1 / 18

A.P.D.R.P.

welcomes State Power Ministers, State Secretaries, Chairpersons & CEOs of SEBs/Utilities Secretaries to the Govt Of India Chairpersons/CMDs/CEOs of CPSUS/Central Authorities To presentation on. A.P.D.R.P. By: Arvind Jadhav, JS (Dist.) June 12 th 2003 Vigyan Bhavan. APDRP

cassie
Download Presentation

A.P.D.R.P.

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. welcomes State Power Ministers, State Secretaries, Chairpersons & CEOs of SEBs/Utilities Secretaries to the Govt Of India Chairpersons/CMDs/CEOs of CPSUS/Central Authorities To presentation on A.P.D.R.P. By: Arvind Jadhav, JS (Dist.) June 12th 2003 Vigyan Bhavan

  2. APDRP • Accelerated Power Development & Reforms Programme as a Six level Intervention Strategy for distribution reforms to • Reduce AT&C losses to 15% • Reduce in outages & interruptions • Increase in consumer satisfaction • Bring about commercial viability in the power sector TIME FRAME 4 YEARS (TENTH PLAN PERIOD) • Expected outlay of Rs. 40,000 Crore as additional central plan assistance to State Governments during Tenth five year plan. • Rs. 20,000 Crore for strengthening & up gradation of sub-transmission and distribution networks under INVESTMENT COMPONENT. • Rs. 20,000 Crore grant to the states for reduction in the cash loss by the SEBs/Utilities under INCENTIVE COMPONENT.

  3. APDRP (Contd..) • APDRP was necessitated due to the reason that the State Electricity Boards have accumulated huge financial losses and have accrued huge outstanding dues to CPSUs. • The cumulative losses of SEBs were Rs. 33,000 Crore in 2001-02, - about 1.5% of GDP. • Aggregate Technical & Commercial (AT&C) losses = 50-60%. • 80 percent losses in the distribution and entirely Commercial • One percent reduction in losses = Savings of Rs 700 – 800 Crore • Ten percent reduction in losses = Equivalent to 10,000 -12000 MW

  4. INVESTMENT COMPONENT • Assistance to the states for strengthening and up gradation of sub-transmission and distribution network • Focus on Urban areas & High Density Networks where the maximum losses occur • Assistance is 50% of the project cost • Balance 50% of the project cost arranged by utilities as counterpart fund – PFC & REC assistance available • Special category states get 100% assistance (90% grant & 10%loan) • Projects sanctioned (Towns covered 467): July 2002: Rs. 4500.37 Crore Sept. 2002: Rs. 3983.90 Crore Nov. 2003: Rs. 5218.89 Crore May 2003: Rs. 1938.55 Crore Total: Rs. 15641.71 Crore

  5. INVESTMENT COMPONENTContd.. • Funds released : Rs. 1756 Crore • Counter part funds tied up: Rs. 4562.61Cr. out of Rs. 6904.11 Cr. • Counter part funds drawn: Rs. 493.71 Crore • Funds utilised: Rs.1206.87 Crore. • Orders placed : Rs. 419.5 Crore. • NITs issued for Rs. 2263 Crore. as on 31-05-2003

  6. INCENTIVE COMPONENT • To motivate the SEBs/Utilities to reduce their financial losses. • Incentive50% of the actual cash loss reduction • 100% grant • Cash losses are calculatednet of subsidy and receivables. • Income on actuals and Expenditure on accrual basis. • Base year: 2000-01for first time eligibility • For subsequent years: Incentive onincremental reduction of losses • Annual accounts need toAudited by C&AG

  7. INCENTIVE (Contd…) • Incentive and amount released: (Rs. in Crore) StateNet Cash Admissible Amount released Loss Red.AmountBy MOF Gujarat 1072.3536.15236.37 Maharashtra 579.74289.87137.89 Haryana 10.025.015.01 Total 1662.06831.03379.27 • Balance amount to be released in the current year. • More States are expected to become eligible for 2002-03 • Guidelines being circulated in the Conference

  8. IMPROVEMENTS IN DISTRIBUTION SECTOR . • MOA/MOU Signed by all states except Manipur & Tripura • SERC constituted in all States except in Arunachal, Bihar, Jharkhand, J&K, Manipur, Meghalaya, Mizoram, Nagaland, Sikkim and Tripura. • Tariff rationalisation started by states except Chattisgarh, Goa, Kerala & Uttaranchal in addition to above states . • Agriculture tariff introduced in all States including Punjab & Tamilnadu, • Separation of Subsidy: Directly to farmers @ Rs 1000 per farmer by Tamil Nadu • M. P. has restricted free agriculture supply to SC and ST BPL consumers only.

  9. IMPROVEMENTS IN DISTRIBUTION SECTOR • Delhi, Haryana, Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh, Uttaranchal, Madhya Pradesh, Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka & Orissa have unbundled/corporatised • Orissa and Delhi have privatised distribution • Micro privatisation – rural franchisee – Orissa, Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka • Village bodies taking over electricity distribution – Nagaland, Gujarat, Karnataka, Madhya Pradesh . • All States securitised outstanding dues of CPSUs except Arunachal, Delhi, Manipur, Mizoram, Tripura, .

  10. IMPROVEMENTS Contd • 11 kV Feeder metering : 100% by 11 states and > 90% by 5 states • Consumer metering : 100% by 5 states and > 90% by 4 states • Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka, Madhya Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh, West Bengal, Gujarat and Maharashtra have enacted the anti theft legislation • Punjab, Bihar & Kerala have also taken step in this direction. • Provision has helped the states in reduction of theft in a big way & revenue collection has increased

  11. Improvements - APDRP • The 11kV feeder metering level has increased from 65.3% in 2001 to 87.8%. • The consumer metering level has increased from 74.7% in 2001 to 84%. • All new connections are being released with meters. • Cash loss reduced by Gujarat, Maharashtra & Haryana in 2001-02. • Assam, M.P. Rajasthan, U.P. & West Bengal have also indicated reduction in cash loss. • Metering, billing & collection efficiencies have increased in most of the APDRP project areas. • Increase in revenue realisation per unit of energy supplied has been reported by most of the states.

  12. General Issues - APDRP • Transfer of fund by State Govt. to SEB/Utility • Slow progress in implementation of sanctioned projects • Suggestion : performance guaranteed turnkey approach • Counterpart funding not tied up • Procurement of Quality Product. • Standard specifications have been provided by NTPC & POWERGRID • Quality plan for proper implementation • Completion of system metering and consumer metering • Energy accounting & auditing: Should start for metered feeders • Consumer Index linking • Introducing Reliability Index for all the State and District Headquarters

  13. General Issues - APDRP • Special drives to convert unauthorised connections to authorised one • Preventive maintenance to reduce failure and outages in the distribution network • Adopting Best Practices • States are required to take administrative, technical and commercial measures to improve their performance • Benchmarks of Parameters already done. • Capacity building at JE and field level to be given attention • Assistance will be provided by Central level Institutions and also funding of Utilities’ efforts in Training

  14. General Issues - Reforms • States not filing Annual Revenue Receipts with SERCs • Utilities have not filed tariff petitions • States to submit Action plan for turnaround by 2007 • Restructuring of Capital to reduce interest burden – State loans to SEBs • Action to be initiated under anti theft provisions of the Electricity Act 2003 and State legislations • Release of subsidies in cash by States to Utilities • Clearing of electricity dues of local bodies and state organizations • Implementing the provisions of the Electricity Act 2003

  15. State Specific issues – Distribution reforms • Manipur and Tripura yet to sign MOAs • Bihar, Jharkhand, Jammu & Kashmir, Manipur, Meghalaya, Mizoram, Nagaland, & Tripura need to set up SERCs • Chattisgarh, Goa, Kerala, Uttaranchal have not issued tariff orders • Arunachal, Manipur, Mizoram & Tripura yet to securitize CPSU outstandings • 11 kv feeder metering - Below 90 percent states Bihar, Chattisgarh, Jharkhand, Maharashtra, Orissa, Rajasthan, Arunachal, Manipur, Meghalaya, Mizoram, Nagaland & Sikkim • Consumer metering – below 75 percent states Chattisgarh, Jharkhand, M.P, U.P, Arunachal, J&K, Meghalaya, Mizoram, Nagaland & Sikkim.

  16. State specific issues -APDRP • Jharkhand, Arunachal Pradesh & Tripura to initiate action for implementation of 2000-01 projects. • Slow progress (less than 50%) by Bihar, Maharashtra, Orissa, Punjab, West Bengal, Assam & J&K for 2000-01 projects. • Delay in tie up of counter part funding by Bihar, Chattisgarh, Goa, Jharkhand, M.P, Orissa & Rajasthan. • No action on projects sanctioned in 2002-03 by Arunachal Pradesh, Manipur, Tripura & West Bengal. • Slow implementation by Jharkhand, Kerala, Madhya Pradesh, Punjab, Himachal Pradesh & Uttar Pradesh.

  17. Thank You

More Related