250 likes | 430 Views
Teaching Multiplication Facts to Students with Learning Difficulties. A Graduate Research Project. By Theresa L. Lemus Santos. The Problem. The overarching problem is that students with disabilities have difficulty learning multiplication facts. Why??. Existing Research….
E N D
Teaching Multiplication Facts to Students with Learning Difficulties
A Graduate Research Project By Theresa L. Lemus Santos
The overarching problem is that students with disabilities have difficulty learning multiplication facts. Why??
Existing Research… • Smith and Smith, 2006 - retention and comprehension • Masoura, 2006 - working memory • Burns, 2005 - Processing • Stading and Williams, 1996 - use counting
How do students with disabilities learn best? Williams and Collins, 1994 • 3 modalities • 3 stages
Using the Research of… • Williams and Collins, 1994 • Brookhart, Andolina, Zuza, and Furman, 2004 - Self assessment To design a program to teach multiplication facts…
The Concrete Stage In this stage, multiplication facts revolve around a physical model of a key. FOR EXAMPLE: 3 x 6 would be…
The Semi-Concrete Stage Varies from the concrete stage
Symbolic Stage Presents the facts in their traditional form. 3 x 6 = 18
The Groups • Students with Disabilities Experimental and Control Group Consist of 7 students each • General Education Students Experimental and Control Group Consist of 20 and 21 students respectively
The Instruction • Two 30-minute sessions per week • Experimental Group: The program • Control Group: Traditional flash cards • The Hypothesis • Pre-test/Post-test • Fact quizzes and student self-assessment
Table 1. Results of t-Test for Independent Means: Students with Disabilities
Table 1. Results of t-Test for Independent Means: General Education Students
The Results • Pre-test scores low • Means of the Posttests • T-test results
Implications For Education
Use of multi-sensory approach • Concrete to Symbolic • Student Self-assessment
Brookhart, S. M., Andolina, M., Zuza, M., & Furman, R. (2004). Minute math: An action research study of student self-assessment. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 57, 213-227. • Burns, M. (2005). Using incremental rehearsal to increase fluency of single-digit multiplication facts with children identified as learning disabled in mathematics computation. Education and Treatment of Children, 28, 237-249. • Campbell, J. I. D. (1997). On the relation between skilled performance of simple division and multiplication. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 1140-1159. • Gelzheiser, L. M., Solar, R. A., Shepherd, M. J., & Wozniak, R. H. (1983). Teaching learning disabled children to memorize: A rationale for plans and practice. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 16 421-425. • Greene, G. (1999). Mnemonic multiplication fact instruction for students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 14(3), 141-148. • Kaufmann, L., Lochy, A., Drexler, A., & Semenza, C. (2004). Deficient arithmetic fact retrieval-storage or access problem? A case study. Neuropsychologia, 42, 482-496. • Kroesbergen, E. H., & Van Luit, J. E. H. (2002). Teaching multiplication to low math performers: Guided versus structured instruction. Instructional Science, 30, 361-378. • Lee, D. L., Stansbery, S., Kubina, R., Jr., & Wannarka, R. (2005). Explicit instruction with or without high-p sequences: Which is more effective to teach multiplication facts? Journal of Behavioral Education, 14(4), 267-281. • Masoura, E. V. (2006). Establishing the link between working memory function and learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 4(2), 29-42. • Mauro, D. G., LeFevre, J., & Morris, J. (2003). Effects of problem format on division and multiplication performance: Division facts are mediated via multiplication-based representations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 163-170.
Robinson, K. M., Arbuthnott, K. D., & Gibbons, K. A. (2002). Adults’ representation of division facts: A consequence of learning history? Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56, 302-309. • Smith, S. Z., & Smith M. E. (2006). Assessing elementary understanding of multiplication concepts. School Science & Mathematics, 106(3), 140-149. • Stading, M., & Williams, R. L. (1996). Effects of a copy, cover, and compare procedure on multiplication facts mastery with a third grade girl with learning disabilities in a home setting. Education and Treatment of Children, 19(4), 425-434. • Steel, S., & Funnell, E. (2001). Learning multiplication facts: A study of children taught by discovery methods in England. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 79(1),37-55. • Williams, D. M., & Collins, B.C. (1994). Teaching multiplication facts to students with learning disabilities: Teacher-selected versus student-selected material prompts within the delay procedure. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27, 589-597. • Wood, D. K., & Frank, A. R. (2000). Using memory-enhancing strategies to learn multiplication facts. Teaching Exceptional Children, 32(5), 78-82. • Wood, D. K., Frank, A. R., & Wacker D. P. (1998). Teaching multiplication facts to students with learning disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 31, 323-338.