160 likes | 342 Views
StiVmc. V. Perevoztchikov Brookhaven National Laboratory,USA. Compare. Compare.2. Compare.3. All Tracks(Stv & Sti ). :. Good Tracks (Stv & Sti). :. Hits per track(Stv & Sti). :. Hits per track : Pt (Stv & Sti). :. Hits/Track : tan( λ ) (Stv & Sti). :. dP/P :P (Stv & Sti). :.
E N D
StiVmc V. Perevoztchikov Brookhaven National Laboratory,USA
Compare StarSoft local
Compare.2 StarSoft local
Compare.3 StarSoft local
All Tracks(Stv & Sti ) : StarSoft local
Good Tracks (Stv & Sti) : StarSoft local
Hits per track(Stv & Sti) : StarSoft local
Hits per track : Pt (Stv & Sti) : StarSoft local
Hits/Track : tan(λ) (Stv & Sti) • . : StarSoft local
dP/P :P (Stv & Sti) : StarSoft local
dVtx (Stv & Sti) : StarSoft local
Dca00 (Stv & Sti) • . : StarSoft local
DcaXY & DcaZ to McVtx(Stv & Sti) StarSoft local
Global Pt,tan(λ),ψ (Stv & Sti) StarSoft local
Primary Pt,tan(λ),ψ (Stv & Sti) StarSoft local
Summary • Sti has more globals & primaries in total. But Stv has more good globals & primaries. (nHits>15). What does it mean?; • Stv has better or equal accuracy almost everywhere ; • Stv has more hits on tracks, especially with big λ or small Pt, which was expected; • Sti has slightly better accuracy improvement when primary vertex included. Probably it is related to refitting with primary vertex which is not used in Stv yet. • Sti & Stv have the same accuracy in energy loss. That means, in spite of very poor Sti geometry description, Yuri succeeded to define it very well. • Stv is not yet tested for Svt, Ssd, Ftpc etc… But Stv must work for Ftpc and other non TPC like detectors. • In both cases (Stv & Sti) hit errors are not good. In result pulls are big (Stv around 5 and for Sti around 3). Fit of errors is needed for both. StarSoft local