210 likes | 360 Views
Union Park District Council Ayd Mill Road Task Force St. Paul Capital Improvement Budget Proposal 2013. Background. (Very) Brief History. 1965: Opened as I-35E to I94 connector, but NOT connected 1993: EIS process started 2002: Connection to I-35E opened
E N D
Union Park District Council Ayd Mill Road Task Force St. Paul Capital Improvement Budget Proposal 2013
(Very) Brief History • 1965: Opened as I-35E to I94 connector, but NOT connected • 1993: EIS process started • 2002: Connection to I-35E opened • 2005: EIS Completed, with Record of Decision issued for “4-lane Extended to St. Anthony.” • 2005-present: No action. • 2010: EIS expires. New action requires a Supplemental EIS.
Ayd Mill Road Today • Four lanes. • A speed limit of 45 mph. • A connection to I-35E on the south end. • A northern terminus on Selby between Pascal and Saratoga. • Several entrances/exits closed with temporary barricades.
Current North-End Connect Hamline to St. Anthony Selby to Snelling Congestion Congestion 7 stoplights thru residential area and Concordia U 4 stoplights through bustling retail area
Shortage of Parks No parks
EIS-Proposed Extension (2005) • Across I-94 on new bridge to St. Anthony Ave. • Just east of US Post Office • Through nonresidental area • Roughly 1/3-mile, in effect re-creating Albert Avenue between Selby and St. Anthony Aves. • Behind Concordia U athletic fields • Just west of Higher Ground Academy
Summary This study uses a community process to identify a preferred disposition of the north end of Ayd Mill Road, prior to the legally-required Supplemental Environmental Impact Study.
Why Change Ayd Mill Road? • Enhance livability in north end neighborhoods. • Improve car, bicycle and pedestrian connectivity. • Encourage pedestrian and bicycleactivity. • Increase multi-modality and sustainability. • Move some traffic (and associated congestion, accidents and pollution) out of residential areas.
Why Change… (Continued) • Support redevelopmentat Selby and Snelling. • Support redevelopmentnear Snelling and I-94. • Foster use of the light rail system. • Correct the long-noted absence of parksin area. • Aesthetically improve the area.
Why Just the North End? • Changes in 2002 made the north end particularly unlivable. • Some of the trickiest resolution problems are in the north end.
Why Now? • It’s overdue: Since 2002 traffic at the north end has become too congested, too dangerous to residents. • New development at Snelling and Selby. • Imminent opening of the Green Line LRT. • Likely new development near Snelling and I-94. • The reconstruction of the Hamline Avenue bridge.
Study Components • Directed byDPED with City Council and DPW. • Including a Community Process, preceding data collection. • Including Data Collection and Analysis conducted by DPW and reviewed and approved by outside consultant.
Community Process • Using “Context Sensitive Solutions” approach. • Facilitated by a nationally-recognized Consultant. • Credible, engaging all stakeholders, including representatives from the south end. • Investigating New Design Ideas as well as long-identified ones. • No preconceived outcome.
The Preferred Solution MUST: • Reduce accidents, noise, congestion and pollutionat the north end. • Reduce cut-through traffic on north end residential streets. • Restrict truck traffic on Ayd Mill and in neighborhoods. • Provide a bicycle and pedestrian trail along Ayd Mill. • Add green space for neighborhood use.
Add’l Issues to Study • Traffic calming on Ayd Mill Road and in neighborhoods. • Alternatives to removal of the Pascal Avenue bridge. • Noise and pollution remediation along Ayd Mill Road. • Aesthetic and safety improvementsin affected north end streets and intersections. • Increased transit options. • Bike and pedestrian connections to Light Rail.
Park Opportunity • 2008 UPDC proposal • Expanded Community Garden space to include Hamline Ramp and “Ashland Park.” • Conceptual plan includes: • Picnic space • Playgrounds • Open space for recreation • Walking paths • Edible plants and trees that attract wildlife.