1 / 7

Fe Cayao-Lasam , petitioner vs Claro and Editha Ramolete , respondents

Petition for review on certiorari under rule 45 of the rules of court filed by Dr.fe cayao-lasam ( petitioner ) seeking to annul the decision of the court of appeals. Fe Cayao-Lasam , petitioner vs Claro and Editha Ramolete , respondents. Complaint.

cecile
Download Presentation

Fe Cayao-Lasam , petitioner vs Claro and Editha Ramolete , respondents

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Petition for review on certiorari under rule 45 of the rules of court filed by Dr.fecayao-lasam(petitioner) seeking to annul the decision of the court of appeals

  2. Fe Cayao-Lasam, petitioner vs Claro and EdithaRamolete, respondents

  3. Complaint • Gross Negligence and Malpractice against Dr. Fe Cayao-Lasam before the PRC • Respondent’s hysterectomy caused by doctor’s untimitigated negligence and professional incompetence in conductiong D&C procedure • Doctor’s failure to remove the fetus inside the womb

  4. Petitioner’s statement • Needed medications were ordered for the patient • Internal examination was done • Open cervix • D&C procedure if (+) profuse bleeding • D&C procedure was done with patient’s consent • Passage of some meaty mass and clotted blood • Patient insisted to be discharged and was advised to return for check-up • Hysterectomy was brought about by the patient’s abnormal pregnancy (placenta increta) • Perfomance of D&C procedure immediately or at a later date would have no difference at all • Uterus would still rupture at any stage of gestation before term

  5. PRC’s Decision • The petitioner was exonerated from the charges filed against her • D&C was necessary • Cervix was open • Stop the profuse bleeding • Simple curettage can’t remove a fetus • More extensive operation needed in order to remove the fetus

More Related