230 likes | 482 Views
Rural Outreach and Innovation e-MFP Action Group: Lessons learned from member based MFIs on governance and strategic alliances Moderator Laurent Biot, SOS Faim Speakers Victor Chati Perez, Coop Los Andes (Peru) Alou Sidibe, Kafo Jiginew (Mali) Luis Panzer, Cresol (Brasil)
E N D
Rural Outreach and Innovation e-MFP Action Group: Lessons learned from member based MFIs on governance and strategic alliances • Moderator Laurent Biot, SOS Faim • Speakers Victor Chati Perez, Coop Los Andes (Peru) Alou Sidibe, Kafo Jiginew (Mali) Luis Panzer, Cresol (Brasil) Maira Gonzales, Coop. Jardin Azuayo (Ecuador) With contributions from Bernard Ornilla (Alterfin), Lamarana Sadio Diallo (CRG-Guinea), Anaïs Perilleux and Annabel Vanroose (CERMi) Luxemburg, November 4, 2011
Rural Outreach and Innovation e-MFP Action Group: Lessons learned from member based MFIs on governance and strategic alliances • The experience of the Savings and Credit Cooperative Los Andes (Peru) Presented by • Victor Chati Perez, Los Andes General Manager
Peru • HDI Peru: 0.723 • HDI Apurimac: 0.521 • Rank Peru: 63/169
Presentation • Created in 2001 • Coming from a rural microcredit program (1999) • Founders: 5 rural communities • Very rural focused, basically with savings and credits Some figures • Los Andes, in constant growth: • 28,620 active Members (44% women); 97 salaried workers • 21.63 M$ credit portfolio; around 85% of credit lines covered by savings. • 25.3 M$ equity and liabilities • 114.9% OSS; OE/assets 9.93% • 1,419 USD average loan size • PAR30 is 2.3%
Governance • Cooperative model • Decentralized and participatory: 12 offices and 42 service points • Every office has elected representatives • They control operations • They represent the members in the General Meeting (100 representatives) • The law prohibits participation of the members in the credit committee but they design the credit policy • For this model to be performing, Los Andes puts its efforts at two levels: • Cooperative training • Territorial focus: the Coop acts as an active actor in local development
Strategic Alliances • Natural alliances with local partners: Villages associations / Farmers´ associations and local governments • Strategic alliances with international development organizations • But in the current context and for the model to be sustainable at long term, need to build new alliances with peers • Creation of CIDERURAL (2008): Second floor cooperative Objective is to: • Exchange experiences and to learn from each other • Economies of scale (TA, training, audits etc.) • Financing possibilities • Lobby, national representation • Creation of the Union of cooperatives from Apurimac (2011): with any type of cooperative • Make the local economy more dynamic • Representation
Rural Outreach and Innovation e-MFP Action Group: Lessons learned from member based MFIs on governance and strategic alliances • The experience of Kafo Jiginew (Mali) Presented by • Alou Sidibe, Kafo Jiginew General Manager
Mali • HDI: 0.309 • Rank: 160/169
Presentation • Created in 1987 in the South of Mali: cotton area • Supported by an NGO consortium and the Crédit Coopératif Français • Took its autonomy in 1994 • Network: 19 local branches – 5 Regional Delegations – 1 Union – 167 service points Kafo in figures of September 2011 • 302,000 Members – With 27% of women • 647 employees • Credit portfolio reaches: 33.29 millions of dollars (M$) and total savings: 32.64 M$ • 106.2% operationally self-sufficiency and 98.5% FSS • OE/Assets: 13.48% – Borrowers/staff: 84 • 612 $ average loan size • 7.3% PaR30
Governance • Reconfiguration Finalized in 2010 • From 113 local branches to 19 branches • But conserve the 167 service points • From 22 elected presidents at Union BoD to 9 • Advantages: • Increases efficiency (speeds up decision process) • Reduces strongly the operating expenses • Easier to meet regulatory norms • Improves professionalization • Disadvantages: • Weakens the link with members
Governance • Diversification in order to reduce risk (reduce dependency on cotton sector) • Geographic diversification • Creation of new local branches • Urban: Bamako and Kayes • Rural: Office du Niger • Head Office transfer to Bamako • Sectorial • Diversification of services • Finance new activities (other activities than cotton production) • Result: the portfolio dependency on the cotton sector reduced from 85% to 45%
Strategic Alliances • Multiple partnerships • Strategy convergence (defined by Kafo Jiginew) • E.g. Geographic diversification • Rural – Office du Niger (rice) (SOS Faim – FAIR) • Urban – Bamako (with own funds) • One crucial partner: the Confédération des Institutions Financières (CIF) • Regional partnership: CIF groups 6 financial cooperative networks in 5 West-African countries • Same type of institutions: know very well the challenges of each other • Exchange of experiences and expertise - E.g. Reference group on agricultural finance • Increases independence from external technical support • Possibilities to implement new tools and to mutualize services, e.g. bank and insurance company
Rural Outreach and Innovation e-MFP Action Group: Lessons learned from member based MFIs on governance and strategic alliances • The experience of CRESOL (Brazil) Presented by • Luis Panzer, CRESOL General Director
II. CasoslatinosII.3. CRESOL Brazil • HDI: 0.699 • Rank: 73/169
Presentation • Created in 1995, with the objective to help local rural communities to access credit and savings • Coming from social movements • Works intensively with government programs • Decentralized institution: network of cooperatives (79) composed by rural families • Active in two Southern regions of Brazil, currently considering expansion • CRESOL in figures of December 2010: • 41,200 savers and 45,023 active borrowers (18.38% women) • 100% rural activities • 417.7 M$ credit portfolio and 137.3 M$ savings • 118.6% OSS; OE/ assets: 5.36% • 3,800 USD average loan size • 2.81% PaR30
Governance • The MBOs are all initiated locally and directed towards rural families; average number of members: 500-2,000. • CRESOL puts a lot of effort in the decentralization of the COOP so that the management stays in the hands of the farmers. Therefore all members and directors receive training. • All committees (e.g. credit, audit) are composed of members and consequently decisions are taken by the community • Recently discussion towards putting “managers” in charge of the operational tasks • Three level system: local, regional and central level • MBO is a network: have local and regional meetings and a central cooperative who manages the IT system, is responsible for audit, lobby and advocacy towards external partners • Principio Solidario: Local COOP is “guaranteed” in case of default, by its regional service centre who covers 70% of the losses
Strategic Alliances • All the cooperatives have constructed alliances with local organizations (trade unions, NGOs, producer oriented cooperatives) => member has access to different services • Has developed different activities with other institutions • Training activities (training of credit officers) with Infocos • To create access to insurance products for its members, CRESOL created alliances with MAFRE, Liberty, HDI etc. • The CRESOL system has national alliances with the government, banks and national cooperative systems. • Banco de Brasil (public-private bank) and the BNDES (National Development Bank) • Central CRESOL is member of Unicafes (National Union of Cooperatives) and Confesol (National Union of Credit Cooperatives) • Support of international partners such as Trias, Rabobank Foundation, BRS etc. • Receives technical support which have been decisive in the growth process
Rural Outreach and Innovation e-MFP Action Group: Lessons learned from member based MFIs on governance and strategic alliances • The experience of Savings and Credit Cooperative Jardin Azuayo (Ecuador) Presented by • Maira Gonzales, Jardin Azuayo Treasurer
Ecuador • HDI: 0.695 • Rank: 77/169
Presentation • Created in 1996, as a response to local disaster in the village of Paute • Currently the second biggest MBO in terms of assets in Ecuador • Decentralized institution: 27 offices and 3 service points • JA in figures of October 2011: • 205,000 Members (52% women borrowers); 289 employees • 70% rural members • 205 M$ credit portfolio and 191.5 M$ voluntary savings • 120.7% OSS and OE/assets: 4.14% • 4.830 USD average loan size • 2.80 % PaR30
Governance • Cooperative model - Training focus: Educational programs towards members, directors and employees Effects: • Strong appropriation and embeddedness, people know very well the cooperative • Contributes to local development • Social control of the operational part of JA • Balance between social and financial objectives • Decentralized governance model, except for the technical areas of the 27 offices Effects • Services and products adapted towards the needs of the clients For example: remittances, shared financial services within national cooperatives
Strategic Alliances • Started with the support of a local NGO called CECCA (NGO specialized in education and training of farmers) but without international support. • Local development organizations • Red de Mujeres de Paute, local governments, producer organizations Effects: Alliances, part of local development, knowledge of the environment etc. • Member of several microfinance networks in Ecuador • Red Financiera Rural, Ucacsur y FINANCOOP: ratings, publications, trainings, product support Effects: representativeness, knowledge development, products and services, financing • International partners and organizations • Since 2003 started to build international alliances: FUSM, BID (B-loan), Alterfin Effects: technical support, long term financing, development of new products