1 / 8

Sudan CHF 2012 1 st Round Sector Defense Sector: Basic Infrastructure Jan 17 th , 2012

Sudan CHF 2012 1 st Round Sector Defense Sector: Basic Infrastructure Jan 17 th , 2012. CHF Sector Priorities Facilitate humanitarian access to at-risk populations, resuming market access. Restart daily livelihood activities.

casta
Download Presentation

Sudan CHF 2012 1 st Round Sector Defense Sector: Basic Infrastructure Jan 17 th , 2012

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Sudan CHF 2012 1st Round Sector Defense Sector: Basic Infrastructure Jan 17th, 2012

  2. CHF Sector Priorities • Facilitate humanitarian access to at-risk populations, resuming market access. Restart daily livelihood activities. • Support to conflict and disaster affected communities, including IDPs by construction of ; semi permanent community centers, rehabilitation of canal drainage, flood prevention infrastructure.

  3. CHF Geographical priorites • CHF Geographical priorities • Three Protocol Areas; • - Blue Nile (Direng, Kurmuk, Tadamun, Giessen) • - South Kordofan State (Abu Karshola - Um Baraka Road) • WestDarfur; • Trij Village. Zalingei-Garsila road. Mukjar and Habila localities. • Eastern and White Nile States. West Darfur Kasala White Nile South Kordofan Blue Nile

  4. Describe the sector strategy for addressing the priorities . • Target most urgent needs:most affected areas and critical gaps. • Seasonality: maximize dry season rehabilitation for quick impact. • Value for money: cost effectiveness. • National NGO capacity building: especially areas of restricted access • Gender and Environment Markers: core values for best practice

  5. What evidence supports your identified priority needs? Include targeted beneficiary population:- Blue Nile : Assessment identified 100,000 affected people. West Darfur : Three needs assessments Identified a total of 200,000 IDPS. South Kordofan : Assessment identified 200,000 IDPs and refugees.

  6. Why is CHF funding critical right now to meet these sector priorities? (i.e. what would happen without funding for 6 months) • Urgency to start and implement projects before the wet season (May 2012). • Ongoing IDP returns need support to access and resume former life and livelihood in functioning local markets. • Criticality of timely access for other sectors (Health, FSL,NFI.. etc) for safe humanitarian operation.

  7. How were value for money and low indirect costs ensured? • The TRG emphasized quality in project selection: cost, scope, schedule. • Where necessary, project budgets proposals were revised. • Projects were selected based on immediate access by sector partners. • Monitoring and Evaluation to be carried out by the TRG/SL: • Monthly Progress Reports. • Gantt Chart. • Field Visit. • Review/Progress Meetings • .

  8. Summary of TRG-endorsed proposals Total Requested Sector Envelope: 2,582,190 USD Total TRG-recommended amount: 1,115,000 USD Total Submitted projects: 10 Projects Total Recommended projects :- 6 Projects Recommended UN/NGO/NNGO percentage: UN - 4% NNGO -14% INGO - 82%

More Related