180 likes | 293 Views
Expert Meeting on Trade Facilitation as an Engine for Development 22 September 2005. Trade Facilitation Problems of Exporters: Evidence from a Primary Survey in India. Presentation by S.V.Divvaakar Ace Global Private Limited. About Ace Global.
E N D
Expert Meeting on Trade Facilitation as an Engine for Development 22 September 2005 Trade Facilitation Problems of Exporters:Evidence from a Primary Survey in India Presentation by S.V.Divvaakar Ace Global Private Limited
About Ace Global • A consulting firm providing international trade and investment development services, set up by trade practitioners • Works with governments, trade bodies, and private enterprises in competitiveness enhancement: at country, sector and enterprise levels • Region Focus: South Asia, South East Asia, China, and recently SADC.
Survey Objectives • To identify specific trade facilitation problems faced in key destinations, relating to: • Article V (transit trade facilitation) • Article VIII (testing procedures, fees etc) • Article X (dissemination of regulations, appeal mechanisms) • Preponderance: Border-in or Border-out ? • Enterprise scale-specific issues (SMEs) • Expectations from negotiations
Survey Coverage ~350 Sectors: 10 Business respondents: 325 of which: Exporters – 278 Trade Intermediaries – 47 Sector bodies – 22 International Port locations - 2 Initiated by: UNCTAD India/DFID
Exporter Profile • More than 90% of India’s export processors are SMEs • More than 40% of exporters are SMEs • Export consignments are small (LCL) in many sectors • Considerable dependence on intermediaries for trade documentation and logistics planning
Handling of Customs Clearances In India In Destinations
Key Issues in Trade Facilitation • Destination-specific Issues: • US: • Costs of security related measures CSI, ACD, C-TPAT, Bioterrorism Act (5-20,000 US$/year for forwarding agents) • Some factors beyond exporters’ control (Double window notices to US FDA) • Inadequate info about detention on security grounds (reverse follow up) • Importers benefit from security cooperation but bill exporters for their additional costs (screening charges)
Key Issues in Trade Facilitation • Destination-specific Issues: • EU: • Excessive requirements, increasing amount of legislation • Lack of harmonization of procedures among member states • Unclear/discretionary procedures for detention and disposal • Import alert notifications and de-notifications follow different procedures • Absence of common EU level consultative/appeal mechanism
Key Issues in Trade Facilitation • West Africa, Middle East: • Excessive consular charges • Non-transparency in application of measures • Actions without sufficient notice, including retrospective effect • Collusion and partiality • Business practices at destinations affect exporters • South America: • Excessive documentation including freight breakup • High intermediary costs in Banking/financial systems • Heavy penalties for minor errors in documentation • Japan/Far East: • Unclear English translations of technical prescriptions • Language barriers impede interventions/corrective action
Costs of Compliance • Freight forwarders incur $ 5-20,000 per year for online filing systems • Clothing wholesalers levy screening charges of $ 0.5 per piece after arrival • ISPS charges $ 6-24 per container • Consular fees 6-7% of FOB value for cargoes to Mid East • Certification fees 3-4% of FOB value
Impacts on small enterprises • Contrary to expectations, costs/risks are lower for smaller enterprises. • Small players are often not direct exporters • Shipment on C&F or FOB terms, so destination delays are not to shipper account • Financial terms: L/C, so minimal deductions • No recurrence of problems, as business links are often not long-term • Larger operators, being part of global chains, face more compliance related costs.
Expectations • Information dissemination standards • Sector level trade enquiry points should be created • Uniform application of procedures by members of customs union • Imposition of trade alerts and de notifications should follow similar procedures and time line • Procedures should be established for confirmatory tests and single appeal mechanisms • Normative charges should be specified for private service providers