270 likes | 423 Views
More General IBA Calculations Spanning the triangle How to use the IBA in real life. Sph. Deformed. Classifying Structure -- The Symmetry Triangle. Most nuclei do not exhibit the idealized symmetries but rather lie in transitional regions. Mapping the triangle.
E N D
More General IBA Calculations Spanning the triangleHow to use the IBA in real life
Sph. Deformed Classifying Structure -- The Symmetry Triangle Most nuclei do not exhibit the idealized symmetries but rather lie in transitional regions. Mapping the triangle.
Mapping the Triangle with a minimum of data -- exploiting an Ising-type Model –The IBA Competition betweenspherical-driving (pairing – like nucleon)anddeformation-driving(esp. p-n)interactions H =aHsph +bHdef Structure ~a/b Def. Sph.
Relation of IBA Hamiltonian to Group Structure We will now see that this same Hamiltonian allows us to calculate the properties of a nucleus ANYWHERE in the triangle simply by choosing appropriate values of the parameters
O(6) U(5) SU(3) V (γ) vs. χ H = -κ Q • Q What is the physical meaning of c If you think about zero point motion in a potential like this, it is clear that <γ> depends on c. For a flat potential the nucleus oscillates back and forth from 0 to 60 degrees so <γ> = 30 deg. For SU(3), <γ> will be small – nucleus is axially symmetric. Only minimum is at γ = 0o All γ excursions due to dynamical fluctuations in γ (γ-softness), not to rigid asymmetric shapes. This is confirmed experimentally !!!
O(6) U(5) SU(3)
c Mapping the Entire Triangle with a minimum of data H =ε nd - Q Q Parameters: , c (within Q) /ε 2 parameters 2-D surface /ε Use of this form of the Hamiltonian, with T(E2) = aQ, is called the Consistent Q Formalism (or CQF). Roughly 94.68572382% of IBA calculations are done this way. Awkward, though that varies from 0 to infinity /ε
0+ 4+ 2+ 2.5 1 2+ 0 0+ ζ H = c [ ( 1 – ζ ) nd - O(6) Qχ ·Qχ ] ζ = 1, χ = 0 4NB 0+ 2γ+ χ 3.33 4+ 2+ 0+ 2.0 4+ 1 2+ 2+ 1 ζ 0 0+ 0+ 0 U(5) SU(3) ζ = 0 ζ = 1, χ = -1.32 Spanning the Triangle
CQF along the O(6) – SU(3) leg H = -κ Q • Q Only a single parameter, H =ε nd - Q Q Two parameters ε / and
Os isotopes from A = 186 to 192: Structure varies from a moderately gamma soft rotor to close to the O(6) gamma-independent limit. Describe simply with: H = -κ Q • Q : 0 small as Adecreases
O(6) U(5) SU(3) Universal O(6) – SU(3) Contour Plots in the CQF H = -κ Q • Q χ = 0 O(6) χ = = - 1.32 SU(3) SU(3) O(6) ( χ = - 2.958 )
Now, what about more general calculations throughout the triangle • Spanning the triangle • How do we fix the IBA parameters for any given collective nucleus?
H has two parameters. A given observable can only specify one of them. What does this imply? An observable gives a contour of constant values within the triangle = 2.9 R4/2
At the basic level : 2 observables (to map any point in the symmetry triangle) Preferably with perpendicular trajectories in the triangle 2.7 2.9 2.5 3.1 3.3 2.2 A simple way to pinpoint structure. What do we need? Simplest Observable: R4/2 Only provides a locus of structure
Contour Plots in the Triangle 2.7 2.9 10 13 7 2.5 3.1 4 2.2 3.3 2.2 17 0.05 7 10 13 4 0.1 0.4 2.2 0.01 17 R4/2
We have a problem What we have: What we need: Lots of Just one +2.0 +2.9 +1.4 +0.4 +0.1 -1 -0.1 -0.4 -2.0 -3.0 Fortunately:
Mapping Structure with Simple Observables – Technique of Orthogonal Crossing Contours γ - soft Vibrator Rotor Burcu Cakirli et al. Beta decay exp. + IBA calcs.
156Er R4/2 = 0.0 = 2.3
Evolution of Structure Complementarity of macroscopic and microscopic approaches. Why do certain nuclei exhibit specific symmetries? Why these evolutionary trajectories? What will happen far from stability in regions of proton-neutron asymmetry and/or weak binding?