1 / 39

The Effects of Educational Technology in Mathematics Instruction on Student Achievement

This presentation explores the effects of educational technology in mathematics instruction on student achievement, discussing findings, implications, limitations, and policy recommendations. Various studies and meta-analyses are referenced to analyze technology integration in teaching mathematics. The impact of technology use on gender differences and special need students is highlighted. Recommendations for teacher education and future research are provided.

castellanosj
Download Presentation

The Effects of Educational Technology in Mathematics Instruction on Student Achievement

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The Effects of Educational Technology in Mathematics Instruction onStudent Achievement A presentation by Jonathan Barnes, in partial fulfillment for course Education 6390

  2. Introduction

  3. Findings

  4. Educational Technology and Student Achievement

  5. Educational Technology and Elementary Students

  6. Educational Technology and Special Need Students

  7. Educational Technology and Pedagogy

  8. Educational Technology and Gender Differences

  9. Amount and Duration of Educational Technology use

  10. Implications

  11. Policy

  12. Technology Integration

  13. Teacher Education

  14. Limitations

  15. Conclusion

  16. References

  17. 1. Anyamene, A., Nwokolo, C., Anyachebelu, F., & Anemelu, V. (2012). Effects of computer-assisted packages in mathematics in Awja, Anambra State, Nigeria. American International Journal of Contemporary Research, 2(7), 61-65. Retrived from http://www.aijcrnet.com/ 2. Arroyo, I., Burleson, W., Tai, M., Muldner, K., & Woolf, B. (2013). Gender differences in the use and benefit of advanced learning technologies f or mathematics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(4), 957-969. doi: 10.1037/a0032748 3. Aypay, A. (2010). Information and communication technology (ICT) usage and achievement of Turkish students in PISA 2006. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 9(2), 116-124. Retrieved from http://tojet.net/articles/v9i2/9213.pdf 4. Balanskat, A., Blamire, R., & Kefala, S. (2007). The ICT in report: A review of studies of ICT on schools in Europe. Retrived from http://www.aef -europe.be/documents/ RAPP_doc254_en.pdf

  18. 5. Barkatsas, A., Kasimatis, K., & Gialamas, V. (2009). Learning secondary mathematics with technology: Exploring the complex interrelationship between students’ attitudes, engagement, gender, and achievement. Computers & Education, 52, 562 -570. doi: 101016/j.compedu. 2008.11.001 6. Brown, F. (2000). Computer assisted instruction in mathematics can improve students’ test scores: A study. NABSE Journal, 2-18. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED443688 7. Cheung, A., & Slavin, R. (2013). The effectiveness of educational technology application for enhancing mathematics achievement in k-12 classrooms: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 9, 88– 113. doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2013.01.001 8. Clark, A., & Whetstone, P. (2014). The impact of an online tutoring program on mathematics achievement. The Journal of Educational Research, 107, 462–466. doi: 10.1080/00220671.2013.833075

  19. 9. Crisan, C., Lerman, S., & Winbourne, P. (2007). Mathematics and ICT: A framework for conceptualizing secondary school mathematics teachers’ classroom practices. Technology, Pedagogy, and Education, 16(1), 29–39. doi: 10.1080/147590691167991 10. Delen, E., & Bulut, O. (2011). The relationship between students’ exposure to technology and their achievement in science and math. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10(3), 311–317. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ945004 11. Eyyam, R., & Yaratan, H. (2014). Impact of use of technology in mathematics lessons on student achievement and attitudes. Social Behavior and Personality, 42, 31–42. doi: 10.2224/sbp.201442.0S31 12. Gunbas, N. (2014). Students’ mathematics word problem-solving achievement in a computer based story. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 31, 78–95. doi: 10.1111/jcal.12067 I

  20. 13. Harrison, C., Comber, C., Fisher, T., Haw, K., Lewin, C., Lunzer, E., … Watling, R. (2002). ICT in schools. Research and evaluation series No. 7: The impact of information and communication technologies on pupil learning and attainment. Retrieved from https://www.education.gov.uk/ 14. Irish, C. (2002). Using peg- and keyword mnemonics and computer-assisted instruction to enhance basic multiplication performance in elementary students with learning and cognitive disabilities. Journal of Special Education Technology, 17(4). Retrieved from http://www.editlib.org/p/96198/ 15. Jackson, A., Brummel, B., Pollet, C., & Greer, D. (2013). An evaluation of interactive table tops in elementary mathematics education. Educational Technology Reasearch Development, 61, 311–332. doi: 10.1007/s11423-013-9287-4 16. Kebritchi, M., Hirumi, A., & Bai, H. (2010). The effects of modern mathematics computer games on mathematics achievement and class motivation. Computers & Education, 55, 427–443. doi: 10.1016/ j.compedu.2010.02.007

  21. 17. Kersaint, G. (2007). Toward technology integration in mathematics education: A technology-integration course planning assignment. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 7(4), 256–278. Retrieved from http://www.citejournal.org 18. Lawal, O., Loyinmi, A., & Abolarinwa, A. (2013). Information communication technology: Supporting mathematics instruction for students with disabilities. Journal of Education and Practice, 4(8), 82 – 92. Retrieved from http://www.iiste.org/Journals/index.php/JEP/article/ view/5190 19. Leng, N., Choo, K., Soon, L., Huak, K., & Sun, Y. (2005). Effects of using a computer algebra system (CAS) on junior college students’ attitudes towards CAS and achievement in mathematics. International Journal for Technology in Mathematics Education, 12(2), 59–72. Retrieved f rom http://www.tech.plym.ac.uk/research/mathematics_education 20. Li, Q., & Ma, X. (2010). A meta-analysis of effects of computer technology on school students’ mathematics learning. Educational Psychology Review, 22, 215–243. doi: 10.1007/s10648-010-9125-8

  22. 21. Lowrie, T. & Jorgensen, R. (2011). Gender differences in students’ mathematics game playing. Computers and Education, 57, 2244-2248. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.06.010 22. Lynch, J. (2006). Assessing effects of technology usage on mathematics learning. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 18(3), 29–43. Retrieved from http://springer.com/journal/13394 23. National Council of Mathematics Teachers. (2011, April 23). Principles and standards for mathematics education. Retrieved from http://www.nctm.org/standards/content.aspx?id=26792 24. Nejem, K., & Muhanna, W. (2014). The effect of using Smart Board on mathematics achievement and retention of seventh grade students. International Journal of Education, 6 (4), 107–118. Retrieved from http://www.macrothink.org/ije

  23. 25. Mistretta, R. (2005). Integrating technology into the mathematics classroom: The role of teacher preparation programs. The Mathematics Educator, 15(1), 18–24. Retrieved from http://tme.coe.uga.edu 26. Passey, D. (2012). Educational technologies and mathematics: Signature pedagogies and learner impacts. Computer in the Schools, 29, 6–39. doi: 10.1080/07380569.2012.651092 27. Pilli, O., & Aksu, M. (2012). The effects of computer-assisted instruction on the achievement, attitudes and retention of fourth grade mathematics students in North Cyprus. Computers & Education, 62, 62–71. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.010 28. Saha, R., Ayub, A., & Tarmizi, R. (2010). The effects of GeoGebra on mathematics achievement: Enlightening coordinate geometry learning. Social and Behavioral Science, 8, 686–693. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro. 2010.12.095

  24. 29. Seo, Y, & Bryant, D. (2009). Analysis of studies of the effects of computer- assisted instruction on the mathematics performance of students with learning disabilities. Computers & Education, 53, 913–928. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.05.002 30. Sheriff, K., & Boon, R. (2014). Effect of computer-based graphic organizers to solve one-step word problems for middle school students with mild intellectual disability: A preliminary study. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 35, 1828-1837. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2014.03.023 31. Shin, N., Sutherland, L., Norris, C., & Soloway, E. (2012). Effects of game technology on elementary student learning in mathematics. British Journal od Educational Technology, 43(4), 540–560. doi: 10.111/j. 1467-8535.2011.01197.x 32. Sturdivant, R., Dunham, P. & Jardine, R. (2009). Preparing mathematics teachers for technology-rich environments. PRIMUS, 19(2), 161–173. doi:10.1080/10511970802409180

  25. 33. Whetstone, P., Clark, A., Flake, M. (2013). Teachers perceptions of an online tutoring program for elementary mathematics. Educational Media International, 51 (1), 79–90. doi: 10.1080/09523987.2013.863552 34. Zhao, Y., & Lei, J. (2007). Technology uses and student achievement: A longitudinal study. Computers & Education, 49, 284–296. doi: 10.1016/ j.compedu.2005.06.013 35. Zhan, Y., Li, J., Wang, M., Ren, Y., & Chen, H. (2012). Analysis on the applications of information technology in mathematics classroom teaching and its correlation with students’ mathematics achievements in China. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 5(1), 1-12. Retrieved from http://166.111.9.196/evaluate/downloadArticle.do? articleId=2113 36. Zengin, Y., Furkan, H., & Kutluca, T. (2012). The effect of dynamic mathematics software geogebra on student achievement in teaching of trigonometry. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31, 183– 187. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.038

More Related