1 / 14

Geographic Information Systems Applications in Natural Resource Management

Geographic Information Systems Applications in Natural Resource Management. Chapter 16 Institutional Challenges and Opportunities Related to GIS. Michael G. Wing & Pete Bettinger. Chapter 16 Objectives.

carsten
Download Presentation

Geographic Information Systems Applications in Natural Resource Management

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Geographic Information SystemsApplications in Natural Resource Management Chapter 16 Institutional Challenges and Opportunities Related to GIS Michael G. Wing & Pete Bettinger

  2. Chapter 16 Objectives • The potential challenges ahead for successful and efficient GIS applications within and among natural resource management organizations; • The challenges that exist for organizations thinking of distributing GIS capabilities to field offices, a move becoming more prevalent as recent natural resource graduates likely will have GIS experience in coursework, and exposure or training in the field; and • How to assess the benefit of using GIS, a measurement process that will likely be necessary to develop more efficient business operations, higher quality products, and more timely management decisions.

  3. Sharing GIS databases with other natural resource organizations • Some federal agencies make significant amounts of natural resource GIS data available to the public • USDA Forest Service, USDI BLM, USGS • State agencies also make data available, but within a narrower scope than federal agencies • Oregon Department of Forestry • State GIS data clearing houses, however, may make significant amounts of data available • In contrast, private organizations typically take a much different perspective of their data • Data are seen as proprietary even though the source data may have been drawn from public sources • Energies and strategies are turned to how best to recoup costs associated with maintaining data • Concerns may also arise as to whether competitors may gain insights into management practices should they get the data

  4. Private organizations • Usually do not make data available to others unless they can find value in the exchange • There are exceptions: • The Washington State Department of Natural Resources (WADNR) has developed a process whereby both public and private organizations can contribute data to improve statewide databases • Also in Washington State, a number of watershed analyses conducted in the late 1990s saw data sharing between private and public organizations to develop watershed-wide databases

  5. Sharing of GIS databases within a natural resource organization • Issues of GIS database ownership, maintenance, distribution, and data quality within an organization can be problematic • This is usually a reflection of database design • A road engineer may be the best person to create and maintain a culvert database whereas a wildlife biologist may be the most appropriate to handle endangered species data • The abilities of an “expert” may not be suitable for GIS-related tasks or that person may not have time available for GIS tasks • A GIS technician, manager, or contractor may be a better solution in these cases • Other activities, such as maintenance and analysis, may also lead to GIS databases being shared within an organization

  6. Data sharing processes • Becoming more important as field personnel and management are becoming interested in GIS technology • Data sharing can be as simple as routing a computer disk from person to person, or office to office • In more advanced examples, data sharing may involve placing all organizational databases on a FTP server or Intranet site that is restricted to organizational members, or certain organizational members

  7. Distributing GIS capabilities to field offices can also be challenging • People • Provide training, statement of purpose, and motivation for GIS use • Databases • Clarify GIS database ownership, maintenance, acquisition, and distribution issues • Technology • Ensure that appropriate hardware and software are available, and are being managed properly • Leadership • Must demonstrate strong support for GIS, commit to long-term budgetary support, provide reward system for added responsibilities incurred by implementing GIS, and document the direction and strategic goals of the system

  8. Technical and institutional challenges • One of the most expensive and time-consuming aspects of using GIS is the effort required to create GIS databases • Therefore, duplication of previous data collection efforts should be avoided • Your best defense against duplication is awareness of what databases are available • Within an organization, databases should be cataloged in a database that is accessible to others • Metadata documents should also be available to describe the “fitness of use” of a database • Unfortunately, metadata are often absent, especially where private organizations are concerned • Be weary when using a database that is without metadata

  9. Organizations that make data available • Should make guidelines that address all aspects of database distribution • Technologies used to transmit data • Pricing structure should also be determined • Liability risk will likely increase without guidelines • A liability policy should probably be tailored for each database

  10. Before requesting data from an organization that doesn’t ordinarily provide data • Recognize that there are factors that hinder an organization’s willingness to share a database • This is the first step to successfully negotiate getting the data • Reluctance to share data may arise • Sensitive information such as endangered species or archeological sites • Ownership holdings or management practices • Scientific interest • Remedies • Payment for data • Confidentiality agreements

  11. Benefits of implementing GIS • The decision to implement a GIS- hardware, software, and people- can be very intimidating • While the costs can usually be estimated, the benefits are more difficult to quantify • Creation and storage of maps • Facilitating the measurement and analysis of landscape features • Allows landscape features stored in a GIS format to be integrated with other GIS databases • Landscape analysis products can convey information more expediently than through other means • GIS program managers must find a way to demonstrate the value of GIS benefits

  12. Successful GIS implementation • The costs of implementing and managing a GIS will vary from one organization to the next • Perhaps the strongest factor contributing to success is an organizational commitment from within the upper levels of management • This commitment needs to view implementing GIS as a long-term process • There are likely to be failures and unexpected challenges, particularly during the initial stages of implementation • GIS users should communicate their support for GIS to management • When technical difficulties arise, communication may also help managers understand that sometimes changes are needed to implementation processes

  13. Being realistic about GIS • GIS projects and analysis will typically require more time, effort, and other resources than initially estimated • Can be tough on expectations for rapid success • User training must continue • Workshops, continuing education

  14. Being realistic about GIS • Project objectives, rather than other measures, should be emphasized and can keep personnel focused when setbacks occur • Objectives can provide standards to judge project success • Achievement benchmarks can also bolster support when the going is tough • Involving GIS users, in addition to management, in the planning process may also increate effectiveness • Users are probably the best qualified to assess whether tasks can be completed

More Related