90 likes | 98 Views
Explore Nokia's approach to IPR litigation for computer programmes, covering patentability, validity, infringement, prior art, and (F)RAND commitments. Get insights from Nokia’s director of European litigation.
E N D
Nokia’s IPR Litigation Strategy as Regards Computer Programmes 15 October 2011 Presentation to AIPPI, Hyderabad Richard Vary, Director of European Litigation Personal observations and experiences only: not necessarily the views of Nokia
Examples of Computer Programme cases • Air Interface • User interface • Voice encoding • Data compression • “applications” 2 Personal observations and experiences only: not necessarily the views of Nokia
Issues that arise 1. Patentability 3 Personal observations and experiences only: not necessarily the views of Nokia
Issues that arise 2. Validity 4 Personal observations and experiences only: not necessarily the views of Nokia
Issues that arise 3. Infringement 5 Personal observations and experiences only: not necessarily the views of Nokia
Issues that arise4: Cats Prior art Infringement Infringement 6 Personal observations and experiences only: not necessarily the views of Nokia
Issues that arise5. Hares and Tortoises German infringement court German Federal Patent Court UK court Italian Civil Court Dutch court French court Italian Prosecutors 7 Personal observations and experiences only: not necessarily the views of Nokia
Issues that arise 6. (F)RAND 8 Personal observations and experiences only: not necessarily the views of Nokia
Nokia’s *new* IPR Litigation Strategy as regards Computer Programmes • Prior art searches • Will you need discovery? • How “fluffy” is the patent? Split or squeeze? • Are you in a race? If so, win • (F)RAND commitments: have you made an offer? • Don’t entirely forget about exclusions from patentability… 9 Personal observations and experiences only: not necessarily the views of Nokia