RF Monitoring: 2012-2013

1. RF Monitoring:2012-2013

2. RF Monitoring • RF Monitoring will still have its own guidance document for 2012-2013 • http://www.tea.state.tx.us/index2.aspx?id=2147495560&menu_id=2147483703&menu_id2=2147483719

3. Staging Criteria for RF Monitoring • Ranking from RF Tracker Data (last year’s data) • LRE Calculation • Commensurate School Day • Related Services • Time since last RF Monitoring On-Site Review • New Residential Facilities Present in the LEA • 2011-2012 PBMAS SPED Stage • History of Noncompliance in special education • Current Escalated Oversight • RF Tracker Data Quality

4. Staging “Levels” • Based on points assigned in matrix of staging criteria (“selection rubric” • Not Staged • Stage 1 • Stage 2 • Stage 3 • Stage 4 • Stage 4A • Stage 4B

5. Submission Window • Submission Window • (begins when staging is released in ISAM (likely in September) and ends on December 7, 2012* • Stage 1 – will complete all documents by December 7, 2012 and retain locally • Subject to submission request by TEA

6. PBMAS: An Evolution

7. Staging for PBMAS • 4 program areas • BE/ESL • CTE • NCLB • SPED

8. Staging for PBMAS (cont) • Each program area has indicators • Each indicator is assigned a performance level (“PL”) of 0, 1, 2, or 3 • PL increases from 0-3 based on variance from state “standard” or “target” • i.e., 0 = within state “standard” or “target”; PL increases as variance increases from state “standard” or “target”

9. Staging for PBMAS (cont) • Based on the numbers of PLs 2 or 3 per program area, staging is assigned • Staging is separate for each program area • Not staged • Stage 1 • Stage 2 • Stage 3 • Stage 4

10. PBMAS Manual • 2012 Manual Organization • Section I: Introduction • Section II: Components of the 2012 PBMAS • Section III: BE/ESL Indicators • Section IV: CTE Indicators • Section V: NCLB Indicators • Section VI: SPED Indicators • Section VII: Appendices

11. Section VI: SPED Indicators • Pages 82 – 119 • 18 indicators

12. Name & Description of Indicator

13. Indicator Calculation

14. Minimum Size Requirements & Special Analysis

15. Data Source for Indicator

16. Additional Notes

17. Performance Level Assignments/ Determinations

18. Information regarding special analysis, etc.

19. Standards (if applicable to the indicator)

20. Major Changes for 2012-2013 • One Guidance Document (regardless of single program or integrated interventions) • http://www.tea.state.tx.us/index2.aspx?id=2147504027&menu_id=2147483703&menu_id2=2147483708 • District AYP staging • District AU status • BE/ESL • CTE • NCLB/ESEA • SPED*

21. Texas Accountability Intervention System

22. Changes for 2012-2013 • One CIP, One CAP for PBMAS, AU, AYP • RF still separate for 2012-2013 • Improvement Plan Workbook (district) • data analysis • needs assessment • improvement plan • corrective action plan (CAP), if noncompliance is identified

23. Submission Window • Submission Window • (begins when staging is released in ISAM (likely in September) and ends on December 7, 2012* • Submission window is same for all staged LEAs, regardless of staging “levels” or programs • Note: Earlier (October 15) “submission window” for districts who are staged for AYP/AU only

24. Staging and Submission • If staged in two or more PBMAS program areas with no stage of intervention higher than a Stage 1, conduct all activities, complete CIP, and retain locally

25. Texas Accountability Intervention System

26. ISAM Updates

27. Hot off the Press…

28. Hot off the Press… • Noncompliance Module

29. Hot off the Press… • Noncompliance Module

30. Hot off the Press… • Noncompliance Module

31. Hot off the Press… • Noncompliance Module

32. 2012-2013 SPED Monitoring TETNs September 13, 2012 November 8, 2012 January 29, 2013 March 21, 2013 May 14. 2013 All sessions will be from 1:00-3:00