40 likes | 154 Views
Quantum and probabilistic finite multitape automata. Ginta Garkaje and Rusins Freivalds Riga, Latvia. First, we discuss the following 2-tape language L 1 = {(0 n 1 m ,2 k )| n=m=k }.
E N D
Quantum and probabilistic finite multitape automata Ginta Garkajeand Rusins Freivalds Riga, Latvia
First, we discuss the following 2-tape language L1 = {(0n1m,2k)| n=m=k } Theorem. The language L1 can be recognized with arbitrary probability 1-ε by a probabilistic 2-tape finite automaton. 2n + 3m = 5k 3n + 6m = 9k 2n + 9m = 11k SOFSEM 2009
} Theorem. There exists no quantum finite 2-tape automaton which recognizes the language L41 with bounded error. For arbitrary positive ε, there exists a probabilistic finite 2-tape automaton recognizing the language L41 with a probability 1-ε. are binary words and either x=y ory=z but not both of them.} There exists no probabilistic finite 2-tape automaton which recognizes language L42 with abounded error. There exists a quantum finite 2-tape automaton recognizing the language L42 with a probability 1-ε. SOFSEM 2009
} Theorem. For arbitrary r, there exists a quantum finite 2-tape automaton recognizing the language L43 with the probability 1. For arbitrary r, there exists no quantum finite 2-tape automaton with 2 Ω(r/log r) states which recognizes the language L43 with abounded error. For arbitrary r, and for arbitrary positive ε there exists a probabilistic finite 2-tape automaton with const. r states recognizing the language L43 with probability 1- ε. Theorem. For arbitrary r, there exists quantum finite 2-tape automaton with 2 Ω(r/log r) states which recognizes the language L44 with the probability 1. For arbitrary r, there exists no probabilistic finite 2-tape automaton with 2 Ω(r/log r) states which recognizes the language L44 with the probability 1. SOFSEM 2009