1 / 27

Astronomers in the Dark

Astronomers in the Dark. What you need to know about Galactic Structure before “discovering” Dark Matter. Neill Reid Kailash Sahu & Suzanne Hawley. Outline. Dark matter in the Galaxy – background and definitions Why cool white dwarfs?

carter-mays
Download Presentation

Astronomers in the Dark

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Astronomers in the Dark What you need to know about Galactic Structure before “discovering” Dark Matter Neill Reid Kailash Sahu & Suzanne Hawley

  2. Outline • Dark matter in the Galaxy – background and definitions • Why cool white dwarfs? • Stellar kinematics in the Galactic Disk • Heavy halo white dwarfs? Or just boring disk dwarfs?

  3. Galactic dark matter • Galaxy rotation curves at large radii are not Keplerian - heavy halos (Ostriker, Peebles & Yahil, 1974) - Milky Way M ~ 5 x 10^11 solar masses, R < 50 kpc visible material (disk + stellar halo) ~ 5 x 10^10 solar masses => 90% dark matter – particles? compact objects? • Microlensing surveys – MACHO, EROS, DUO,OGLE Given timescale, estimated velocity => mass MACHO: 13-17 events, t ~ 34-230 days, <V> ~ 200 km/s => can account for ~20% of the missing 90% <M> = 0.5+/- 0.3 solar masses

  4. Some definitions • The Galactic Disk - flattened, rotating population (220 km/sec): Pop I - metal-rich, -0.6 < [Fe/H] < 0.15 - total mass ~ 5 x 10^10 M(sun) - complex density structure (old disk, thick disk) - local mass density ~ 4.5 x 10^-3 M(sun)/pc^3 number density ~ 0.1 stars/cubic pc • The halo – near-spherical, non-rotating, pressure-supported: Pop II - metal-poor, -4 < [Fe/H] < -0.7 - total mass ~ 3 x 10^9 M(sun) - local number density ~ 0.0002 stars/cubic pc (0.2% disk) • The dark/heavy halo – near-spherical (?), non-rotating(?): Pop III - local mass density ~ 0.01 M(sun)/cubic pc

  5. Why white dwarfs • MACHOs: <M> ~ 0.5 +/- 0.3 M(sun) 50%  20% of the dark halo • HDF proper motion objects – Ibata et al (1999) 2-5 faint, blue sources with apparent motions  100% of dark halo • Cool white dwarfs (<3000K) are not black bodies  molecular hydrogen opacity originally highlighted by Mould & Liebert (1978) detailed models by Bergeron (1997) and Hansen (1999) a few examples have been detected in the field

  6. White dwarf complications • Cosmic pollution from Population III: white dwarfs are remnants – the ejected envelope carries nucleosynthesis products to the field How do you preserve a metal-poor Pop II halo? • Fiddle the mass function - avoid high-mass stars (M > 8 M(sun): no SN - avoid low-mass stars (M < 1 M(sun)): no long-lived dwarfs - avoid 4-8 M(sun) stars: no carbon stars • Require a radically different mode of star formation for Pop III - but we have no evidence of significant variations Pop II Pop I -3 < [M/H] < 0.2

  7. Finding heavy halo WDs: I • We are in the dark halo – local density ~ 10^-2 M_sun/pc^3 ~4 x 10^-3 MACHOs /pc^3 for 20% in 0.5 M(sun) objects if the dark halo is a non-rotating, pressure-supported structure, then we expect high velocities relative to the Sun => search for local representatives in proper motion surveys • Predicted S ~ 1 / tens of sq. degrees => Luyten’s Palomar surveys (POSSI  Luyten E (1963) LHS : m > 0.5 arcsec/yr, m_r<19.5, d > -36 NLTT : m > 0.18 arcsec/yr, m_rr < 19.5, d > -36 => LHS 3250 (Harris et al, 1999) …but dark halo white dwarfs are low luminosity, M( R) > 17 • Could these dwarfs have been missed in previous surveys?

  8. Finding heavy halo WDs: II • New surveys with deeper plate material IIIaJ – B ~ 21.5 – 22 POSS II & UK Schmidt IIIaF - R ~ 21 – 21.5 cf Luyten m_r ~ 20 IVN - I ~ 18 – 19 • First results: two good halo dwarf candidates WD0346+246 (Hodgkin et al (2000)) T ~ 3500K, velocity ~ 170 km/sec, M_V ~ 17, H/He composition F351-50 (Ibata et al, 2000) T ~3500K, high velocity, H/He composition Oppenheimer et al (2001): IR spectra, comparison with models • But the original blue white dwarf isn’t …. LHS 3250 – low velocity, over-luminous, binary?

  9. Finding heavy halo WDs? III • Oppenheimer et al. (Science Express, March 23) Photographic survey of ~10% of the sky near the SGP UK Schmidt plates: Dt ~ 5 to 20 years (IIIaJ, IIIaF, IVN) 0.33 < m < 10 arcsec/yr; R < 19.8, BRI photometry • 105 faint, high motion objects Spectroscopic follow-up: 55 confirmed as white dwarfs (DA, DC) • Distances from photometric parallaxes (B-R)  M_R (+/- 20%) • Sample is from South Galactic Cap, so m  (U, V) Exclude stars within “disk” 2-s velocity ellipsoid [NB <2s includes 86% of a sample for 2 uncorrelated variables]

  10. Finding heavy halo WDs? IV • 38 cool, high-velocity white dwarfs – all DC Compute densities using r = S 1/V_max, R < 19.7 mag. where d_max is set by d_m, the distance where m < 0.33 arcsec/yr, or d_m, the distance where R = 19.7 => local density of 2 x 10^-4 stars/pc^3 or ~10 times the density of halo white dwarfs  could account for 2% of dark matter if they’re heavy halo • But is the velocity distribution sensible? 34 prograde, 4 retrograde Selection effect? <r>=73 pc, m_lim ~ 3 “/yr  V_tan < 1040 km/sec • What about the disk?…

  11. Galactic Disk kinematics: I • Velocity dispersions increase as a function of age  s ~ t^b , b = ½  1/3 (orbit diffusion, Wielen ) • Disk sub-populations – young disk (<10^8 yrs) - old disk - thick disk => discrete kinematic structure

  12. Galactic Disk kinematics: II • Empirical measurements rest on volume-complete samples  require distances, proper motions, radial velocities, preferably some abundance information • M dwarfs are ideal - 80% of disk stars are M dwarfs => lots of nearby test particles - high m, complex spectra => space motions - crude abundances from CaH/TiO bands • PMSU survey of nearby stars (Reid, Hawley & Gizis, 1995) - 2000 M dwarfs potentially within 25 pc - volume-limited sample of 514 systems, 8 < M_V < 15, d > -30 95% complete – probably missing low-velocity stars

  13. Characterising Disk kinematics: I • Stellar kinematics are usually represented as Schwarzschild velocity ellipsoids: (s(U), s(V), s(W)) centred at (<U>,<V>,<W>) • How do we measure s  probability plots (Lutz & Upgren) consider a parameter, x, with measurements, x(i) produce a rank-ordered list, x(i) determine <x> and std. deviation, s plot x(i) vs [ (x(i) - <x>) / s ] A Gaussian distribution produces a straight line, slope s • A combination of 2 Gaussians gives 3 line segments, • slope s(1), s(2)

  14. Disk kinematics: II

  15. Disk kinematics: III • Results from fitting the M dwarf distribution <U> <V> <W> s(U) s(V) s(W) 1 -10 -23 -7 35 21 20 2 52 36 32 3? 65 where ~90% of local stars are in sub-population 1 • Oppenheimer et al adopt 0 -35 0 46 50 35 from Chiba & Beers (2000) analysis of intermediate abundance ([Fe/H]~-0.6) dwarfs => overestimate disk kinematics

  16. High-velocity disk dwarfs I • The Galactic disk has a complex kinematic structure - poorly represented by single Schwarzschild ellipsoid • How many high-velocity disk stars?  compare the M dwarf velocity distribution against Oppenheimer et al.’s halo selection criterion • 20 of 514 systems exceed (U+V) velocity limit - allowing for incompleteness in PMSU1, ~3.7% (note location)

  17. High-velocity disk dwarfs: II • Disk stars can have high velocities – M dwarfs: 0.2 < M(sun) > 0.6 3.7% would be classed as dark halo by Oppenheimer et al. >1 M(sun) disk stars have experienced the same dynamical evolution • High-velocity disk dwarfs are likely to be the oldest disk dwarfs => associated with cool white dwarfs • Local density: 12 white dwarfs within 8 parsecs, 7 single stars + 10 main-sequence dwarfs with M > 1 M(sun) => ~ 8 x 10^-3 stars / pc^3 3.7%  ~3 x 10^-4 white dwarfs / pc^3 • Oppenheimer et al. calculate r ~ 2 x 10^-4 stars/pc^3 • High-velocity disk white dwarfs can account for the observed r

  18. Halo white dwarfs? I • What about the highest velocity white dwarfs? • In a non-rotating system, N_prograde = N_retrograde  compute S 1/V_max for 4 dwarfs with retrograde motion F351-50, LHS 147, WD0135-039, WD0300-044 r_tot = 2 x r_obs ~ 2 x 10^-5 stars / pc^3 => expected density of halo white dwarfs • An absence of surprises

  19. Halo white dwarfs? II • How about the temperature distribution? White dwarfs in a primordial, dark halo should have t ~ 14 Gyrs  T < 3000 K • Given M_R from (B-R), plot M_R vs (R-I)  compare with theoretical tracks Most have ages < 7 Gyrs  if they’re dark halo, they have long-lived MS progenitors which we don’t observe • Most of the Oppenheimer et al. white dwarfs are remnants of the first stars which formed in the thick disk • White dwarfs from the stellar halo account for the rest • There is no requirement for a dark matter contribution

  20. Questions • So why didn’t they…. • …calculate how many white dwarfs you get from 5% disk contamination • …calculate the (U, V) limits for the appropriate proper motion selection bias • …compare the observed temperature distribution with that expected for a 14-Gyr dark halo

  21. Summary Evidence for heavy halo white dwarfs • MACHOs • --- but maybe they’re in the LMC/SMC • HDF proper motions • --- but they’re no longer moving • 3. High-velocity, cool white dwarfs in the field • --- not fast enough or cool enough • Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence • Make no unnecessary hypotheses • There is no need to invoke dark matter to explain • the cool white dwarfs found by Oppenheimer et al

  22. Shameless plug…. Now available from Amazon.com and in all the best bookstores

  23. A binary system White dwarfs can have brown dwarf companions

  24. A kinematic conundrum (1) Stellar kinematics are correlated with age  scattering through encounters with molecular clouds leads to 1. Higher velocity dispersions 2. Lower net rotational velocity, V e.g. Velocity distributions of dM (inactive, older) and dMe (active, younger)

  25. A kinematic conundrum (2) Stellar kinematics are usually modelled as Gaussian distributions  (s(U), s(V), s(W) ) But disk kinematics are more complex:  use probability plots Composite in V 2 Gaussian components in (U, W) local number ratio high:low ~ 1:10 thick disk and old disk?

  26. A kinematic conundrum (3) Kinematics of ultracool dwarfs (M7  L0) Hires data for 35 dwarfs ~50% trig/50% photo parallaxes Proper motions for all  (U, V, W) velocities We expect the sample to be dominated by long-lived low-mass stars – although there is at least one BD

  27. A kinematic conundrum (4) Ultracool M dwarfs have kinematic properties matching M0-M5 dMe dwarfs  t ~ 2-3 Gyrs Does this make sense? M7  L0 ~2600  2100K Where are the old V LM stars?

More Related