170 likes | 458 Views
Rights-Based Approaches and Human Rights Impact Assessment. Mainstreaming and Indicators, HOM 23-24 November 2006. Three Problems to be Analysed. Does RBA enhance the chances of better HRIA?
E N D
Rights-Based Approaches and Human Rights Impact Assessment Mainstreaming and Indicators, HOM 23-24 November 2006
Three Problems to be Analysed • Does RBA enhance the chances of better HRIA? • What are the methodologies of human rights mainstreaming in country analysis and in programming? Will RBA lead to mainstreaming? • What promises does the progress in HR indicator formulation entail?
Overview: Main Headings • Defining RBA • What is the main problem with respect to HR Integration of donors (and foreign policy agencies)? • Distinguishing RBA from HRIA • Donor considerations: mainstreaming HR/developing HR Indicators • REflections about HRIA • HR Indicators • Where are we landing?
Main problems of Donor and (Foreign Policy) HR Integration • Uncertainty of HR mainstreaming prevails in dev assistance • A potentially competing agenda: aid effectiveness more interest in good governance than in HR • HRBA may provide new inspiration, but does it deliver? A re-politization of aid maybe.. But for whom? The UN, INGOs or LONGOs. Main test: the actual benefits for poor or marginalized people
What is a Rights-Based Approach? OHCHR: • Normative basis in HR • Operational: directed towards promotion and protection • Inequalities lie at the heart of developmental problems • Redress discriminatory practices • Transform unjust distributions of power that impede development
Distinguishing RBA and HRIA • RBA represents an approach to programming and to strategies of development • HRIA is an approach to ex ante assessment and evaluation intending to assess implications of interventions HRIA can be informed by RBA thinking inasmuch as RBA will define particular components of intervention (e.g., duty-bearer accountability, rights-holder claims etc.). The OHCHR emphasis on inequality and non-discrimination may also inspire development of indicators in these fields
Three General Problems of RBA • Do donors endorse RBA? • What are the alternatives to RBA? • What is the value added?
Five Options of Human Rights Integration(Following L-H Piron)
Reflections about HRIA • One caveat of complexity: The levels of Analysis: • Country analysis • Programme and project analysis • At the country level, impact analysis is complex unless impact is reduced to a measurable target • At the programme, project level, impact analysis is more easy
The Value Added of HRIA 1. A focus on risks: • Complicity in HR Violations, • Risks of Partners: Compromising their safety 2. A focus on context vs operational goals 3. A focus on indicators 4. A focus on Monitoring Results
Indicators – What are the problems? Major advance: OHCHR Report on Compliance: • Structure, Process and Outcome Indicators Major trend: Indicators transformed into targets • A question lurking: Are HR Indicators distinct?
How are Indicators formulated? Theories Concepts/Goals/Rights Specification/ Attribute Indicators Targets Data
Implications of Targeting • Whatever the indicator – the quantified measures count • Who defines the target? • Benchmarking becomes vital • Causes less so • Institutional and organization dimensions might become underplayed
Final Observations • The impact of RBA thinking is as yet uncertain • The donor emphasis on effectiveness of aid may imply less attention to HR mainstreaming • HR indicators: Progress in terms of determining indicators of compliance • Measuring duty-bearer efforts (measuring conduct) still warranted • Existing trend of quantified targets may ensure more systematic use of indicators, but less clarification of substance