonded atomic molds. Oxidation number is for the comparison of the electron change between the oxidized and the reduced molds. Formal charge and oxidation numbers are the same for the ionic compounds.
Disadvantage of Lewis Structure 1 Octet rule is no good ford orbital or d electrons involved species – use 18 electron rule 2 no good for electron delocalization – use resonance 3 Octet rule is no good for odd electron species 4 no information for geometry- use VSEPR 5 It does not explain the bonding character – use VBT or MOT
Valence Bond Theory (VBT) Atomic orbitals that involve in chemical bonding are the major concern. ψiψj ≠ 0, wherein ψi and ψjrepresent the orbital wave functions of different atoms.
VBT for H2 Consideration of simple orbital coulomb overlap: ΨI = ψ1sa(1)ψ1sb (2)―curve a
ΨI = ψ1sa(1) ψ1sb (2) experimental
Consideration of indistinguishability of the electrons: Heitler –London functions: Attractive ΨII+ = ψ1sa(1)ψ1sb (2) + ψ1sa(2)ψ1sb (1) ― curve b Repulsive ΨII− = ψ1sa(1)ψ1sb(2)− ψ1sa(2)ψ1sb (1) ― curve g
ΨII– = ψ1sa(1) ψ1sb(2) –ψ1sa(2) ψ1sb(1) ΨI = ψ1sa(1) ψ1sb (2) ΨII+ = ψ1sa(1) ψ1sb(2) + ψψ1sa(2) ψ1sb(1) experimental
Consideration of effective nulear charge: • Ψ1s = N(z/a0)3/2exp(-zr/a0), z = 1.17―curve c • The z-modification gives good bond length, • but energy is still substantially off.
ΨII– = ψ1sa(1) ψ1sb(2) –ψ1sa(2) ψ1sb(1) ΨI = ψ1sa(1) ψ1sb (2) ΨII+ = ψ1sa(1) ψ1sb(2) + ψ1sa(2) ψ1sb(1) experimental z = 1.17
Consideration of polarizability or hybridization: ψa = N (1sa + g 2pza) ψb = N (1sb + g 2pzb), assuming z is the nuclear axis.
Normalization condition gives N = 1/(1 + g2)1/2 Contribution of 1sa to ψa (or 1sb to ψb) is 1/(1 + g2) Contribution of 2pza to ψa (or 2pzb to ψb) is g2/(1 + g2) If g is set as 0.1, which gives 99% (1/1.01) of 1s and 1% (0.01/1.01) of 2pz. Note that 1% of contribution of pz accounts for about 5% energy stabilization, mainly due to the enhancement of orbital overlap efficiency.
ΨII– =ψ1sa(1) ψ1sb(2) –ψ1sa(2) ψ1sb(1) ΨI =ψ1sa(1) ψ1sb (2) ΨII+ = ψ1sa(1) ψ1sb(2) + ψ1sa(2) ψ1sb(1) z = 1.17 experimental ψa = N (1sa + g 2pza) ψb = N (1sb + g 2pzb) g = 0.1
Combine indistinguishability and hybridization: Attractive Heitler –London functions: ΨIII = ψa(1)ψb (2) + ψa(2)ψb (1) Consideration of other overlaps 1sa–2pb/2pa–1sb and 2pa–2pb
Consideration of ionization: • H―H↔Ha−―Hb+↔ Ha+―Hb− • ΨIV = ψa(1)ψb (2) + ψa(2)ψb (1) • + lψa(1)ψa (2) + lψb(1)ψb (2) • = 0.25 would minimize the total energy. The value of l2 ~ 0.06, indicating that about 6% ionic contribution will only improve the energy to 2~3%.
ΨII– = ψ1sa(1) ψ1sb(2) –ψ1sa(2) ψ1sb(1) ΨI = ψ1sa(1) ψ1sb (2) ΨII+ = ψ1sa(1) ψ1sb(2) + ψ1sa(2) ψ1sb(1) z = 1.17 ψa = N (1sa + g 2pza) ψb = N (1sb + g 2pzb) g = 0.1 experimental ΨIV = ψa(1) ψb(2) + ψa(2) ψb(1) + lψa(1) ψa(2) + lψb(1) ψb(2)
Valence Bond of HF Consideration of indistinguishable orbital overlap ΨI = 1s(H)(1)2pz(F)(2) + 1s(H)(2)2pz(F)(1)
Consideration of hybridization: Hybridization for A.O. of F would give the configuration of 2s12p6 which allows the use of 2s for bonding. ψF = N (2pz(F) + g 2s(F)), g < 0.5 and g2 < 0.25, the contribution of 2s (i.e. g2/(1+g2) in F is less than 20%. Consideration of ionic model: Ψ = ψ1s(H)(1)ψF (2) + ψ1s(H)(2)ψF (1)+ lψF(1)ψF(2) Pauling estimated that l2 ~ 50%.
Advantages from hybridization: • It helps to have the electron density concentrated • between the nuclei, thus leading to the enhancement • of localized bonding character. • It helps to decrease the electron-electron repulsion. • ψlp(F) = N (2s(F)−g 2pz(F))