1 / 17

BCB 322: Landscape Ecology

BCB 322: Landscape Ecology. Lecture 7: Emerging patterns II Ecotones. Ecotones. First described in 1905 by Clements as “tension zones” where principal species from adjacent communities meet their limits (Farina, 1998)

casey
Download Presentation

BCB 322: Landscape Ecology

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. BCB 322:Landscape Ecology Lecture 7: Emerging patterns II Ecotones

  2. Ecotones • First described in 1905 by Clements as “tension zones” where principal species from adjacent communities meet their limits (Farina, 1998) • Importance further stressed by Odum (1959) as transition zones between two communities. • Situated where there is a change in the nature of ecological transfers compared with patch interiors (Farina, 1998) • Basically, ecotones have species in common with both adjacent interior communities, as well as edge-specialist species • Tends to have higher diversity than surrounding areas, and consequently may be interpreted as a habitat in itself (frontier habitat) (Ricklefs, 1973)

  3. http://www.geography4kids.com/misc/photos/ecotone.jpg Importance • Provide landscape functions: seeds & animals move across them. & they act as indicators of climatic shift • High biological diversity, and can act as refugia for species under changing conditions (climate/human impacts) • High rate of primary & secondary production, & contribute to system integrity • Riparian, coastal & lacustrine ecotones transmit nutrients & water to aquatic ecosystems & back • Understudied, but provide a good arena for study of natural communities. • Importance realised, & preserved in modern conservation plans where possible

  4. Basic concepts • Areas where energy & material exchange are at a maximum in a heterogeneous landscape • In terrestrial systems, they correspond with changes in soil/vegetation, & in heterogeneous systems are situated at patch edges (structural) • May also be functional, & may separate areas of different maturity • Found at all scales, both temporal & spatial • Can be thought of as acting as “cell membranes” or barriers (Forman & Moore, 1992), ensuring active & passive transport between patches. • Previous ecological measures considered archetypal terrain (interiors), but understanding of landscape ecology shows importance of boundaries between regions

  5. Difficulty of study • Since they are temporary, and because they scale so broadly, they can be hard to study • Often structure & function not even related to physical patterns, particularly as a result of human activity • Obvious characteristics visible from the air are lost on closer examination • Because it is an edge, it is hard to define the boundaries of an ecotone: some can be fairly short, and others broad even whilst examining at the same spatial scale • Thus edges are generally considered to occur where contrast between patches is greatest (species specific) http://www.class.uidaho.edu/italy2004/ecology_files/ecotone.jpg

  6. Species specificity • (a) ants, (b) mammals, (c) lizards (d) birds in a grassland (2700m transect sampled at 30m intervals) • Peaks correspond to discontinuities in resources/ habitats (pairwise sampling) Turner et al. 1990

  7. Heirarchical structure • Spatial: • Biome (blending of patches of different shapes & sizes from adjacent biomes) • Environmental mosaic (within biome: the shape & size of internal patches) • Patch (transition between patches) • Population (for species with patchy distribution/ territory) • Individual (eg: tree with localised water conditions or allellopathy) • Temporal: • 104 years: climatic shift changes species distributions • 103 years: historical movement of human civilizations • 102 years: coastal/river dynamics • 10 years: flooding regimes • Seasonal: snowmelt & water availability

  8. http://thegreencuttingboard.blogspot.com/Arundo-donax.jpg Controlling factors • Controls may be external or internal • External include edaphic, microclimate, human disturbance • Intrinsic can be species-specific or more broad-based • Allelopathy: pines/eucalypts secrete phenolic inhibitors into the soil, & mosses lower pH (to 3!) of water in contact with them to limit invasion of other species • Reproductive aggressiveness may limit seeding of other plants (Arundo donax, Phragmites, communis) • Sediment capture from wind (dune areas) or water (riparian) by certain species, after microbial intervention, can change nutrient cycles • Animal activity (grazing, digging, seed predation, forest clearance) play a role (eg: tree destruction by elephants creates shrubby ecotones) • Most internal factors still driven by external (moss may change pH, but external conditions must still favour its growth initially)

  9. Character of ecotone • (a) gradual - common in nature, such as transition from grassland to woodland • (b) discontinuous – common where a species reaches tolerance limit (such as with salinity, temperature, soil pollutants, water levels) or biological competition • (c) hysteretic – occurs where there is some degree of latency in the system Shugart, 1990 • (d) multiple responses – common where other characters are also relevant, or where there is a complex evolutionary/historical relationship

  10. Permeability • Ecotones are important for movement of both animal species & materials/energy (such as resources moved by ants from one patch to another • Permeability: a measure of the capacity of an ecotone to deflect movement of a vector (Wiens et al, 1985) • Differs with vector strength (wind, water), and material will be deposited where kinetic drop is greater Wiens, 1992 • Topography affects dimension of the energy/material fluxes through an ecotone due to kinetic energy & surface:volume ratio • Eg: beaver dams have a high s:v ratio, increasing changes at borders. Also, reduced kinetic energy results in deposition of sediment • High contrast between patches causes true impermeable barriers (common in human-induced areas, rare in nature)

  11. Animal movement • Movement across ecotones is non-random & complex • Depends on: • Passive diffusion: depends on patch character, diffusion rate & heterogeneity • Active diffusion: active movement, dependent on movement rate & type, organism density in patch & habitat preferences • Probability of edge encounter: Animals may not encounter ecotones – depends on arrangement, shape & size • Decision to cross: can be modelled as a cost-benefit analysis given species-specific predation & resource constraints • Permeability tends to increase with increasing animal body size. http://home.earthlink.net/~gastropod/bvrdm.JPG

  12. Role in landscape • Modify type, extent & direction of movements between landscape components • (eg: riverine woodland increases field stability for agriculture, whilst at the same time providing habitat for the insects that feed on crops) • Reduce negative impacts of wind & some disturbances on patches, & modify soil & temperature character • Edge effects generally increase biodiversity (not for all species), and so may act as refugia for species. • (eg: amphibians tend to live in ecotones, spend their lives in terrestrial habitats, but move to ponds to breed • Likewise, birds may roost in forest but feed in ecotones. • Often possible to predict overall biodiversity by examining ecotone density. • Greatest biodiversity occurs with optimal blend of patches & ecotones

  13. Ecotone density Naiman et al., 1988

  14. Climate change • Since ecotones may be edges of species tolerances, range shifts can be observed here first • Ecotones used to study vegetation shift (Delcourt & Delcourt, 1987) • Ecotones have differing fragility: mountain ecotones may show change first • Increasing temperatures will dry soils. Although many species can adapt their ecophysiology, broad scale changes will result • Biome-level ecotones will experience reduced biodiversity http://www.aphasiahelp.org/ourpages/brett/images/kokerboom_quivertree.jpg • The quiver tree (Aloe dichotoma) is dying on the northern extremes of its range, and advancing on the southern ecotone (Midgely et al., 2005)

  15. Economics • Historically settlement is associated with ecotones (lakes, river deltas, sea coasts) (Desaigues, 1990) • Productivity of a system is assured by ecotones • Removing ecotones was useful (lagoons, marshes, woodland matrices) because it made land available, but has long term effects in breaking nutrient/water cycles • Eg: removal of riparian forest increases water eutrophication as well as the chance of floods • Hedges in Britain acted as windbreaks and changed microclimate of soil, but agriculture intensification has caused their removal • Large ecotones (marshes & river meanders) are too expensive to recover • Hence it is important to preserve these systems to act as functional entities & biodiversity refugia

  16. Summary • Transition zones between adjacent systems, with characters defined by scale & interactions between these zones • Situated where rate & dimension of ecological transfers changes • Found at all spatial (biome to individual) & temporal (millennia – daily) scales • Hard to study because patterns vanish under close examination • Selectively permeable to organisms and abiotic factors • Play a vital role in human-disturbed landscapes for biodiversity maintenance • Display changes in climatic conditions because species exist at the edge of their ranges • Zones in which human activity developed are economically useful structures

  17. References • Clements, F.C. (1905) Research methods in ecology. University Publishing Co. Lincoln, Nebraska, USA • Desaigues, B. (1990) The socio-economic value of ecotones. In: Naiman, R.J. & Decamps, H. (eds). The ecology and management of aquatic-terrestrial ecotones. MAB, UNESCO, Paris • Farina, A. (1998) Principles and Methods in Landscape Ecology. Chapman & Hall, London, UK • Forman, R.T.T. & Moore, P.N. (1992) Theoretical foundations for understanding boundaries in landscape mosaics. In: Hansen, A.J. a& di Castri, F. (eds). Landscape boundaries. Consequences for biotic diversity and ecological flows. Springer-Verlag, New York • Midgley, G.M., Hughes, G., Thuiller, W., Drew, G. & Foden, W. (2005)Assessment of potential climate change impacts on Namibia’s floristic diversity, ecosystem structure and function. SANBI, Cape Town, UK • Naiman, R.J., Holland, M.M., Decamps, H. & Risser, P.G. (1988) A new UNESCO program: research and management of land:inland water ecotones. Biology International, Special Issue 17: 107-136 • Odum, E.P. (1959) Fundamentals of ecology, 2nd editions. W.B.Saunders Company, Philadelphia • Ricklefs, R.E. (1973) Ecology. Chiron Press • Shugart, H.H. (1990) Ecological models and the ecotones. In: Naiman, R.J. & Decamps, H. (eds). The ecology and management of aquatic-terrestrial ecotones. MAB, UNESCO, Paris, • Turner, S.R., O’Neill, R.V., Conley, W., Conley, M., & Humphries, H. (1990 ) Pattern and scale: statistics for landscape ecology. In: Turner, M.G. and Garnder, R.H. (eds). Quantitative methods in landscape ecology: the analysis and interpretation of landscape heterogeneity. Springer-Verlag, New York • Wiens, J.A., Crawford, C.S. & Gosz, R. (1985) Boundary dynamics: a conceptual framework for studying landscape ecosystems. Oikkos45: 421-427

More Related