620 likes | 788 Views
Bisphosphonate Therapy for Non-Cancer Pain. Marco Pappagallo, MD Director, Pain Medicine Research & Development Professor, Department of Anesthesiology Mount Sinai School of Medicine, NY. Bone Pain.
E N D
Bisphosphonate Therapy for Non-Cancer Pain Marco Pappagallo, MDDirector, Pain Medicine Research & DevelopmentProfessor, Department of AnesthesiologyMount Sinai School of Medicine, NY
Bone Pain bisphosphonates widely used in the battle against cancer-related bone pain
What we were taught BONE INNERVATION ONLY IN THE PERIOSTIUM !? Adapted from: Patrick Mantyh, PhD, The mechanisms and pharmacology of bone pain AAPM 2005 Annual Meeting Lecture
REVISITING BONE INNERVATION Adapted from: Patrick Mantyh, PhD, The mechanisms and pharmacology of bone pain AAPM 2005 Annual Meeting Lecture
REVISITING BONE INNERVATION Adapted from: Patrick Mantyh, PhD, The mechanisms and pharmacology of bone pain AAPM 2005 Annual Meeting Lecture
calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) nerve fibers In bone, small nerve fibersexpress • Transient Receptor Potential Vanilloid Subtype 1 (TRPV1) – i.e., the capsaicin receptor • High affinity Tyrosine Kinase Receptors (Trka) for NGF (nerve growth factor)
BONE PAIN MECHANISMS role of NGF • expression enhanced in bone inflammation, bone cancer, trauma, fractures • produced by many cellular elements • induces hyperalgesia via upregulation of transcription for genes encoding pain receptors (e.g. capsaicin receptor TRPV1)
BONE PAIN MECHANISMS role of NGF Adapted from: Patrick Mantyh, PhD, The mechanisms and pharmacology of bone pain AAPM 2005 Annual Meeting Lecture
Bone Pain Mechanismsrole of protons (H+) • Acidic microenvironment (pH 4.0) due to release of protons from activated OSTEOCLASTS • Low pH activates TRPV1 and ASICs (Acid-Sensing Ion Channels)
HISTORY OF BISPHOSPHONATES • Designed as synthetic analogues of pyrophosphate • Initially used in industry as water softening agents in irrigation systems
PYROPHOSPHATE • blocks precipitation of calcium phosphate in plasma, urine, and soft tissues • commonly used as an anti-tartar agent in toothpaste • In the body, rapidly hydrolyzed by alkaline phosphatase
Pyrophosphate Generic Bisphosphonate
HISTORY OF BISPHOSPHONATES • Etidronate, first bisphosphonate for medical use • In 1969, bisphosphonates discovered as bone loss inhibitors
Etidronate Clodronate Tiludronate Pamidronate Alendronate Risedronate Ibandronate Zoledronate
FDA approved indications • Hypercalcemia of Malignancy • Osteolytic Bone Metastases • Osteoporosis • Paget’s disease of bone
BISPHOSPHONATES • chemical adsorption onto hydroxyapatite • cellular uptake by osteoclasts, macrophages, tumor cells, etc
Bioavailability • Less than 1% of the oral dose absorbed • GI absorption suppressed by food intake • For a more rapid and effective action, bisphosph can be given by IV infusion.
PHARMACOKINETICS • transient distribution to liver and other organs • as a sponge, metabolically active bone adsorbs IV dose • pharmacokinetics is complex; bisphs remain attached to bone for weeks to months • amount of drug released in plasma related to rate of bone metabolism and turnover
Non-nitrogen-containing Bisphosphonates • First generation bisphos, such as ETIDRONATE, TILUDRONATE, and CLODRONATE • accumulation of a cytotoxic ATP analogue compound
Nitrogen-containing Bisphosphonates • Most recent bisphos, e.g., ALENDRONATE, PAMIDRONATE, ZOLEDRONATE, RISEDRONATE, and IBANDRONATE • Block addition of hydrophobic molecules to proteins ; important for cell membrane function and sub-cellular protein trafficking
Anti-Osteoclast Effect • Inhibition of osteoclast activity, and reduction of their life span • Bisphos may affect other cellular elements present in bone (e.g., endothelial cells, ostocytes, mast-cells, macrophages)
Preclinical Studies DOSE DEPENDENT ANALGESIC EFFECT in animal models of inflammatory pain, cancer pain, neuropathic pain • Goicoechea et al., J Pharmacol, 1999; • Cui et al., Pain, 2000; • Oelzner et al. Inflamm Res,2000; • Bonabello et al., Pain, 2001; • Walker et al., Pain , 2002; • Harada et al., Inflamm Res,2004; • Kawabata et al., Neuropharmacology, 2006; • Bianchi et al., European Journal of Pain, 2007;
IV Pamidronate as Analgesic • Metastatic bone pain • Ankylosing spondylitis • Paget’s disease • Rheumatoid arthritis • CRPS/RSD • Chronic back pain Hortobagyi et al., 1996; Lipton et al., 1994; Maksymowych et al., 1998; Van Offel et al., 2001; Maccagno et al., 1994; Kubalek et al., 2001; Fulfaro et al., 1998; Varenna et al., 2000; Pappagallo et al,. 2003
IV BISPHOSPHONATES for metastatic bone pain IV bisphos treatment for hypercalcemia due to bone metastases associated with a quick relief of severe cancer bone pain Fulfaro et al., 1998; Hortobagyi et al., 1996; Purohit et al. 1994; Coleman et al. 1997
IV Bisphosphonates for Ankylosing Spondylitis Two open-label trials and a RCT indicate that IV pamidronate can reduce morning stiffness and back pain in patients with NSAID-refractory ankylosing spondylitis (AS) Maksymowych et al J Rheumatol 1998; Maksymowych et al., J Rheumatol 2001; Maksymowych et al., Arthritis Rheum 2002;46:766–73.
IV Bisphosphonates for Paget’s Disease of Bone Bisphos play a relevant therapeutic role in modifying the disease course, and improving pain and mobility Walsh et al. Bone 2004;34:747–54., Bombassei et al., Am J Med Sci 1994. Vasireddy et al., Clin Rheumatol 2003;22:376–80.
IV Bisphosphonates for Rheumatoid Arthritis Some evidence of benefit, in the management of pain and prevention of bone erosions Rovetta et al. Minerva Med 2003; Jarrett et al., Arthritis Rheum 2006; Romas E. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2005;
IV Pamidronate for Chronic Mechanical Back Pain • Patients (n=25) with NSAIDs-refractory chronic LBP and with no osteoporotic fractures or metastatic disease • Average pain decreased from baseline by 3.6 points (on 0–10 NRS) • Bisphosph-related pain relief not associated with an increase in opioid analgesics . Pappagallo et al., J Pain Symptom Manage 2003;
A Pilot Trial of IV Pamidronate for Low Back Pain ClinicalTrials.gov - Identifier:NCT00101790Sponsored by the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke • Four study groups, each group with subjects randomly assigned to pamidronate (n=7) or to placebo (n=4) • Dosage: 30 mg of PAM in the 1st group, 60 mg in the 2nd group, and 90 mg in the 3rd group • Subjects in the 4th group will receive 2 treatments of best tolerated / more effective PAM dose
CRPS/RSD Marco Pappagallo, MD
CRPS / RSD IASP DIAGNOSTIC CRITERIA • Inciting Noxious Event (e.g.,trauma) or a Cause of Limb Immobilization (e.g., cast, stroke) • Pain, Allodynia / Hyperesthesia disproportionate in severity to any inciting noxious event • At some point in time, evidence of regional abnormal skin color / To changes, edema, sudomotor activity • CRPS 1:Diagnosis of Exclusion
Technetium-99 Bisphosphonate in Bone Scintigraphy • May show regional skeletal changes in several cases of CRPS • Utilizes a technetium-99 radio-labeled bisphosphonate (medronate, oxidronate) as an intravenous marker
3 phase BONE SCAN FINDINGS 1. HYPERFUSION in theblood pool phase(2 min after infusion) 2.INCREASED PERIARTICULAR TRACER UPTAKE during the mineralization phase (3 hrs after infusion) Reportedly 50% sensitivity 90% specificity The BONE SCANtracer is a bisphosphonate mixed with radioactivetechnetium and injected for detecting abnormal bone metabolism and disease. Higher Sensitivity inCRPS of < 6 mo.
IV PAMIDRONATE • Maillefert et al., 1995; open label • Cortet et al., 1997; open label • Kubalek et al., 2001; open label • Robinson et al., 2004; RCT IV CLODRONATE 5. Varenna et al., 2000; RCT IV, ORAL ALENDRONATE 6. Adamiet al., 1997; open label 7. Manicourt et al., 2004; RCT
IV PAMIDRONATE FOR CRPS • Maillefert et al. 1995: improvement in 7 of 11 patients • Cortet et al., 1997: improvement in pain and physical function in 10 women and 13 men • Kubalek et al., 2001: excellent pain relief in 25 of 29 patients from IV pam at 60 mg/day for 3 consecutive days • Robinson et al, 2004: RCT (n=27) of IV pam 60 mg as a single dose vs. placebo; significant improvement in pain and function at 1 and 3 months postinfusion (active treatment group n=14)
IV Clodronate • Varenna et al, (2000): RCT (N=32) of IV clodronate, efficacy at 6 mo, after 300 mg daily for 10 days (active tx group, n=15);urine NTx as predictive factor for efficacy IV / Oral Alendronate • Adami et al.,(1997): IV alendronate relieved CRPS by at least 50% in 13 patients out of 20 • Manicourt et al.,(2004): in a RCT (N=40) of oral alendronate, efficacy (improvement in pain and joint mobility) for post-traumatic CRPS of the lower extremity at 3 mo after 40 mg daily for 8 wks (alendronate-treated group, n = 19)
Open label pilot trial of IV ibandronate for CRPSBreuer B, Pappagallo M, Goldfarb R, et al., The Journal of Pain, 2007 • Objectives: • assess safety of IV ibandronate 6mg daily for 3 days in patients with CRPS • evaluate analgesia • explore correlation between tx response and bone scan findings
IV Ibandronate for CRPS/RSD:Results (N=10) at 3 mo Post-intervention • Patient Global Impression of Change: • 4 subjects with much improvement • 6 subjects with minimal improvement • Brief Pain Inventory: significantly lower than baseline for average pain p = 0.007; worst pain p = 0.004 • Neuropathic Pain Scale:descriptors significantly improved for • unpleasantness, sensitivity, depth, intensity, surface, heat, cold, sharpness, and dullness.
IV Ibandronate for CRPS/RSD • Aside from transitory flu-like symptoms, ibandronate was well tolerated • No hypocalcemia or delayed adverse events reported
IV Ibandronate for CRPS/RSD: Bone Scan Findings in the Affected Limb • Uptake (compared with contralateral limb) • 5 subjects with an increased uptake • 2 subjects with a decrease uptake • 3 subjects with no difference • Subjects (N=5) with positive bone scans improved more than those having decreased uptake (N=2) in neuropathic pain qualities (p≤0.03)
IV Ibandronate for CRPS/RSD - Conclusion • A subgroup of patients with CRPS appear to have bisphos-responsive pain • Bone pain mechanisms maintaining some of the symptoms of CRPS
IV Bisphosphonates CONTRA-INDICATIONS & SIDE-EFFECTS
IV Bisphosphonates CONTRA-INDICATIONS • Pregnancy • Renal, Hepatic mod-severe Disease • Hypocalcemia • Poor Oral Hygiene and Active Endodontic / Periodontal Disease
SIDE EFFECTS • IV Bisphosphonates well tolerated when appropriately administrated • associated with transient and manageable (e.g., acute phase reaction)side effects • However, there is an emergent concern about a complication known as osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ)
toothpaste with pyrophosphate should probably be discouraged in patients with exposed bone