1 / 16

SACS Reaffirmation of Accreditation 2015

SACS Reaffirmation of Accreditation 2015. Why is Accreditation so Important? Assures the public that institutions meet established standards Serves as a “gate-keeper” for federal financial aid Improves quality throughout the institution Without reaffirmation

carrington
Download Presentation

SACS Reaffirmation of Accreditation 2015

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. SACS Reaffirmation of Accreditation 2015

  2. Why is Accreditation so Important? • Assures the public that institutions meet established standards • Serves as a “gate-keeper” for federal financial aid • Improves quality throughout the institution • Without reaffirmation • Loss of reputation and respect • Loss of federal funding • Loss of opportunities for graduates

  3. The SACS Reaffirmation Process • Institution Prepares • Compliance Certification (On-line), and • Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP) • Review by the Commission on Colleges • Offsite Review of Compliance Certification • Report on findings (with potential Focused Report response) • On-Site Review; 1) QEP, 2) non-compliance issues, and 3) selected issues for US DOE • Report to Institution • Final Steps • Institutional response to Commission • Reaffirmation of Accreditation at SACS Annual Meeting (December 2015)

  4. External Timeline • Online Compliance Certification Submitted – September 2014 • Review by Off-site Team – November 2014 • QEP due to SACS – Six weeks prior to On-site Review • On-site Team Visits Campus – January - April 2015 • Report from On-Site Committee – June 2015 • Institutional Response to Report due – October/November 2015 • Reaffirmation of Accreditation – December 2015

  5. Major Elements of Accreditation • Enunciated in 86 “Principles for Reaffirmation” • Examples of Core Standards • Institution and Governance (including role of Board, administrative officers, General Education) • Institutional Effectiveness (outcomes assessment, QEP) • Programs (length, approval, admissions, academic support, curriculum) • Faculty (Credentials, evaluation, development, academic freedom, governance) • Resources (Library, staff, student affairs, financial) • SACS Policy (Substantive change, representation of status) • Examples of Federal Requirements • Student Achievement • Student Complaints • Recruitment Materials • Publication of Policies • Title IV • Student Authentication • Definition of Credit Hour • State Authorization for Distance Education

  6. Core Requirements (CR) – sample below; see handout

  7. Required Credentials (Faculty – FT and PT) • Vita (current within 5 years on Digital Measures) • Official Transcript(s) (terminal and/or discipline of instruction, or documented and attested equivalent) • Letters of Appointment (or equivalent) • Annual Continuance Letters (T-E) • Tenure & Promotion Letters (T-E) • Graduate Faculty Appointments, if applicable • Annual Faculty Evaluations

  8. Required Credentials (Graduate Teaching Associate [GTA] file) Should include the following: • Vita (current within 5 years on Digital Measures; upload capability to be developed) • Official Transcript(s) • Documented 18 hours of graduate credit in the discipline (or related discipline) AND completion of the Basic Skills in College Teaching (BSCT) Program or equivalent • Appointment form signed by employing Department Head, College Dean and Graduate Dean

  9. Faculty Roster Information Required (Full and Part-time): D, UN, UT, G: Developmental, Undergraduate Nontransferable, Undergraduate Transferable, Graduate Form & Instructions: http://sacscoc.org/cctemplates.asp

  10. Instructions for Faculty Roster Tenure Home

  11. Faculty Roster Instructions Continued: WKU Form & Instructions: http://sacscoc.org/cctemplates.asp

  12. Internal Process and Timeline (1) • Leadership Team Formed – March 2012 • Identify teams to address each of the SACS Principles – April 2012 • Create Website for uploading of information – April 2012 • Solicit QEP concept papers – April 2012 • Identify QEP topic – Fall 2012

  13. Internal Process and Timeline (2) • Produce Draft Compliance Certification – May 2013 • Online draft reviewed internally– Summer 2013 • Make improvements suggested by internal review team – by March 2014 • Mock Onsite Visit – April 2014 • Make Necessary Improvements – August 2014 • Submit Final Report – September 2014

  14. Department Head Involvement • Must demonstrate sufficient full-time faculty by academic program • At least 25% of major hours taught by terminally-credentialed faculty • Appropriate credentials for Program Coordinators • Credentials for all faculty and GTAs

  15. What does this Mean in the Coming Year? • Requests for verification of faculty credentials • On-going unit action planning and program-level • assessment of learning outcomes • Syllabi for all courses should: • include learning outcomes • follow WKU policy (posting on TopNet, etc.)

  16. July 26, 2012 – Dr. Belle Wheelan, President of SACS

More Related