270 likes | 282 Views
This study examines equal double junctions in 24 GeV proton-irradiated MCZ n- and p-type Si detectors, exploring potential new effects in this unique scenario. The research involves systematic TCT studies comparing electron and hole current shapes in different detector types. Experimental conditions and results are discussed to reveal insights into the peculiar phenomena observed. The control case of FZ detectors is also analyzed for comparison. This study contributes to advancing the understanding of radiation hard silicon detectors.
E N D
Systematic TCT Investigation of Equal-Double-Junctions in 24 GeV Proton Irradiated MCZ n and p-type Si Detectors Z. Li1, G. Carini1, W. Chen1, V. Eremin2, J. Harkonen3, P. Luukka3, E. Tuominen3,E.Tuovinen3, E. Verbitskaya2 1Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY 11973, USA 2Ioffe Physico-Technical Institute, St. Petersburg, Russia 2Helsinki Institute of Physics, Helsinki, Finland 12th RD50 - Workshop on Radiation hard semiconductor devices for very high luminosity colliders Ljubljana, Slovenia, 2-4 June 2008 *This research was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy: Contract No. DE-AC02 -98CH10886
Outline 1. Introduction 2. Experimental conditions 3. Results and discussions 4. Summary
Introduction • Up to now, no standard SCSI has been observed in 24 GeV p-irradiated MCZ n-type Si detectors • Double junction/peak was seen with TCT, only in electron current pulse shapes though [1,2]. • Unlike any other cases, the second peak/junction was not the dominate one • Is there a SCSI in 24 GeV p-irradiated MCZ n-type Si detectors • Whatever it is, it is not in the conventional term • Any new effect in this special case (MCZ, 24 GeV proton)? • Systematic TCT studies needed to have the complete picture: • Both electron and hole current shapes should be looked (with and without trapping corrections) • Both n and p type MCZ Si detectors should be investigated • Need to compare with the control case (FZ, 24 GeV proton) • E. Verbitskaya, V. Eremin, Z. Li, J. Harkonen, M. Bruzzi. Concept of Double Peak electric field distribution in the development of radiation hard silicon detectors // Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 583 (2007) 77-86. • 2. Donato Creanza, 3rd Workshop on Advanced Silicon Radiation Detectors (3D and P-type Technologies) • 14-16 April 2008, Barcelona, Spain
Current [A] Time [s] Electron injection – front side illumination p+/n-/n+ Trapping
Current [A] Time [s] Hole injection – back side illumination p+/n-/n+ Trapping
Experimental Conditions • Samples: • 3 sets of samples studied MCZ n-type (p+/n/n+), MCZ p-type (n+/p/p+), and FZ n-type (p+/n/n+ ) control samples • MCZ samples were made by HIP, FZ samples were made by CNM • Radiations: • 24 GeV Proton from CERN, fluence 1.6x1014p/cm2 to 2.4x1015 p/cm2 • 22-23 day RT anneal • Experimental technique: IV, CV, and TCT [3] with red (635 nm) laser (all measured at BNL at RT) on both p+ and n+ contacts • 3. V. Eremin, N. Strokan, E. Verbitskaya and Z. Li, NIM A 372 (1996) 388-298
FZ-n, #F-82, 1.6x1014 p/cm2 Double junction/peak clearly seen 1st peak changes little with bias (e’s) 2nd peak takes over at higher biases than the full depletion voltage (e’s) -SC dominates at high biases (SCSI) Experimental Results and DiscussionsFZ n-type Si (control samples) h’s p+ n+ e’s p+ n+ Double peaks clearly seen SCSI at high V 212V 242V 193V 212V 173V 173V 153V 94V (Vfd(CV)=145V) 133V 45V b) Hole transient For h’s, the 2nd peak (minor, near p+) can hardly be seen It is consistent with a minor 1st peak (also near p+) for e’s p+ n+ 123V 114V 104V 94V 45V a) Electron transient
FZ-n, #F-84, 3.2x1014 p/cm2 Double junction/peak clearly seen 1st peak changes little with bias (e’s) 2nd peak takes over at higher biases than the full depletion voltage (e’s) -SC dominates at high biases (SCSI) Experimental Results and DiscussionsFZ n-type Si (control samples) p+ n+ Double peaks clearly seen SCSI at high V n+ p+ 381V 362V 478V 342V 381V 322V 282V 185V 303V (Vfd~303V) 90V b) Hole transient p+ n+ 283V 254V 234V 185V 90V a) Electron transient
FZ-n, #F-87, 9.7x1014 p/cm2 Double junction/peak clearly seen 1st peak changes little with bias (e’s) 2nd peak takes over at higher biases than the full depletion voltage (e’s) -SC dominates at high biases (SCSI) Experimental Results and DiscussionsFZ n-type Si (control samples) Double peaks clearly seen SCSI at high V n+ p+ p+ n+ 738V 649V 647V 460V 598V (Vfd~550V) 548V 270V 502V 86V n+ p+ b) Hole transient 457V 363V 270V 177V 85V a) Electron transient
FZ-n, #F-88, 1.3x1015 p/cm2 Double junction/peak clearly seen 1st peak changes little with bias (e’s) 2nd peak takes over at higher biases than the full depletion voltage (e’s) -SC dominates at high biases (SCSI) Experimental Results and DiscussionsFZ n-type Si (control samples) Double peaks clearly seen SCSI at high V n+ p+ p+ n+ 876V 797V 892V 724V 714V 541V 671V (Vfd~671V) 356V 83V p+ n+ b) Hole transient 624V 577V 541V 356V 85V a) Electron transient
FZ-n, #F-89, 2.4x1015 p/cm2 Double junction/peak clearly seen Nearly identical (symmetrical) TCT curves for both e and h Not fully depleted +SC dominates near p+ contact, -SC dominates near n+ contact Experimental Results and DiscussionsFZ n-type Si (control samples) p+ n+ p+ n+ (Vfd>1000V) 400V 326V 250V 168V 86V a) Electron transient b) Hole transient Identical/symmetrical Not fully depleted
Experimental Results and DiscussionsMCZ n-type Si MCZ-n, #01-N-32, 1.6x1014 p/cm2 NO SCSI, slightly double junction/peak seen p+ n+ p+ n+ 492V 443V 393V 343V 294V 394V 294V 194V (Vfd(CV)=132V) n+ p+ 96V 274V a) Electron transient 254V 234V Double peaks just start 214V 194V b) Hole transient
Experimental Results and DiscussionsMCZ n-type Si MCZ-n, #01-N-31, 3.2x1014 p/cm2 double junction/peak clearly seen Similar TCT curves for both e and h +SC dominates at high biases p+ n+ p+ n+ Nearly identical 380V 485V 387V 435V 386V 337V p+ n+ 337V 288V 287V 238V 189V p+ n+ 86V 267V 170V 248V 254V 228V 298V 208V 342V p+ n+ 189V (Vfd(CV)=170V) p+ n+ 170V p+ n+ 150V 170V 130V c) Hole transient Measured with sample upside-down (to get more laser illumination) 150V 111V 130V 91V 111V 91V a) Electron transient b) Hole transient
Experimental Results and DiscussionsMCZ n-type Si MCZ-n, #01-N-62, 9.7x1014 p/cm2 double junction/peak clearly seen Nearly identical TCT curves for both e and h Equal-Double-Junction +SC dominates near p+ contact, -SC dominates near n+ contact p+ n+ 745V p+ n+ 650V 553V (Vfd(CV)=380V) Identical 455V 365V 408V 318V 271V 178V 87V a) Electron transient 363V 316V 269V 176V 85V b) Hole transient
Experimental Results and DiscussionsMCZ n-type Si MCZ-n, #01-N-62, 9.7x1014 p/cm2 double junction/peak clearly seen Nearly identical TCT curves for both e and h Equal-Double-Junction +SC dominates near p+ contact, -SC dominates near n+ contact Hole transient Measured with sample upside-down (use the Laser-front fiber in the system to get more laser illumination, maybe some blockage in the Laser-back fiber, and the Al mesh on the back still blocks some laser light, also more leakage current) VB VLaser Effect of bias Effect of laser power 74V 156V -6V 241V -7V 329V 412V -8V -9V -10V Identical to the e’s VLaser = -10V VB = 329V p+ p+ n+ n+ a) Hole transient, various biases b) Hole transient, various laser biases
MCZ-n, #01-N-20, 1.3x1015 p/cm2 double junction/peak clearly seen Nearly identical TCT curves for both e and h Equal-Double-Junction +SC dominates near p+ contact, -SC dominates near n+ contact Experimental Results and DiscussionsMCZ n-type Si identical p+ n+ p+ n+ 900V 993V 908V 720V 725V 629V 629V 532V 532V (Vfd~530V) 74V 152V 231V p+ n+ 305V p+ n+ 380V 440V 442V 353V 352V p+ n+ 263V 263V 173V 172V 84V 83V c) Hole transient Upside-down b) Hole transient a) Electron transient
MCZ-n, #01-N-27, 2.4x1015 p/cm2 double junction clearly seen Nearly identical (symmetrical) TCT curves for both e and h (this is similar to the conventional cases: FZ with any particle irradiation (p, n pion), MCZ with low energy p, and n) Equal-Double-Junction Not fully depleted +SC dominates near p+ contact, -SC dominates near n+ contact Experimental Results and DiscussionsMCZ n-type Si Identical/symmetrical Not fully depleted p+ n+ p+ n+ (Vfd>1000V) 660V 650V 632V 635V 500V 500V 334V 335V 79V 77V b) Hole transient a) Electron transient
Experimental Results and DiscussionsMCZ p-type Si MCZ-p, #p-069-62, 1.6x1014 p/cm2 Double junction/peak clearly seen -SC dominates at high biases 165V 165V 195V 195V 245V 245V 292V 340V 293V 340V p+ n+ p+ n+ Double peaks 46V (Vfd(CV)=45V) 62V 46V n+ 86V 86V 105V 106V 125V 125V 145V p+ p+ n+ b) Hole transient a) Electron transient
Experimental Results and DiscussionsMCZ p-type Si MCZ-p, #p-069-64, 3.2x1014 p/cm2 Double junction/peak clearly seen Nearly identical TCT curves for both e and h Equal-Double-Junction -SC slightly dominates at high biases 282V 376V 472V 565V 44V 660V 91V (Vfd(CV)=115V) n+ p+ 140V Nearly identical 188V 236V 44V p+ n+ 91V 140V 188V a) Electron transient 236V n+ p+ b) Hole transient
MCZ-p, #p-069-72, 9.7x1014 p/cm2 Double junction/peak clearly seen Nearly identical TCT curves for both e and h Equal-Double-Junction +SC dominates near p+ contact, -SC dominates near n+ contact Experimental Results and DiscussionsMCZ p-type Si 86V 85V 178V 178V 273V 196V (Vfd~273V) 320V 215V 345V 234V p+ n+ n+ p+ Identical 254V 273V (Vfd~273V) 292V 361V 321V 363V 401V p+ n+ n+ p+ a) Electron transient b) Hole transient
MCZ-p, #p-069-74, 1.3x1015 p/cm2 Double junction/peak clearly seen Nearly identical TCT curves for both e and h Equal-Double-Junction +SC dominates near p+ contact, -SC dominates near n+ contact Experimental Results and DiscussionsMCZ p-type Si 81V 172V 263V 355V 393V (Vfd~393V) p+ n+ n+ p+ Identical a) Electron transient b) Hole transient
MCZ-p, #p-069-75, 2.4x1015 p/cm2 double junction clearly seen Nearly identical (symmetrical) TCT curves for both e and h (this is similar to the conventional cases: FZ with any particle irradiation (p, n pion), MCZ with low energy p, and n) Equal-Double-Junction Not fully depleted +SC dominates near p+ contact, -SC dominates near n+ contact Experimental Results and DiscussionsMCZ p-type Si 76V 163V 251V 337V 413V (Vfd>800V) p+ n+ Identical/symmetrical Not fully depleted n+ p+ b) Hole transient a) Electron transient
Experimental Results and DiscussionsAfter trapping corrections FZ-n, DP/DJ dominated by the one near the n+ MCZ-p, equal-double-peak /DJ near p+ and n+ MCZ-n, equal-double-peak /DJ near p+ and n+ (Laser front) (Laser front) p+ n+ e’s p+ p+ n+ n+ -SC +SC -SC +SC -SC +SC (Laser back) (Laser back) p+ h’s n+ -SC p+ n+ p+ n+ +SC -SC +SC -SC +SC
Experimental Results and Discussions SCSI Summary
Summary • Standard SCSI has not been observed in the 24 GeV proton-irradiated MCZ n-type Si detectors in the fluence range studied here --- it seems that it skips the standard SCSI and goes directly into the double peak/double junction stage • This double peak/double junction effect is observed in both MCZ n-type and p-type Si detectorsirradiated by 24 GeV protons • However, this double peak/double junction effect is not the same as in the case for the control sample set (FZ n-type Si, 24 GeV proton-irradiated): the two peaks/junction are almost the same (after trapping corrections), indicating half +SC and half –SC in the detector, especially at higher fluences than 3x1014 p/cm2, regardless of bias voltages • In fact this effect is unique only for this special combination (24 GeV proton-irradiated MCZ n-type and p-type Si detectors) • Equal-double-junction helps to low the Vfd significantly • Physical models are needed to explain this: maybe combined effect of clusters, point-defects, and high oxygen concentration (not related to initial doping)? And about equal trapping probabilities for e’s near the n+ contact and h’s near the p+ contact? • Fitting of the data for double junction profiles will be done soon
Backup slides Full-Depletion Voltage (Vfd) Summary The Equal-double-junction helps to low the Vfd!
Summary on full-depletion voltage (Vfd), normalized to d=300 µm The Equal-double-junction helps to low the Vfd!