1 / 26

Scholarship of teaching and learning

Scholarship of teaching and learning. Dr Margaret Lloyd Faculty of Education mm.lloyd@qut.edu.au. Wiki. http://csc-2011.wikispaces.com/. the scholarship of discovery the scholarship of integration the scholarship of application the scholarship of teaching. (Boyer, 1990).

cecile
Download Presentation

Scholarship of teaching and learning

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Scholarship of teaching and learning Dr Margaret Lloyd Faculty of Education mm.lloyd@qut.edu.au

  2. Wiki http://csc-2011.wikispaces.com/

  3. the scholarship of discovery • the scholarship of integration • the scholarship of application • the scholarship of teaching. (Boyer, 1990)

  4. For an activity to be designated as scholarship, it should manifest three key characteristics: • public • open to critical review and evaluation • accessible for exchange and use by other members of the scholarly community. (Shulman, 1998)

  5. (Shulman, 1987)

  6. EDAGOGY ONTENT NOWLEDGE PEDAGOGICAL CONTENT KNOWLEDGE

  7. (Koehler & Mishra, 2008; Mishra & Koehler, 2006)

  8. Teaching experience, highlighting successful approaches and strategies • Innovations developed by yourself and/or colleagues • Exploration of disciplinary and cross-disciplinary issues of concern • Reviews of research and literature • Undertaking structured educational research projects • Use of new products and practices, spaces and technologies • Reflection on educational theories, disciplinary assumptions, educational goals • Student learning outcomes • Areas of concern to your students

  9. Higher Education Research and Development HERDSA Journal Publisher website

  10. Critical thinking example… • As a poster (HERDSA Conference, 2010) • As an article • Lloyd, M., &. Bahr, N. (2010). Thinking critically about critical thinking in higher education.International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 4(2). Retrieved from: http://academics.georgiasouthern.edu/ijsotl/v4n2/articles/PDFs/_LloydBahr.pdf

  11. Field, R. & Kift, S. (2010). Addressing the high levels of psychological distress in law student through intentional assessment and feedback design in the first year law curriculum. The International Journal of the First Year in Higher Education, 1(1), 65-76. https://www.fyhe.com.au/journal/index.php/intjfyhe/article/view/20/49

  12. Urbanic, R. J. (2011). Developing design and management skills for senior industrial engineering students. Journal of Learning Design, 4(3), 35-49. http://www.jld.qut.edu.au/publications/vol4no3/UrbanicJLDvol4no3.pdf

  13. Selby, S. (2007). A pilot study investigating the use of action planning statements in tutoring clinical skills to second year medical students. Ergo, 1(1), 7-14. http://www.adelaide.edu.au/erga/ergo/0101/ergo_v1n1_p7-14.pdf

  14. (Booth et al., 2008) CLAIM What reasons support the claim? REASON What evidence support the reasons? EVIDENCE Have alternatives, complications or objections been acknowledged? Has a response been given? ACKNOWLEDGE & RESPOND GENERAL PRINCIPLE (WARRANT)

  15. What is the research setting - course, participants, place or country? • What problem is the article investigating? or What claims have the author(s) made? • Have the author(s) positioned the problem in the literature? • What methodology did the author(s) select? • How was the study conducted? • What were the findings from the study? • Did the author provide a recommendation for teaching practice?

  16. Scholarship properly communicated and critiqued serves as the building blocks for knowledge growth (Shulman, 1998, p. 5)

  17. Booth, W. C., Colomb, G., & Williams, J. M. (2006). The Craft of Research (3rd. ed.). Chicago, ILL: University of Chicago. • Boyer, E. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. • Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1-22. • Shulman, L. (1998). Teacher portfolios: A theoretical activity. In N. Lyons (Ed.),With portfolio in hand: Validating the new teacher professionalism (pp. 23-37). New York: Teachers College Press. • Koehler, M., & Mishra, P. (2008). Introducing TPCK. In AACTE Committee on Innovation and Technology, Handbook of Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPCK) for Educators (pp. 3-29). New York: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group. • Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A new framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.

  18. '

  19. Wiki http://csc-2011.wikispaces.com/

More Related