270 likes | 377 Views
Much Ado About Nothing?. Command Relations in Amphibious Operations CAPT Don Inbody, USN. “You can get your planes to do anything you want, but we can’t get the Air Force to do a goddam thing!” Lt. Gen. Patton to VADM Hewitt July 1943. At Issue.
E N D
Much Ado About Nothing? Command Relations in Amphibious Operations CAPT Don Inbody, USN
“You can get your planes to do anything you want, but we can’t get the Air Force to do a goddam thing!” Lt. Gen. Patton to VADM Hewitt July 1943
At Issue • What is the best command relationship between CATF and CLF? • OPCON Command (Doctrinal) • Support Command (Test) • Joint Pub 3-02 • Test Pub 3-02
Amphibious History • Historical Examples • Examine Command Relations • Landing Force Commander • Navy Force Commander • Determine major contentious issues for the commanders
Historical Examples (33) • Veracruz Expedition • Civil War Western Campaign • Gallipoli • Guadalcanal • North Africa • Sicily • Salerno • New Guinea Campaign (15 landings) • Tarawa (2 landings) • Marianas (3 landings) • Normandy • Southern France • Leyte • Iwo Jima • Okinawa • Inchon
Command Relations Regimes • Cooperation (Support Command) • OPCON Command • Expeditionary OPCON
Gallipoli • Cooperation • Technical problems with landing • Technical problems with C2 • No problems related to command relations
Guadalcanal • Expeditionary OPCON • Landing Force Opcon to ATF • Issue: CVs supporting ATF • Issue: CATF Controlling movements of landing force.
Sicily • Cooperation • Issue: Air/CV Support • Airborne movements not coordinated
Salerno • Cooperation (Support Command) • Withdrawal from landing beach • Issue: Air Support (cooperative) • CV Support
New Guinea Campaign • Cooperation (3 landings) • OPCON (12 landings) • Issue: CV support • MacArthur presence (Strong CinC) Mitigated command relations problems
Leyte • OPCON Command • Issue: CV Support of ATF
Marianas • OPCON Command • Issue: Corps Control of Separated landings (resolved)
Iwo Jima • Issue: Pre D-day NGFS • resolved for Okinawa
Cooperation (Support) Issues • Gallipoli C2 from ship to shore • New Guinea CV Support (x3) • Sicily Air/CV Support • Sicily Airborne coordination
Expeditionary OPCON Issues • Guadalcanal CV Support
OPCON Command Issues • Salerno Air Support • New Guinea CV Support (x8) • Marianas CLF Corps Cmd • Leyte CV Support • Iwo Jima Pre D-day Fires
Conclusions • Air/CV Support is principal issue • Large carriers never under CATF control • Land Based Air power not responsive to CLF control • CATF & CLF relationship • Different command relationship would not have solved most issues
Conclusions (cont) • Landing Force Commander must have equal access to higher headquarters • Strong JFC can mitigate coordination issues • JFC’s presence • MacArthur (SWPA, Inchon) • Spruance • Clear commander’s guidance
Conclusions (cont) • CATF will ultimately support CLF
Implications for Joint Force Cdr • JFC must provide clear guidance for air support • JFC must provide clear commander’s guidance to CLF and CATF
Much Ado About Nothing? Maybe so...
“Land Officers have no pretense to command at sea. Sea Officers have no pretense to command on land.”Royal Navy Signal Book1744