1 / 16

SFO APPROACH FOG STUDY 07-09

SFO APPROACH FOG STUDY 07-09. Noel Keene ZOA CWSU Fremont, CA. SFO APPROACH FOG STUDY 07-09. Reason for study: Fog causes significant air traffic impacts at San Francisco International Airport(SFO) Fog is difficult to forecast Overforecast by models

ceana
Download Presentation

SFO APPROACH FOG STUDY 07-09

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. SFO APPROACH FOG STUDY07-09 Noel Keene ZOA CWSU Fremont, CA

  2. SFO APPROACH FOG STUDY07-09 • Reason for study: • Fog causes significant air traffic impacts at San Francisco International Airport(SFO) • Fog is difficult to forecast • Overforecast by models • CWSU often forecasts earlier clearing than actual • Scenario for fog likely follows a pattern • Increased lead-time for fog events and better accuracy for total clearing will benefit air traffic operations

  3. Data • Analyzed fall/winter data for 2007/2008 and 2008/2009 • Parsed out days where 12Z 500mb height was greater than 5690DM and 12Z SFO-SAC pressure gradient > -1mb and < +1mb • All non-frontal fog events occurred in these conditions • Wanted to evaluate conditions affecting fog other than the typical light winds and high pressure

  4. Data • 67 days met initial criteria • 11 fog events • 56 mornings with no fog • Fog event considered to occur when visibility <1SM affected SFO approach zone • Did not use 5/8SM because archived SMB observations do not indicate visibilities <1SM

  5. Data • Evaluated several elements • 12Z OAK 500mb height • Onshore pressure gradient (SFO-SAC) • Offshore gradients (SFO-ACV and SFO-TVL) • 10Z dewpoint at SFO approach zone (SMB) • 12Z OAK 925mb wind direction and speed • Time that visual approaches occurred at SFO • Typically SCT or less coverage of clds of below 3500ft • Typically visibility > 3sm • Forecaster notes taken day of event

  6. Findings • Clearing time later than expected • Some correlation between fog occurrence and: • 10Z SMB Dewpoint • 12Z OAK 925mb wind direction • Weaker correlation between fog occurrence and: • 12Z SFO-ACV gradient • 12Z SFO-TVL gradient

  7. Findings • Many variables contribute to fog formation over Bay Area • Therefore…correlations for single variables are low • Multiple Linear Regression using both 10Z dewpoint and H9 Wind Direction from 180 yielded higher R values • Graphical representation yields some insight into important parameters that contribute to fog formation

  8. Clearing Time • When fog occurred…airport arrival rate never reached optimum(45/60) before 18Z • Average clearing time 21:31 • Two all-day events where fog transitioned to low ceilings

  9. Clearing Time Avg

  10. 10Z SMB Dewpoint Correlation • Correlation between 10Z SMB Dewpoint and Fog Occurrence at SMB • 0.26 • Dewpoint values for fog occurrence • Average…………………..46.8 • Standard Deviation….2.1 • Dewpoint values for mornings with no fog • Average…………………..43.4 • Standard Deviation….5.0

  11. 10Z SMB Dewpoint Correlation Avg

  12. Subtracted 180 from H9 winds and took absolute value Larger numbers represent more northerly winds Correlation between H9 wind direction and fog occurrence at SMB 0.20 H9 wind (FM 180) direction values for fog occurrence Average…………………..147 Standard Deviation….35 H9 wind (FM 180) direction values for mornings with no fog Average…………………..124 Standard Deviation….45 12Z OAK 925mb Wind Direction

  13. 12Z OAK 925mb Wind Direction Avg

  14. Multiple Linear Regression • Low P-Value and Significance F • Indicates both variables (dwpt and wind dir) have some effect on outcome (if fog occurs or not) • Still fairly low correlation (multiple R) • Indicates that using only dewpoint and wind dir to forecast fog would likely yield poor results…this is fairly obvious

  15. Northerly Flow • Northerly flow is only direction where no nearby downsloping will occur • Source region of northerly flow is North Bay Valleys • Average lower minimum temperatures • SF Bay can achieve saturation more readily SFO APPROACH

  16. Preconditions for fog during recent fall/winter seasons at SFO approach have been: H5 Hgt > 5690DM SFO-SAC pressure gradient < 1mb and > -1mb Northerly flow enhances fog formation Negative SFO-ACV pressure gradient Significant northerly component to wind at 925mb High dewpoint temp increases chance for fog formation Fog did not form when 10Z dewpoint temp < 45F SF Bay does not cool as readily as inland valleys so higher dewpoint is needed Keying in on secondary elements that aid in fog formation should provide better lead-time for fog events On fog event days…clearing at SFO approach not likely before 20Z Conclusions

More Related