1 / 27

Medication Reconciliation: whose job is it anyway?

Explore the importance of a multidisciplinary approach to medication reconciliation and the limitations identified in a pharmacist-only approach. Learn about training programs and a survey on clinicians' understanding of medication reconciliation. Discover barriers, improvements, and factors required for future success.

cdonna
Download Presentation

Medication Reconciliation: whose job is it anyway?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Medication Reconciliation:whose job is it anyway?

  2. Why a Multidisciplinary approach? Limitations identified in ‘pharmacists only’ approach • Baseline data from June 2010 showed pharmacists could reconcile medications for 35% of patients within 48 hours (gold standard is within 24 hours) • Insufficient pharmacists to complete and sustain medRec • If pharmacist’s sole focus could compromise other medication safety activities. • Gaps in medRec process would occur after hours and weekends • Address by targeted intervention of complex patients only?

  3. Initial Training: January 2011 • Pharmacy High 5 team developed a presentation • Presented to pharmacists and High 5 core group: • “Train the trainer” • Best Possible Medication history taking • Med Rec process • Compulsory attendance • Resources provided to train/teach ward staff. • Training Road shows – ward based training • Identified unit-specific processes • Grand/ ICU rounds

  4. Ongoing Training • JMO, Registrar and Resident training • Occasional ward based training • Secured additional training slots in orientation program • Medical Intern Pre-registration workshop • Pharmacist orientation • New grad nursing awareness training

  5. Patient Safety Culture in our hospital

  6. 2014 Survey: Objectives: Question Design Primary: Do clinicians understand the importance of Medication Reconciliation: who, how and why? Secondary: • Were there any barriers to implementing this change • Can these barriers be overcome or resolved?

  7. Method • 2 Study sites: POWH, Redlands • Study group: Doctors, pharmacists and nurses • Collected data for 7 days via • Paper forms • Email ‘Survey monkey’ link • Supported by Directors of Clinical Services/Nursing/Pharmacy • Survey respondents remained Anonymous

  8. Results: Demographics

  9. Results: Education/Training • Sample Comments/suggestions: • “I thought this was the role of the pharmacist? Any training would be useful” (Intern) • “Wasn’t able to attend” (Registrar) • “Online training, inservice, verbal discussion?” (RN)

  10. Who is responsible for completing the Medication Management Plan (MMP) form?

  11. What do you understand to be the main reason/s for Medication Reconciliation?

  12. Safety Culture *Medication Management Plan Form = a tool used at POWH to conduct Medication Reconciliation

  13. Overall Comments

  14. Discussion • Identified barriers: • Education reaching all stakeholders (frontline up) • Time • Documentation (electronic vs paper) • Identified improvements: • Patient safety culture awareness • Multidisciplinary approach identified • Limitations

  15. Factors identified required for future success • Dedicated resources • Strong multidisciplinary leadership • Physician champion engagement • Software that supports the High 5 SOP and • Ongoing comprehensive staff education plan • Change readiness of organisation

  16. A Doctor’s perspective

  17. Doctors’ attitudes • ‘We’re very busy’ • ‘Can’t the pharmacists do it?’ • ‘It means writing everything out multiple times’ • ‘What’s the point of it?’ • ‘Why don’t we just wait until electronic prescribing comes in?’

  18. Issues • Capturing the correct audience to educate them that its everyones responsibility • We are missing the middle level (staff specialists, VMOs etc) • IT systems don’t speak to each other (or a mixture of paper and electronic notes) • It requires a change in attitude- but support for change • Senior staff don’t realise the importance of the process

  19. Problem: • Professional boundaries and established hierarchies may result in disagreements about where the responsibility for medicines reconciliation lies Solution: • Focus on reducing the risk for patients and increasing the availability of timely, accurate information • Any potential professional or hierarchical differences should be put aside to enable appropriately trained and competent healthcare professionals to take the lead

  20. Problem: • Competing demands and the common response that ‘the problem is too big — ‘we don’t know where to start’’ can be overwhelming for staff • This can lead to delays in getting medicines reconciliation off the ground Solution: • People need to be supported by managers to enable them to prioritise their workload • simple structures should be put in place so that medicines reconciliation becomes part of the organisation’’s everyday work

  21. There are no quick fixes, but this is a far from insurmountable problem A possible five-level hierarchy approach:

  22. There are no shortcuts to breaking down silos. • You can’t fix the environment if the organization doesn’t understand the problem. • You can’t improve the development process if the right environment doesn’t exist to enable healthy guidelines. • Climb the pyramid brick by brick to the ultimate goal: better clinical outcomes through true collaboration.

  23. Practicalities • How do we ensure senior physicians care? • IIMS categorised into ‘med rec’ errors? • Statistics on IIMS, Med rec compliance to individual departments/teams? League tables?? • Grand rounds? • Presentations of RCAs concerning medication errors? • Using Accreditation- Standard 4 as a bargaining chip?

  24. Involving Patients • The value of involving patients and/or their carers in the medicines reconciliation process should not be underestimated • Patients are a valuable source of information about the medicines they take and, with support, they can be encouraged and enabled to take a fuller and more active part in the process

  25. Organisational approach • The profile of medicines reconciliation needs to be raised in all healthcare organisations • The Chief Executive, senior management lead and board members of an organisation can help by promoting the uptake of medicines reconciliation • Collaborative approach with other Australian hospitals involved • Get process right before instituting eMM- detrimental to put bad stuff into a good system

  26. Guess what?Its YOUR job!

  27. Acknowledgements • Survey question design & data collection: Ketty Rivas (Safety and Health Outcomes Officer) , Selina Boughton (Pharmacist) • Survey promotion: POWH Pharmacists

More Related