520 likes | 701 Views
An Overview of Virginia 4-H Camping Program Evaluation: Process and Outcomes. 2002 National 4-H Camping Institute, Ashley, OH February 13-17, 2002 Barry A. Garst, Extension Specialist 4-H Staff Development and Camping Becky Gilles, Program Director Smith Mountain Lake 4-H Educational Center
E N D
An Overview of Virginia 4-H Camping Program Evaluation: Process and Outcomes 2002 National 4-H Camping Institute, Ashley, OH February 13-17, 2002 Barry A. Garst, Extension Specialist 4-H Staff Development and Camping Becky Gilles, Program Director Smith Mountain Lake 4-H Educational Center Bryan Branch, Program Director Holiday Lake 4-H Educational Center Ruben Brown, Urban 4-H Program Assistant Chesapeake Cooperative Extension
Why this session? • Increasing importance of demonstrating the value and benefits of youth programs • Increasing emphasis on the development of rigorous, systematic evaluation procedures and “good” instruments • Importance of sharing information and approaches to evaluating the impacts/outcomes of youth camping
What are your expectations? • What information are you hoping to gain through this session? • Why is this session important to you?
Overview • Overview of Virginia 4-H Camping • 4-H camp evaluation prior to 2001 • 2001 data sources • Results and analysis • Limitations • What did we learn? • Where do we go from here? ASK QUESTIONS AT ANY TIME!
Virginia 4-H Camping • Involved in 4-H camping since 1917 • Recognized as one of Virginia’s primary delivery modes for 4-H educational programs • Conducted at the unit-level (107) and 4-H Center (6) level • Approximately 30,000 served annually • From 1995-2001, approximately 4,000 more youth served
4-H Educational CentersOperation and Management • Virginia’s six 4-H Educational Centers are owned and operated by their respective Boards of Directors • Each 4-H Center has a Memorandum of Understanding with Virginia Tech • Virginia Cooperative Extension provides funding for (1.5 FTE) positions and operations • Virginia Tech provides insurance for facilities • Each 4-H Center is accredited through the American Camping Association
4-H Camp Evaluation Prior to 2001 • Parent/guardian study (1995 and 1998) • Some 4-H Centers were evaluating post-camp satisfaction (ratings, etc.), • Some 4-H Centers were not conducting regular evaluation • No state-wide standardized instruments • No state-wide standardized questions
Evaluation Needs Leading into Summer 2001 • Needed to be able to collect similar data across 4-H Centers • Assess overall program quality • Data to assist resource development • Baseline data for future comparison • Comparing 4-H Centers was not a goal
Data Collection in Summer 2001
Data Sources • Virginia 4-H Camping Participation Form • Standardized 4-H Center Survey • Parent/Guardian Survey
Virginia 4-H Camping Participation Form • Distributed to 113 units in Virginia 4-H • 107 counties/cities • Six (6) 4-H Centers • Questions • WHO is participating? • WHAT programs are being offered? • WHEN are programs taking place? • WHERE are programs being conducted?
Standardized 4-H Center Survey • Population sample • Every Junior 4-H Camp participant • Post-camp survey (last day of camp) • 11,254 surveys collected (82% response) • Questions • Are youth, teen/adult volunteers, and Agents receiving a positive experience during Junior 4-H Camp? • Are youth campers (ages 9-13) receiving life skill benefits as a result of participation in Junior 4-H Camp?
Parent/Guardian Survey • Random sample of youth selected • Survey mailed to parents/guardians • Post camp survey (2 weeks after camp) • Survey/Reminder/2nd Survey • 363 surveys returned (46%) • Questions • What are parents’ perceptions of Junior 4-H Camp? • Are youth campers (ages 9-13) receiving (short-term) life skill benefits as a result of participation in Junior 4-H Camp?
Virginia 4-H Participation Form
4-H Camping ParticipationYouth, Teen Counselors, Adult Volunteers* * Based on a total of 22,816 participants
Percentage of 4-H CampingUnit-based vs. 4-H Center based 150 programs* 148 programs* * Based on a total of 298 camping programs conducted
4-H Camp Participation By 4-H Center* * Based on a total of 22,816 participants
4-H Camp Participation By Month* * Based on a total of 298 camping programs conducted
Types of 4-H Camps Offered • Cloverbud (ages 5-8) • Junior 4-H Camp (ages 9-13) • Teen Camps (ages 14-18) • Day Camps (ages 9-18) • Special Interest Camps (ages 9-18) • Forestry Camp, Shooting Education, Outdoor Adventure, Science and Technology, Family Camp, Creative Arts, Nutrition Education
4-H Camping ProgramsPercentage of 4-H Camping Programs Conducted * Based on a total of 298 camping programs conducted
4-H Camp ParticipationGender * Total of 22,816 participants NOTE: This is a logarithmic scale.
4-H Camp ParticipationEthnic Groups Represented * Total of 22,816 participants NOTE: This is a logarithmic scale.
Previous 4-H Camping Experience * Total of 22,816 participants NOTE: This is a logarithmic scale.
Standardized 4-H Camp Survey Results
2001 Junior 4-H Camp Ratings By Youth Campers Ages 9-13* * Scale of 1-5, where 1=poor and 5= excellent. (n=9,296)
2001 Junior 4-H Camp Ratings By CITs, Teen Counselors, Adult Volunteers, and Extension Agents* * Scale of 1-5, where 1=poor and 5= excellent. (n=1,958)
2001 Junior 4-H Camp Interest in Future 4-H Camp Participation*
4-H Camp Standardized Survey Life Skill Items and Related Domains
2001 Junior 4-H Camp Life Skill Rankings by Youth Campers Ages 9-13* * Youth campers ages 9-13 were asked to identify whether or not attending camp helped them on a scale of 1-4, where 1= helped me very little and 4=helped me very much.
Additional Analysis of Life Skill Items • Significant difference between the life skill mean response of campers ages ages 8-11 and campers ages 12-14 • “helped me to learn more about different subjects” • “helped me to develop new skills in an area that I enjoy” • Suggests that younger campers perceive more educational benefits from 4-H camp than older campers. • This trend is noticeable across most life skill areas (except life skills related to friendship development) suggesting that the Virginia 4-H camping program may be geared towards younger campers.
Parent/Guardian Survey Results
Other Camps in Which 4-H Youth Campers ParticipatedSummer 2001 * This figure (43%) represents 89 other camps in which 4-H youth participated.
2001 Junior 4-H Camp Ratings By Parents/Guardians of 4-H Youth Campers* * Scale of 1-4, where 1=much worse and 4= much better. (n=363)
4-H Camp Parent/Guardian Survey Life Skill Items and Related Domains
Data Analysis of Life Skill Items • Conducted paired t-test comparison of “before-camp” and “after-camp” life skill averages (means)
2001 Junior 4-H Camp Life Skill Rankings by Youth Campers Ages 9-13 Before and After Attending Junior 4-H Camp* 1 Parents were asked to rate their child’s life skill behavior before and after the Junior 4-H Camp experience on a scale of 1-4, where 1= almost never and 5= almost always. 2 Paired t-test analysis found significant differences (p<.05) between all of the before and after camp mean comparisons.
Additional Analysisof Life Skill Items • Additional t-test analysis of life skill rankings among male and female campers indicated individual benefits (rather than gender-related benefits) as perceived by campers’ parents/guardians • “Gender” differences do not explain significant results • Suggests that Junior 4-H camp programs/activities are appropriate for both genders.
Summary of Outcomes • Youth (ages 9-13) perceived that Junior 4-H Camp participation increased their own skills (immediate outcomes) • Developing social relationships with new friends • Developing new skills • Parents/guardians perceived that Junior 4-H Camp participation increased their child’s life skill behaviors(short-term outcomes) • “takes care of his/her own things” • “shares work responsibilities” • “takes initiative and is a self-starter”
Limitations • Standardized survey • Response bias (tendency to respond favorably) • Lack of pre-test (How did campers’ perceive their life skills before camp?) • Lack of analysis of open-ended responses • Parent/guardian survey • Response bias (Who returned the survey? / What about non-respondents?) • Can outcomes be attributed to something else? • Others (What do you think??)
Value of Systematic Evaluation • 1st step has been taken!! • Standardized evaluation allowed for state-wide reporting of 4-H camp outputs and outcomes • Standardized evaluation can provide data for meaningful comparisons • Staff/volunteers learned the importance of evaluation in the programming process • Evaluation results are assisting resource development • 4-H Centers • Virginia 4-H Foundation
Where do we go from here?Impact on Virginia 4-H Camping- Programs • Examine 4-H camp components that received lower ratings • Explore the 12-14 year old camp experience
Where do we go from here?Impact on Virginia 4-H Camping- Program Evaluation • Utilize methods that are less labor-intensive • Review life-skills that were assessed in 2001 • Qualitative study to explore results • CIT and teen leadership • 12-14 year old experience • Long-term outcomes of 4-H camp involvement
Where do we go from here?Impact on National 4-H Camping • As a 4-H camping community, we should explore 4-H camping outcomes together • COMMUNICATE- Increase communication about our instruments, methods, and results • COLLABORATE- Work together to develop a multi-state approach to evaluating 4-H camp program outcomes
Where do we go from here?Impact on National 4-H Camping • Virginia invites other states to work with us to develop a National 4-H Camp Research Consortium by 2005.
Summary • Overview of Virginia 4-H Camping • 4-H camp evaluation prior to 2001 • 2001 data sources • Results and Analysis • Limitations • What did we learn? • Future evaluation • State and national levels
What do you still need? • Were any of your questions unanswered? If so, what are they? • What would help you to better understand or apply the information learned in this session?